对人工智能与人类体验的移情以及透明度在心理健康和社会支持聊天机器人设计中的作用:比较研究。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jmir Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.2196/62679
Jocelyn Shen, Daniella DiPaola, Safinah Ali, Maarten Sap, Hae Won Park, Cynthia Breazeal
{"title":"对人工智能与人类体验的移情以及透明度在心理健康和社会支持聊天机器人设计中的作用:比较研究。","authors":"Jocelyn Shen, Daniella DiPaola, Safinah Ali, Maarten Sap, Hae Won Park, Cynthia Breazeal","doi":"10.2196/62679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Empathy is a driving force in our connection to others, our mental well-being, and resilience to challenges. With the rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems, mental health chatbots, and AI social support companions, it is important to understand how empathy unfolds toward stories from human versus AI narrators and how transparency plays a role in user emotions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to understand how empathy shifts across human-written versus AI-written stories, and how these findings inform ethical implications and human-centered design of using mental health chatbots as objects of empathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted crowd-sourced studies with 985 participants who each wrote a personal story and then rated empathy toward 2 retrieved stories, where one was written by a language model, and another was written by a human. Our studies varied disclosing whether a story was written by a human or an AI system to see how transparent author information affects empathy toward the narrator. We conducted mixed methods analyses: through statistical tests, we compared user's self-reported state empathy toward the stories across different conditions. In addition, we qualitatively coded open-ended feedback about reactions to the stories to understand how and why transparency affects empathy toward human versus AI storytellers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that participants significantly empathized with human-written over AI-written stories in almost all conditions, regardless of whether they are aware (t<sub>196</sub>=7.07, P<.001, Cohen d=0.60) or not aware (t<sub>298</sub>=3.46, P<.001, Cohen d=0.24) that an AI system wrote the story. We also found that participants reported greater willingness to empathize with AI-written stories when there was transparency about the story author (t<sub>494</sub>=-5.49, P<.001, Cohen d=0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our work sheds light on how empathy toward AI or human narrators is tied to the way the text is presented, thus informing ethical considerations of empathetic artificial social support or mental health chatbots.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empathy Toward Artificial Intelligence Versus Human Experiences and the Role of Transparency in Mental Health and Social Support Chatbot Design: Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jocelyn Shen, Daniella DiPaola, Safinah Ali, Maarten Sap, Hae Won Park, Cynthia Breazeal\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/62679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Empathy is a driving force in our connection to others, our mental well-being, and resilience to challenges. With the rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems, mental health chatbots, and AI social support companions, it is important to understand how empathy unfolds toward stories from human versus AI narrators and how transparency plays a role in user emotions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to understand how empathy shifts across human-written versus AI-written stories, and how these findings inform ethical implications and human-centered design of using mental health chatbots as objects of empathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted crowd-sourced studies with 985 participants who each wrote a personal story and then rated empathy toward 2 retrieved stories, where one was written by a language model, and another was written by a human. Our studies varied disclosing whether a story was written by a human or an AI system to see how transparent author information affects empathy toward the narrator. We conducted mixed methods analyses: through statistical tests, we compared user's self-reported state empathy toward the stories across different conditions. In addition, we qualitatively coded open-ended feedback about reactions to the stories to understand how and why transparency affects empathy toward human versus AI storytellers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that participants significantly empathized with human-written over AI-written stories in almost all conditions, regardless of whether they are aware (t<sub>196</sub>=7.07, P<.001, Cohen d=0.60) or not aware (t<sub>298</sub>=3.46, P<.001, Cohen d=0.24) that an AI system wrote the story. We also found that participants reported greater willingness to empathize with AI-written stories when there was transparency about the story author (t<sub>494</sub>=-5.49, P<.001, Cohen d=0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our work sheds light on how empathy toward AI or human narrators is tied to the way the text is presented, thus informing ethical considerations of empathetic artificial social support or mental health chatbots.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jmir Mental Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jmir Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/62679\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jmir Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/62679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍同理心是我们与他人建立联系、获得心理健康和应对挑战的动力。随着生成式人工智能(AI)系统、心理健康聊天机器人和人工智能社交支持伴侣的兴起,了解共情如何在人类与人工智能叙述者的故事中展开,以及透明度如何在用户情感中发挥作用,显得尤为重要:我们旨在了解移情如何在人类编写的故事和人工智能编写的故事中发生转变,以及这些发现如何为将心理健康聊天机器人作为移情对象的伦理意义和以人为本的设计提供信息:我们对 985 名参与者进行了众包研究,他们每人都写了一个个人故事,然后对检索到的两个故事进行移情评级,其中一个故事是由语言模型编写的,另一个故事是由人类编写的。我们的研究对故事是由人类撰写还是由人工智能系统撰写进行了不同程度的披露,以了解透明的作者信息会如何影响对叙述者的移情。我们采用混合方法进行了分析:通过统计检验,我们比较了用户在不同条件下对故事的自述移情状态。此外,我们还对有关对故事的反应的开放式反馈进行了定性编码,以了解透明度如何以及为什么会影响对人类与人工智能讲故事者的共鸣:结果:我们发现,几乎在所有情况下,无论参与者是否知情,他们对人类编写的故事的共鸣都明显高于人工智能编写的故事(t196=7.07,P298=3.46,P494=-5.49,PC结论:我们的研究揭示了共鸣是如何影响人类与人工智能故事讲述者之间的关系的:我们的研究揭示了对人工智能或人类叙述者的移情是如何与文本呈现方式联系在一起的,从而为移情人工社会支持或心理健康聊天机器人的伦理考虑提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empathy Toward Artificial Intelligence Versus Human Experiences and the Role of Transparency in Mental Health and Social Support Chatbot Design: Comparative Study.

Background: Empathy is a driving force in our connection to others, our mental well-being, and resilience to challenges. With the rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems, mental health chatbots, and AI social support companions, it is important to understand how empathy unfolds toward stories from human versus AI narrators and how transparency plays a role in user emotions.

Objective: We aim to understand how empathy shifts across human-written versus AI-written stories, and how these findings inform ethical implications and human-centered design of using mental health chatbots as objects of empathy.

Methods: We conducted crowd-sourced studies with 985 participants who each wrote a personal story and then rated empathy toward 2 retrieved stories, where one was written by a language model, and another was written by a human. Our studies varied disclosing whether a story was written by a human or an AI system to see how transparent author information affects empathy toward the narrator. We conducted mixed methods analyses: through statistical tests, we compared user's self-reported state empathy toward the stories across different conditions. In addition, we qualitatively coded open-ended feedback about reactions to the stories to understand how and why transparency affects empathy toward human versus AI storytellers.

Results: We found that participants significantly empathized with human-written over AI-written stories in almost all conditions, regardless of whether they are aware (t196=7.07, P<.001, Cohen d=0.60) or not aware (t298=3.46, P<.001, Cohen d=0.24) that an AI system wrote the story. We also found that participants reported greater willingness to empathize with AI-written stories when there was transparency about the story author (t494=-5.49, P<.001, Cohen d=0.36).

Conclusions: Our work sheds light on how empathy toward AI or human narrators is tied to the way the text is presented, thus informing ethical considerations of empathetic artificial social support or mental health chatbots.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jmir Mental Health
Jmir Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
104
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Mental Health (JMH, ISSN 2368-7959) is a PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed sister journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR Mental Health focusses on digital health and Internet interventions, technologies and electronic innovations (software and hardware) for mental health, addictions, online counselling and behaviour change. This includes formative evaluation and system descriptions, theoretical papers, review papers, viewpoint/vision papers, and rigorous evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信