淋巴细胞亚群与冠状动脉疾病风险之间的因果关系:双样本孟德尔随机化研究》。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-11 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2509326
Zhao Ma, Libo Liu, Jinfan Tian, Chenchen Tu, Dongfeng Zhang, Mingduo Zhang, Huan Zhang, Ziyu An, Meichen Sun, Hongjia Zhang, Xiantao Song
{"title":"淋巴细胞亚群与冠状动脉疾病风险之间的因果关系:双样本孟德尔随机化研究》。","authors":"Zhao Ma, Libo Liu, Jinfan Tian, Chenchen Tu, Dongfeng Zhang, Mingduo Zhang, Huan Zhang, Ziyu An, Meichen Sun, Hongjia Zhang, Xiantao Song","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2509326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, the causal relationship between lymphocyte subsets and coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear. Therefore, we utilized Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess the association between lymphocyte subsets and CAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a two-sample MR analysis using publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) datasets. The primary method of analysis to comprehensively evaluate causal effects was the inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method. The four additional MR approaches were MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode. Sensitivity analysis incorporated Cochran's Q and MR-Egger intercept tests to identify residual heterogeneity and potential horizontal pleiotropy, respectively. The MR-PRESSO distortion test was applied to identify potential pleiotropic outliers. Leave-one-out analysis confirmed that no single single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) significantly affected the MR estimate. We conducted reverse MR analysis to investigate the impact of variables correlated with outcomes in forward MR analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IVW method revealed a significant positive association between B cell count and CAD (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.11), <i>p</i> = 2.67 × 10<sup>-5</sup>). A similar association was observed between B cell count and myocardial infarction (MI) (OR = 1.07 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.11), <i>p</i> = 5.69 × 10<sup>-4</sup>). Sensitivity analyses detected no outliers, heterogeneity, or pleiotropy. The reverse MR analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of CAD and MI on B cell count, and the IVW results showed no statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that a higher absolute B cell count is linked to an increased risk of CAD and MI.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"25 9","pages":"326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal Relationships between Lymphocyte Subsets and Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhao Ma, Libo Liu, Jinfan Tian, Chenchen Tu, Dongfeng Zhang, Mingduo Zhang, Huan Zhang, Ziyu An, Meichen Sun, Hongjia Zhang, Xiantao Song\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.rcm2509326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, the causal relationship between lymphocyte subsets and coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear. Therefore, we utilized Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess the association between lymphocyte subsets and CAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a two-sample MR analysis using publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) datasets. The primary method of analysis to comprehensively evaluate causal effects was the inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method. The four additional MR approaches were MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode. Sensitivity analysis incorporated Cochran's Q and MR-Egger intercept tests to identify residual heterogeneity and potential horizontal pleiotropy, respectively. The MR-PRESSO distortion test was applied to identify potential pleiotropic outliers. Leave-one-out analysis confirmed that no single single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) significantly affected the MR estimate. We conducted reverse MR analysis to investigate the impact of variables correlated with outcomes in forward MR analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IVW method revealed a significant positive association between B cell count and CAD (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.11), <i>p</i> = 2.67 × 10<sup>-5</sup>). A similar association was observed between B cell count and myocardial infarction (MI) (OR = 1.07 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.11), <i>p</i> = 5.69 × 10<sup>-4</sup>). Sensitivity analyses detected no outliers, heterogeneity, or pleiotropy. The reverse MR analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of CAD and MI on B cell count, and the IVW results showed no statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that a higher absolute B cell count is linked to an increased risk of CAD and MI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 9\",\"pages\":\"326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440411/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2509326\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2509326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,淋巴细胞亚群与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)之间的因果关系仍不清楚。因此,我们利用孟德尔随机化(MR)来评估淋巴细胞亚群与冠状动脉疾病之间的关系:我们利用公开的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据集进行了双样本 MR 分析。全面评估因果效应的主要分析方法是反方差加权法(IVW)。另外四种 MR 方法是 MR-Egger、加权中位数、简单模式和加权模式。敏感性分析采用了 Cochran's Q 和 MR-Egger 截距检验,分别用于识别残余异质性和潜在的水平多向性。MR-PRESSO 扭曲检验用于识别潜在的多向异性异常值。剔除分析证实,没有一个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)会对MR估计值产生显著影响。我们进行了反向 MR 分析,以研究与正向 MR 分析结果相关的变量的影响:IVW方法显示,B细胞计数与CAD之间存在明显的正相关(几率比(OR)= 1.08(95% CI:1.04,1.11),P = 2.67 × 10-5)。B 细胞计数与心肌梗死(MI)之间也存在类似的关联(OR = 1.07 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.11),p = 5.69 × 10-4)。敏感性分析未发现异常值、异质性或多重效应。为了研究CAD和MI对B细胞数量的影响,进行了反向MR分析,IVW结果显示无统计学意义:我们的研究表明,B细胞绝对计数越高,患CAD和MI的风险越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal Relationships between Lymphocyte Subsets and Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

Background: Currently, the causal relationship between lymphocyte subsets and coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear. Therefore, we utilized Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess the association between lymphocyte subsets and CAD.

Methods: We performed a two-sample MR analysis using publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) datasets. The primary method of analysis to comprehensively evaluate causal effects was the inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method. The four additional MR approaches were MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode. Sensitivity analysis incorporated Cochran's Q and MR-Egger intercept tests to identify residual heterogeneity and potential horizontal pleiotropy, respectively. The MR-PRESSO distortion test was applied to identify potential pleiotropic outliers. Leave-one-out analysis confirmed that no single single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) significantly affected the MR estimate. We conducted reverse MR analysis to investigate the impact of variables correlated with outcomes in forward MR analysis.

Results: The IVW method revealed a significant positive association between B cell count and CAD (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.11), p = 2.67 × 10-5). A similar association was observed between B cell count and myocardial infarction (MI) (OR = 1.07 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.11), p = 5.69 × 10-4). Sensitivity analyses detected no outliers, heterogeneity, or pleiotropy. The reverse MR analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of CAD and MI on B cell count, and the IVW results showed no statistical significance.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that a higher absolute B cell count is linked to an increased risk of CAD and MI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信