对南非 Tshwane 地区卫生服务机构为第二受害者提供的支持进行评估。

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Doudou K Nzaumvila, Tombo Bongongo, Indiran Govender, Sunday O Okeke
{"title":"对南非 Tshwane 地区卫生服务机构为第二受害者提供的支持进行评估。","authors":"Doudou K Nzaumvila, Tombo Bongongo, Indiran Govender, Sunday O Okeke","doi":"10.4102/safp.v66i1.5980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Initiatives to reduce patient safety incidents (PSI) and support healthcare professionals who may experience psychological trauma as a result are becoming increasingly common. However, little is known about the quality of the support provided by Tshwane District Health Services. Therefore, it is necessary to assess their assistance for the second victims in order to evaluate their effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted, and 319 healthcare professionals from six primary health care institutions were invited to participate in the study. The sociodemographic information, work experience, emotional support, familiarity with the concept of the 'second victim' and involvement with PSIs were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 39.8 years, ranging from 22 years to 66 years. The majority of participants were females (n = 249; 78.1%), nurses (n = 153; 49.2%), and those with 5-9 years of experience (n = 82; 25.8%). Most participants (n = 168; 52.7%) were aware of the possibilities of emotional support, while less than half (n = 142; 44.5%) were familiar with the term 'second victim'. The cumulative incidence of adverse events in the institutions was 19.4%, and the majority of second victims (n = 39; 62.9%) emotionally felt the need to speak with someone about it, preferably outside of the workplace. Less than 5% of individuals received support that was initiated by existing structures at their workplace.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frameworks exist to assist second victims, although they are only known to some healthcare professionals. However, their current use in Tshwane health facilities is ineffective. After experiencing PSIs, second victims often rely on psychological assistance outside of the workplace.Contribution: Authorities need to determine the causes behind some healthcare professionals' lack of awareness regarding the support framework for second victims, as well as their growing tendency to rely on psychologists outside of the workplace, and corrective measures should be implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":22040,"journal":{"name":"South African Family Practice","volume":"66 1","pages":"e1-e6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of support to the second victims in Tshwane District Health Services, South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Doudou K Nzaumvila, Tombo Bongongo, Indiran Govender, Sunday O Okeke\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/safp.v66i1.5980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Initiatives to reduce patient safety incidents (PSI) and support healthcare professionals who may experience psychological trauma as a result are becoming increasingly common. However, little is known about the quality of the support provided by Tshwane District Health Services. Therefore, it is necessary to assess their assistance for the second victims in order to evaluate their effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted, and 319 healthcare professionals from six primary health care institutions were invited to participate in the study. The sociodemographic information, work experience, emotional support, familiarity with the concept of the 'second victim' and involvement with PSIs were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 39.8 years, ranging from 22 years to 66 years. The majority of participants were females (n = 249; 78.1%), nurses (n = 153; 49.2%), and those with 5-9 years of experience (n = 82; 25.8%). Most participants (n = 168; 52.7%) were aware of the possibilities of emotional support, while less than half (n = 142; 44.5%) were familiar with the term 'second victim'. The cumulative incidence of adverse events in the institutions was 19.4%, and the majority of second victims (n = 39; 62.9%) emotionally felt the need to speak with someone about it, preferably outside of the workplace. Less than 5% of individuals received support that was initiated by existing structures at their workplace.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frameworks exist to assist second victims, although they are only known to some healthcare professionals. However, their current use in Tshwane health facilities is ineffective. After experiencing PSIs, second victims often rely on psychological assistance outside of the workplace.Contribution: Authorities need to determine the causes behind some healthcare professionals' lack of awareness regarding the support framework for second victims, as well as their growing tendency to rely on psychologists outside of the workplace, and corrective measures should be implemented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Family Practice\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447557/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Family Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v66i1.5980\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Family Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v66i1.5980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景: 为减少患者安全事故(PSI)并为可能因此遭受心理创伤的医护人员提供支持的举措越来越普遍。然而,人们对茨瓦内区卫生服务机构所提供支持的质量知之甚少。因此,有必要对他们为第二受害者提供的援助进行评估,以评价其有效性: 我们进行了一项横断面研究,邀请了来自 6 家初级卫生保健机构的 319 名专业医护人员参与研究。研究收集了医护人员的社会人口学信息、工作经验、情感支持、对 "第二受害者 "概念的熟悉程度以及是否参与过 PSI: 平均年龄为 39.8 岁,从 22 岁到 66 岁不等。大多数参与者为女性(n = 249;78.1%)、护士(n = 153;49.2%)和拥有 5-9 年工作经验者(n = 82;25.8%)。大多数参与者(n = 168;52.7%)了解情感支持的可能性,而只有不到一半的参与者(n = 142;44.5%)熟悉 "第二受害者 "这一术语。机构中不良事件的累计发生率为 19.4%,大多数第二受害者(n = 39;62.9%)在情感上认为有必要与人倾诉,最好是在工作场所之外。只有不到 5%的人得到了工作场所现有机构提供的支持: 结论:尽管只有部分医疗保健专业人员了解帮助第二受害者的框架,但这些框架是存在的。然而,目前在茨瓦内的医疗机构中使用这些框架的效果并不理想。在经历了 PSI 之后,第二受害者往往依赖于工作场所以外的心理援助:当局需要确定一些医疗保健专业人员对第二受害者支持框架缺乏认识,以及他们越来越倾向于在工作场 所外依赖心理学家的原因,并应采取纠正措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of support to the second victims in Tshwane District Health Services, South Africa.

Background: Initiatives to reduce patient safety incidents (PSI) and support healthcare professionals who may experience psychological trauma as a result are becoming increasingly common. However, little is known about the quality of the support provided by Tshwane District Health Services. Therefore, it is necessary to assess their assistance for the second victims in order to evaluate their effectiveness.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted, and 319 healthcare professionals from six primary health care institutions were invited to participate in the study. The sociodemographic information, work experience, emotional support, familiarity with the concept of the 'second victim' and involvement with PSIs were collected.

Results: The mean age was 39.8 years, ranging from 22 years to 66 years. The majority of participants were females (n = 249; 78.1%), nurses (n = 153; 49.2%), and those with 5-9 years of experience (n = 82; 25.8%). Most participants (n = 168; 52.7%) were aware of the possibilities of emotional support, while less than half (n = 142; 44.5%) were familiar with the term 'second victim'. The cumulative incidence of adverse events in the institutions was 19.4%, and the majority of second victims (n = 39; 62.9%) emotionally felt the need to speak with someone about it, preferably outside of the workplace. Less than 5% of individuals received support that was initiated by existing structures at their workplace.

Conclusion: Frameworks exist to assist second victims, although they are only known to some healthcare professionals. However, their current use in Tshwane health facilities is ineffective. After experiencing PSIs, second victims often rely on psychological assistance outside of the workplace.Contribution: Authorities need to determine the causes behind some healthcare professionals' lack of awareness regarding the support framework for second victims, as well as their growing tendency to rely on psychologists outside of the workplace, and corrective measures should be implemented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Family Practice
South African Family Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: South African Family Practice (SAFP) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which strives to provide primary care physicians and researchers with a broad range of scholarly work in the disciplines of Family Medicine, Primary Health Care, Rural Medicine, District Health and other related fields. SAFP publishes original research, clinical reviews, and pertinent commentary that advance the knowledge base of these disciplines. The content of SAFP is designed to reflect and support further development of the broad basis of these disciplines through original research and critical review of evidence in important clinical areas; as well as to provide practitioners with continuing professional development material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信