以缩减为基础的流动性风险分析

Q1 Mathematics
{"title":"以缩减为基础的流动性风险分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jfds.2024.100138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Trading volumes are key variables in determining the degree of an asset's liquidity. We examine the volume drawdown process and crash recovery measures in rolling-time windows to assess exposure to liquidity risk. The time-varying windows protect our financial indicators from the massive amount of volume transactions that characterize the opening and closing of the stock market. The empirical study is carried out for three Nasdaq-listed assets from April to September 2022. Firstly, we shape all of the volume time series using a weighted-indexed semi-Markov (WISMC) model, as well as the EGARCH and GJR models for comparisons. Next, we calculate drawdown-based risk measures on real and synthetic data, simulated from all the considered econometric models. Finally, we employ the Kullback-Leibler divergence to compare real and simulated risk indicators. Results reveal that the WISMC model reproduces all the drawdown-based risk measures better than the EGARCH and GJR models do for all the considered stocks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Finance and Data Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liquidity risk analysis via drawdown-based measures\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfds.2024.100138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Trading volumes are key variables in determining the degree of an asset's liquidity. We examine the volume drawdown process and crash recovery measures in rolling-time windows to assess exposure to liquidity risk. The time-varying windows protect our financial indicators from the massive amount of volume transactions that characterize the opening and closing of the stock market. The empirical study is carried out for three Nasdaq-listed assets from April to September 2022. Firstly, we shape all of the volume time series using a weighted-indexed semi-Markov (WISMC) model, as well as the EGARCH and GJR models for comparisons. Next, we calculate drawdown-based risk measures on real and synthetic data, simulated from all the considered econometric models. Finally, we employ the Kullback-Leibler divergence to compare real and simulated risk indicators. Results reveal that the WISMC model reproduces all the drawdown-based risk measures better than the EGARCH and GJR models do for all the considered stocks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Finance and Data Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Finance and Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405918824000230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Finance and Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405918824000230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交易量是决定资产流动性程度的关键变量。我们研究滚动时间窗口中的交易量缩减过程和暴跌恢复措施,以评估流动性风险敞口。时变窗口可以保护我们的金融指标不受股票市场开盘和收盘时大量交易量的影响。实证研究针对 2022 年 4 月至 9 月期间在纳斯达克上市的三种资产。首先,我们使用加权指数化半马尔科夫(WISMC)模型以及 EGARCH 和 GJR 模型对所有交易量时间序列进行塑造,以进行比较。接下来,我们根据所有考虑过的计量经济学模型模拟的真实数据和合成数据计算基于缩减的风险度量。最后,我们使用 Kullback-Leibler 发散度来比较真实和模拟风险指标。结果显示,就所有考虑的股票而言,WISMC 模型比 EGARCH 和 GJR 模型更好地再现了所有基于缩减的风险指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Liquidity risk analysis via drawdown-based measures
Trading volumes are key variables in determining the degree of an asset's liquidity. We examine the volume drawdown process and crash recovery measures in rolling-time windows to assess exposure to liquidity risk. The time-varying windows protect our financial indicators from the massive amount of volume transactions that characterize the opening and closing of the stock market. The empirical study is carried out for three Nasdaq-listed assets from April to September 2022. Firstly, we shape all of the volume time series using a weighted-indexed semi-Markov (WISMC) model, as well as the EGARCH and GJR models for comparisons. Next, we calculate drawdown-based risk measures on real and synthetic data, simulated from all the considered econometric models. Finally, we employ the Kullback-Leibler divergence to compare real and simulated risk indicators. Results reveal that the WISMC model reproduces all the drawdown-based risk measures better than the EGARCH and GJR models do for all the considered stocks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Finance and Data Science
Journal of Finance and Data Science Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
30 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信