{"title":"全球数据治理正处于转折点?反思中美跨境数据流监管模式","authors":"Wanxiu Xu , Shuo Wang , Xiaodong Zuo","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China and the United States have traditionally represented the ‘security paradigm’ and ‘freedom paradigm’ in their regulatory approaches to cross-border data flow. However, with the introduction of new rules governing these flows in both countries, this article challenges that perspective and explores the potential implications of this shift for global data governance. Specifically, it analyzes how the recent regulations in China and the United States serve as critical turning points affecting the transition between these paradigms, focusing on the overall regulatory frameworks and institutional developments in both nations. The article provides legal, institutional, and case-based examples to illustrate these changes. Furthermore, it offers a comparative analysis of the existing models for cross-border data flow regulation between China and the United States. Targeted compliance advice is provided for multinational corporations and other businesses frequently engaging in international operations that may be impacted by these regulatory changes. This research aims to deliver comprehensive insights into the latest regulatory developments in both countries and their existing models for cross-border data governance, thereby assisting enterprises in developing effective compliance strategies in practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 106061"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global data governance at a turning point? Rethinking China-U.S. cross-border data flow regulatory models\",\"authors\":\"Wanxiu Xu , Shuo Wang , Xiaodong Zuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>China and the United States have traditionally represented the ‘security paradigm’ and ‘freedom paradigm’ in their regulatory approaches to cross-border data flow. However, with the introduction of new rules governing these flows in both countries, this article challenges that perspective and explores the potential implications of this shift for global data governance. Specifically, it analyzes how the recent regulations in China and the United States serve as critical turning points affecting the transition between these paradigms, focusing on the overall regulatory frameworks and institutional developments in both nations. The article provides legal, institutional, and case-based examples to illustrate these changes. Furthermore, it offers a comparative analysis of the existing models for cross-border data flow regulation between China and the United States. Targeted compliance advice is provided for multinational corporations and other businesses frequently engaging in international operations that may be impacted by these regulatory changes. This research aims to deliver comprehensive insights into the latest regulatory developments in both countries and their existing models for cross-border data governance, thereby assisting enterprises in developing effective compliance strategies in practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106061\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924001274\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924001274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Global data governance at a turning point? Rethinking China-U.S. cross-border data flow regulatory models
China and the United States have traditionally represented the ‘security paradigm’ and ‘freedom paradigm’ in their regulatory approaches to cross-border data flow. However, with the introduction of new rules governing these flows in both countries, this article challenges that perspective and explores the potential implications of this shift for global data governance. Specifically, it analyzes how the recent regulations in China and the United States serve as critical turning points affecting the transition between these paradigms, focusing on the overall regulatory frameworks and institutional developments in both nations. The article provides legal, institutional, and case-based examples to illustrate these changes. Furthermore, it offers a comparative analysis of the existing models for cross-border data flow regulation between China and the United States. Targeted compliance advice is provided for multinational corporations and other businesses frequently engaging in international operations that may be impacted by these regulatory changes. This research aims to deliver comprehensive insights into the latest regulatory developments in both countries and their existing models for cross-border data governance, thereby assisting enterprises in developing effective compliance strategies in practice.
期刊介绍:
CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.