在血糖正常、糖尿病前期和糖尿病的不同阶段用颈动脉股动脉脉搏波速度测量主动脉僵硬度:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2509339
Xiao Liang, Dongdong Li, Zhen Wang, Yuxin Cheng, Ke Mou, Chenyu Ye, Yunyou Duan, Yong Yang
{"title":"在血糖正常、糖尿病前期和糖尿病的不同阶段用颈动脉股动脉脉搏波速度测量主动脉僵硬度:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Xiao Liang, Dongdong Li, Zhen Wang, Yuxin Cheng, Ke Mou, Chenyu Ye, Yunyou Duan, Yong Yang","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2509339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore aortic stiffness measured by carotid femoral-pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) at different stages of normal glucose, prediabetes, and diabetes mellitus (DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature comparing aortic stiffness (AS) with cf-PWV between DM and non-DM samples was systematically retrieved from Pubmed, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CNKI, and Wanfang databases. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the literature. The primary endpoint was the mean difference (MD) of cf-PWV between the normal glucose and DM samples and normal glucose and prediabetes samples. The secondary endpoints were the MD of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (cr-PWV). Aggregated MD and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. When the I<sup>2</sup> value was >50% or <i>p</i> < 0.01, the heterogeneity was considered large, and the random-effect model was used; otherwise, the fixed-effect model was used. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the source of heterogeneity, and a funnel plot and the regression Egger test was utilized to assess the publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 studies were finally enrolled. Samples with DM had a higher cf-PWV value and cIMT value than those without DM, and the differences were statistically significant. The cr-PWV measurements tended to be higher in the DM group than in the non-DM group, but the difference was not significant. Samples with prediabetes also had a significantly higher cf-PWV value than samples with normal glucose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Samples with DM and prediabetes were associated with a higher cf-PWV value, indicating that DM patients had a higher central AS. Central AS progresses at the prediabetes stage. These data provide insight into understanding the mechanism of adverse effects of DM and prediabetes on artery stiffness.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"25 9","pages":"339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aortic Stiffness Measured by Carotid Femoral-Pulse Wave Velocity at Different Stages of Normal Glucose, Prediabetes, and Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Liang, Dongdong Li, Zhen Wang, Yuxin Cheng, Ke Mou, Chenyu Ye, Yunyou Duan, Yong Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.rcm2509339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore aortic stiffness measured by carotid femoral-pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) at different stages of normal glucose, prediabetes, and diabetes mellitus (DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature comparing aortic stiffness (AS) with cf-PWV between DM and non-DM samples was systematically retrieved from Pubmed, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CNKI, and Wanfang databases. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the literature. The primary endpoint was the mean difference (MD) of cf-PWV between the normal glucose and DM samples and normal glucose and prediabetes samples. The secondary endpoints were the MD of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (cr-PWV). Aggregated MD and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. When the I<sup>2</sup> value was >50% or <i>p</i> < 0.01, the heterogeneity was considered large, and the random-effect model was used; otherwise, the fixed-effect model was used. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the source of heterogeneity, and a funnel plot and the regression Egger test was utilized to assess the publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 studies were finally enrolled. Samples with DM had a higher cf-PWV value and cIMT value than those without DM, and the differences were statistically significant. The cr-PWV measurements tended to be higher in the DM group than in the non-DM group, but the difference was not significant. Samples with prediabetes also had a significantly higher cf-PWV value than samples with normal glucose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Samples with DM and prediabetes were associated with a higher cf-PWV value, indicating that DM patients had a higher central AS. Central AS progresses at the prediabetes stage. These data provide insight into understanding the mechanism of adverse effects of DM and prediabetes on artery stiffness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 9\",\"pages\":\"339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440398/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2509339\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2509339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通过颈动脉股动脉脉搏波速度(cf-PWV)测量正常血糖、糖尿病前期和糖尿病(DM)不同阶段的主动脉僵化:目的:探讨在血糖正常、糖尿病前期和糖尿病(DM)的不同阶段,通过颈动脉股动脉脉搏波速度(cf-PWV)测量主动脉僵硬度的方法:方法:从 Pubmed、Ovid Medline、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus、CNKI 和 Wanfang 数据库中系统检索了用 cf-PWV 比较 DM 和非 DM 样本主动脉僵化(AS)的文献。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估文献质量。主要终点是正常血糖和糖尿病样本与正常血糖和糖尿病前期样本之间 cf-PWV 的平均差(MD)。次要终点是颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT)和颈动脉桡动脉脉搏波速度(cr-PWV)的MD。计算了汇总的MD和95%置信区间。当 I2 值大于 50% 或 p < 0.01 时,异质性被认为较大,采用随机效应模型;否则,采用固定效应模型。为确定异质性的来源,进行了敏感性分析,并利用漏斗图和回归 Egger 检验来评估发表偏倚:结果:最终共有 37 项研究入选。有 DM 的样本的 cf-PWV 值和 cIMT 值均高于无 DM 的样本,且差异具有统计学意义。糖尿病组的cr-PWV测量值往往高于非糖尿病组,但差异不显著。糖尿病前期样本的cf-PWV值也明显高于血糖正常的样本:结论:糖尿病和糖尿病前期样本的cf-PWV值较高,表明糖尿病患者的中心性强直性脊柱炎程度较高。中心强直性脊柱炎会在糖尿病前期阶段发展。这些数据有助于了解糖尿病和糖尿病前期对动脉僵化产生不利影响的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aortic Stiffness Measured by Carotid Femoral-Pulse Wave Velocity at Different Stages of Normal Glucose, Prediabetes, and Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: To explore aortic stiffness measured by carotid femoral-pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) at different stages of normal glucose, prediabetes, and diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods: The literature comparing aortic stiffness (AS) with cf-PWV between DM and non-DM samples was systematically retrieved from Pubmed, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CNKI, and Wanfang databases. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the literature. The primary endpoint was the mean difference (MD) of cf-PWV between the normal glucose and DM samples and normal glucose and prediabetes samples. The secondary endpoints were the MD of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (cr-PWV). Aggregated MD and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. When the I2 value was >50% or p < 0.01, the heterogeneity was considered large, and the random-effect model was used; otherwise, the fixed-effect model was used. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the source of heterogeneity, and a funnel plot and the regression Egger test was utilized to assess the publication bias.

Results: A total of 37 studies were finally enrolled. Samples with DM had a higher cf-PWV value and cIMT value than those without DM, and the differences were statistically significant. The cr-PWV measurements tended to be higher in the DM group than in the non-DM group, but the difference was not significant. Samples with prediabetes also had a significantly higher cf-PWV value than samples with normal glucose.

Conclusions: Samples with DM and prediabetes were associated with a higher cf-PWV value, indicating that DM patients had a higher central AS. Central AS progresses at the prediabetes stage. These data provide insight into understanding the mechanism of adverse effects of DM and prediabetes on artery stiffness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信