Johan Paulander, Rebecca Ahlstrand, Erzsébet Bartha, Lena Nilsson, Klara Rakosi, Gabriel Sandblom, Egidijus Semenas, Sigridur Kalman
{"title":"通过全球触发工具和反思主题方法分析高风险手术后死亡前的事件。","authors":"Johan Paulander, Rebecca Ahlstrand, Erzsébet Bartha, Lena Nilsson, Klara Rakosi, Gabriel Sandblom, Egidijus Semenas, Sigridur Kalman","doi":"10.1111/aas.14528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative mortality might be influenced by postoperative care, vigilance, and competence to rescue. This study aims to describe the course of events preceding death in a high-risk surgical cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed hospital records of patients who died within 30 days after surgery in 4 high volume hospitals using (1) reflective narrative thematic approach to identify recurring themes reflecting issues with conduct of care and (2) Global Trigger Tool to describe incidence, timing, and types of adverse events (AEs) leading to harm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative predicted median risk of death in the studied group was 9%/13% according to SORT/P-POSSUM, respectively. Nine recurring themes were identified. Prominent themes were \"consensus concerning aim and/or risk with planned surgery,\" \"level of (intraoperative) competence and monitoring,\" and in the postoperative period \"level of care and vigilance\" on signs of deterioration. We found a total of 303 AEs, with only three patients (5%) having no adverse events. Most common severity category was \"I,\" that is \"contributed to patient's death\" (n = 110, 36% of all AEs). Of these, 60% were classified as preventable or probably preventable. The peak incidence of AEs was seen on the day of index surgery. Most common types of AEs were \"failure of vital functions\" (n = 79, 26%), followed by infections (n = 45, 15%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A high predicted risk of death and a peak of adverse events on the day of index surgery were detected. Identified themes reflect lack of documented multi-professional consensus on how to handle prevalent perioperative risk, vigilance, and postoperative level of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"1481-1486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Events preceding death after high-risk surgery analyzed by Global Trigger Tool and reflective-thematic approach.\",\"authors\":\"Johan Paulander, Rebecca Ahlstrand, Erzsébet Bartha, Lena Nilsson, Klara Rakosi, Gabriel Sandblom, Egidijus Semenas, Sigridur Kalman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aas.14528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative mortality might be influenced by postoperative care, vigilance, and competence to rescue. This study aims to describe the course of events preceding death in a high-risk surgical cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed hospital records of patients who died within 30 days after surgery in 4 high volume hospitals using (1) reflective narrative thematic approach to identify recurring themes reflecting issues with conduct of care and (2) Global Trigger Tool to describe incidence, timing, and types of adverse events (AEs) leading to harm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative predicted median risk of death in the studied group was 9%/13% according to SORT/P-POSSUM, respectively. Nine recurring themes were identified. Prominent themes were \\\"consensus concerning aim and/or risk with planned surgery,\\\" \\\"level of (intraoperative) competence and monitoring,\\\" and in the postoperative period \\\"level of care and vigilance\\\" on signs of deterioration. We found a total of 303 AEs, with only three patients (5%) having no adverse events. Most common severity category was \\\"I,\\\" that is \\\"contributed to patient's death\\\" (n = 110, 36% of all AEs). Of these, 60% were classified as preventable or probably preventable. The peak incidence of AEs was seen on the day of index surgery. Most common types of AEs were \\\"failure of vital functions\\\" (n = 79, 26%), followed by infections (n = 45, 15%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A high predicted risk of death and a peak of adverse events on the day of index surgery were detected. Identified themes reflect lack of documented multi-professional consensus on how to handle prevalent perioperative risk, vigilance, and postoperative level of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1481-1486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14528\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Events preceding death after high-risk surgery analyzed by Global Trigger Tool and reflective-thematic approach.
Background: Postoperative mortality might be influenced by postoperative care, vigilance, and competence to rescue. This study aims to describe the course of events preceding death in a high-risk surgical cohort.
Methods: We analyzed hospital records of patients who died within 30 days after surgery in 4 high volume hospitals using (1) reflective narrative thematic approach to identify recurring themes reflecting issues with conduct of care and (2) Global Trigger Tool to describe incidence, timing, and types of adverse events (AEs) leading to harm.
Results: Preoperative predicted median risk of death in the studied group was 9%/13% according to SORT/P-POSSUM, respectively. Nine recurring themes were identified. Prominent themes were "consensus concerning aim and/or risk with planned surgery," "level of (intraoperative) competence and monitoring," and in the postoperative period "level of care and vigilance" on signs of deterioration. We found a total of 303 AEs, with only three patients (5%) having no adverse events. Most common severity category was "I," that is "contributed to patient's death" (n = 110, 36% of all AEs). Of these, 60% were classified as preventable or probably preventable. The peak incidence of AEs was seen on the day of index surgery. Most common types of AEs were "failure of vital functions" (n = 79, 26%), followed by infections (n = 45, 15%).
Conclusions: A high predicted risk of death and a peak of adverse events on the day of index surgery were detected. Identified themes reflect lack of documented multi-professional consensus on how to handle prevalent perioperative risk, vigilance, and postoperative level of care.
期刊介绍:
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.