{"title":"在应对大规模人员伤亡时,比较灾害医疗援助队和多架配备医生的直升机的使用情况。","authors":"Youichi Yanagawa, Akio Kanda, Hiroki Nagasawa, Hiromichi Ohsaka, Kazuhiko Omori","doi":"10.2185/jrm.2024-021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the differences between doctor helicopters (DHs) and disaster medical assistance teams (DMATs), based on past examples and the current situation in Shizuoka Prefecture.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>First, we examined cases in Shizuoka Prefecture from 2014 to 2023, wherein incidents involving five or more injured individuals were managed using multiple DHs simultaneously. Next, we investigated the presence of DMATs in Shizuoka Prefecture and assessed their role in disaster responses within the prefecture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Since 2014, there have been eight incidents in Shizuoka Prefecture wherein multiple DHs were deployed to respond to mass casualties. Shizuoka DMATs were placed on standby thrice during the same period, with one active deployment during a disaster caused by a landslide in Atami. The other two cases were managed solely by DHs and ambulance teams.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Localized disasters in Shizuoka Prefecture have seen the effective use of multiple DHs for timely patient transportation, particularly when weather conditions were suitable. By contrast, DMATs are primarily deployed for extended medical activities lasting more than one day. This differentiation highlights the importance of choosing an appropriate medical response approach based on the nature and scope of a disaster.</p>","PeriodicalId":73939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","volume":"19 4","pages":"300-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the utilization of disaster medical assistance teams and multiple physician-staffed helicopters in mass casualty responses.\",\"authors\":\"Youichi Yanagawa, Akio Kanda, Hiroki Nagasawa, Hiromichi Ohsaka, Kazuhiko Omori\",\"doi\":\"10.2185/jrm.2024-021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the differences between doctor helicopters (DHs) and disaster medical assistance teams (DMATs), based on past examples and the current situation in Shizuoka Prefecture.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>First, we examined cases in Shizuoka Prefecture from 2014 to 2023, wherein incidents involving five or more injured individuals were managed using multiple DHs simultaneously. Next, we investigated the presence of DMATs in Shizuoka Prefecture and assessed their role in disaster responses within the prefecture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Since 2014, there have been eight incidents in Shizuoka Prefecture wherein multiple DHs were deployed to respond to mass casualties. Shizuoka DMATs were placed on standby thrice during the same period, with one active deployment during a disaster caused by a landslide in Atami. The other two cases were managed solely by DHs and ambulance teams.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Localized disasters in Shizuoka Prefecture have seen the effective use of multiple DHs for timely patient transportation, particularly when weather conditions were suitable. By contrast, DMATs are primarily deployed for extended medical activities lasting more than one day. This differentiation highlights the importance of choosing an appropriate medical response approach based on the nature and scope of a disaster.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of rural medicine : JRM\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"300-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442083/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of rural medicine : JRM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2024-021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2024-021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of the utilization of disaster medical assistance teams and multiple physician-staffed helicopters in mass casualty responses.
Objective: To investigate the differences between doctor helicopters (DHs) and disaster medical assistance teams (DMATs), based on past examples and the current situation in Shizuoka Prefecture.
Materials and methods: First, we examined cases in Shizuoka Prefecture from 2014 to 2023, wherein incidents involving five or more injured individuals were managed using multiple DHs simultaneously. Next, we investigated the presence of DMATs in Shizuoka Prefecture and assessed their role in disaster responses within the prefecture.
Results: Since 2014, there have been eight incidents in Shizuoka Prefecture wherein multiple DHs were deployed to respond to mass casualties. Shizuoka DMATs were placed on standby thrice during the same period, with one active deployment during a disaster caused by a landslide in Atami. The other two cases were managed solely by DHs and ambulance teams.
Conclusion: Localized disasters in Shizuoka Prefecture have seen the effective use of multiple DHs for timely patient transportation, particularly when weather conditions were suitable. By contrast, DMATs are primarily deployed for extended medical activities lasting more than one day. This differentiation highlights the importance of choosing an appropriate medical response approach based on the nature and scope of a disaster.