在内侧半月板后根修复术中,前方骨隧道位置会增加半月板移位:缝合长度变化的尸体研究

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Kazuya Nishino, Yusuke Hashimoto, Takuya Kinoshita, Ken Iida, Shuko Tsumoto, Hiroaki Nakamura
{"title":"在内侧半月板后根修复术中,前方骨隧道位置会增加半月板移位:缝合长度变化的尸体研究","authors":"Kazuya Nishino,&nbsp;Yusuke Hashimoto,&nbsp;Takuya Kinoshita,&nbsp;Ken Iida,&nbsp;Shuko Tsumoto,&nbsp;Hiroaki Nakamura","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study investigated differences in the migration of meniscus sutured with pull-out sutures for treating medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) according to the bone tunnel position, using cadaveric knees.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Six knees of three donors fixed using Thiel's method were included in this study. The MMPRTs were created, and a single suture was performed at the torn meniscus using an arthroscopic procedure. The suture was pulled out through the tibial bone tunnel, and the meniscus displacement was measured as the change in length during 0–120° of knee flexion. Three types of bone tunnels (anatomical, anterior and posterior) were created for each knee, and the sutures were pulled out of each tunnel three times. After completing all measurements, the proximal tibia was extracted and micro-computed tomography was performed to evaluate the tunnel position.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A significantly smaller change in suture length was observed in the posterior group compared to the other two groups (anatomical group, 5.17 ± 1.8 mm; anterior group, 7.50 ± 3.2 mm; posterior group, 1.17 ± 1.0 mm; <i>p</i> &gt; 0.01). In addition, a significant correlation between the anteroposterior tunnel position and suture length change was observed (<i>r</i> = −0.720; <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>When pull-out sutures were used to repair MMPRTs, the suture length change was approximately 5 mm during knee flexion and extension when the bone tunnel was located at the anatomical attachment site. This change was larger when the tunnel position was anterior, and smaller when the tunnel position was posterior.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>LEVEL Ⅲ case–control study</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anterior bone tunnel position increases meniscus migration in medial meniscus posterior root repair: A cadaveric study of suture length changes\",\"authors\":\"Kazuya Nishino,&nbsp;Yusuke Hashimoto,&nbsp;Takuya Kinoshita,&nbsp;Ken Iida,&nbsp;Shuko Tsumoto,&nbsp;Hiroaki Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study investigated differences in the migration of meniscus sutured with pull-out sutures for treating medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) according to the bone tunnel position, using cadaveric knees.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Six knees of three donors fixed using Thiel's method were included in this study. The MMPRTs were created, and a single suture was performed at the torn meniscus using an arthroscopic procedure. The suture was pulled out through the tibial bone tunnel, and the meniscus displacement was measured as the change in length during 0–120° of knee flexion. Three types of bone tunnels (anatomical, anterior and posterior) were created for each knee, and the sutures were pulled out of each tunnel three times. After completing all measurements, the proximal tibia was extracted and micro-computed tomography was performed to evaluate the tunnel position.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A significantly smaller change in suture length was observed in the posterior group compared to the other two groups (anatomical group, 5.17 ± 1.8 mm; anterior group, 7.50 ± 3.2 mm; posterior group, 1.17 ± 1.0 mm; <i>p</i> &gt; 0.01). In addition, a significant correlation between the anteroposterior tunnel position and suture length change was observed (<i>r</i> = −0.720; <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>When pull-out sutures were used to repair MMPRTs, the suture length change was approximately 5 mm during knee flexion and extension when the bone tunnel was located at the anatomical attachment site. This change was larger when the tunnel position was anterior, and smaller when the tunnel position was posterior.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>LEVEL Ⅲ case–control study</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70028\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究使用尸体膝关节,调查了在治疗内侧半月板后根撕裂(MMPRTs)时,使用拉出缝合线缝合的半月板在骨隧道位置上的迁移差异。 方法 本研究共纳入三位供体的六个膝关节,采用 Thiel 法进行固定。创建 MMPRT 后,使用关节镜手术对撕裂的半月板进行单次缝合。缝合线通过胫骨骨隧道拉出,半月板移位的测量值为膝关节屈曲 0-120° 时的长度变化。为每个膝关节创建了三种类型的骨隧道(解剖型、前方型和后方型),从每种隧道中拉出缝线三次。完成所有测量后,提取胫骨近端,进行微型计算机断层扫描以评估隧道位置。 结果 后组的缝合长度变化明显小于其他两组(解剖组,5.17 ± 1.8 mm;前组,7.50 ± 3.2 mm;后组,1.17 ± 1.0 mm;p >0.01)。此外,还观察到前后隧道位置与缝合长度变化之间存在明显的相关性(r = -0.720;p = 0.001)。 结论 当使用拉出缝合线修复 MMPRT 时,当骨隧道位于解剖附着部位时,膝关节屈伸过程中缝合长度的变化约为 5 毫米。当骨隧道位置在前方时,缝合长度变化较大,而当骨隧道位置在后方时,缝合长度变化较小。 证据等级 LEVEL Ⅲ 级 病例对照研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Anterior bone tunnel position increases meniscus migration in medial meniscus posterior root repair: A cadaveric study of suture length changes

Anterior bone tunnel position increases meniscus migration in medial meniscus posterior root repair: A cadaveric study of suture length changes

Purpose

This study investigated differences in the migration of meniscus sutured with pull-out sutures for treating medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) according to the bone tunnel position, using cadaveric knees.

Methods

Six knees of three donors fixed using Thiel's method were included in this study. The MMPRTs were created, and a single suture was performed at the torn meniscus using an arthroscopic procedure. The suture was pulled out through the tibial bone tunnel, and the meniscus displacement was measured as the change in length during 0–120° of knee flexion. Three types of bone tunnels (anatomical, anterior and posterior) were created for each knee, and the sutures were pulled out of each tunnel three times. After completing all measurements, the proximal tibia was extracted and micro-computed tomography was performed to evaluate the tunnel position.

Results

A significantly smaller change in suture length was observed in the posterior group compared to the other two groups (anatomical group, 5.17 ± 1.8 mm; anterior group, 7.50 ± 3.2 mm; posterior group, 1.17 ± 1.0 mm; p > 0.01). In addition, a significant correlation between the anteroposterior tunnel position and suture length change was observed (r = −0.720; p = 0.001).

Conclusions

When pull-out sutures were used to repair MMPRTs, the suture length change was approximately 5 mm during knee flexion and extension when the bone tunnel was located at the anatomical attachment site. This change was larger when the tunnel position was anterior, and smaller when the tunnel position was posterior.

Level of Evidence

LEVEL Ⅲ case–control study

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信