在法医心理健康环境中对妇女进行混合方法研究:作为研究者的护士的反思性叙述。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70038
Alison Hansen, Michael Hazelton, Robyn Rosina, Kerry J Inder
{"title":"在法医心理健康环境中对妇女进行混合方法研究:作为研究者的护士的反思性叙述。","authors":"Alison Hansen, Michael Hazelton, Robyn Rosina, Kerry J Inder","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe a reflexive account of a mental health nurse as researcher undertaking a mixed methods study as part of a doctoral degree, with women in a secure forensic hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A discursive paper that draws upon the primary author's experience of dual roles as a mental health nurse and a novice researcher, and relevant literature pertaining to positionality and reflexivity in the context of conducting mixed methods research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods study was conducted within a secure forensic hospital in Australia, to identify factors associated with the frequency and duration of seclusion for women and, to explore their experiences of seclusion. Notes and a reflective diary were used to demonstrate the reflexive approach and strategies used throughout the study design and data collection stages of the research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women in the secure forensic hospital setting often have complex histories and experiences and are considered a vulnerable group, which can add additional challenges when undertaking research with this population. As a doctoral student with clinical experience in mental health undertaking research in the forensic hospital setting with women, positionality and the connection with reflexivity requires exploration to understand self and the influence on research. This understanding along with identified strategies to enhance reflexivity, supports the management of the dual nurse as researcher roles to enhance all stages of the research process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Doctoral nursing candidates undertaking clinical research in their area of clinical practice and at the location of previous employment, may experience challenges in relation to identity and the dichotomy of roles. Further challenges can be posed when research involves complex populations and/or controversial practices. Support to balance role conflict and maintain reflexivity is critical to understanding the role of self in research and to enhance credibility.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or clinical practice: </strong>Women are a complex, yet minority population in forensic mental health settings, however the numbers of women being admitted to services is increasing. Future research may consider the use of the strategies explored here to enhance the reflexive process, and support future researchers in this field to conduct research that aims to support an often-misheard population to better support health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patient or public involvement: </strong>There was no patient or public contribution to this paper, however the study in which this paper is based on, is grounded in the experience of patients (women).</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"11 9","pages":"e70038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11432457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conducting mixed methods research with women in a forensic mental health setting: A reflexive account from a nurse as researcher.\",\"authors\":\"Alison Hansen, Michael Hazelton, Robyn Rosina, Kerry J Inder\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nop2.70038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe a reflexive account of a mental health nurse as researcher undertaking a mixed methods study as part of a doctoral degree, with women in a secure forensic hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A discursive paper that draws upon the primary author's experience of dual roles as a mental health nurse and a novice researcher, and relevant literature pertaining to positionality and reflexivity in the context of conducting mixed methods research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods study was conducted within a secure forensic hospital in Australia, to identify factors associated with the frequency and duration of seclusion for women and, to explore their experiences of seclusion. Notes and a reflective diary were used to demonstrate the reflexive approach and strategies used throughout the study design and data collection stages of the research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women in the secure forensic hospital setting often have complex histories and experiences and are considered a vulnerable group, which can add additional challenges when undertaking research with this population. As a doctoral student with clinical experience in mental health undertaking research in the forensic hospital setting with women, positionality and the connection with reflexivity requires exploration to understand self and the influence on research. This understanding along with identified strategies to enhance reflexivity, supports the management of the dual nurse as researcher roles to enhance all stages of the research process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Doctoral nursing candidates undertaking clinical research in their area of clinical practice and at the location of previous employment, may experience challenges in relation to identity and the dichotomy of roles. Further challenges can be posed when research involves complex populations and/or controversial practices. Support to balance role conflict and maintain reflexivity is critical to understanding the role of self in research and to enhance credibility.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or clinical practice: </strong>Women are a complex, yet minority population in forensic mental health settings, however the numbers of women being admitted to services is increasing. Future research may consider the use of the strategies explored here to enhance the reflexive process, and support future researchers in this field to conduct research that aims to support an often-misheard population to better support health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patient or public involvement: </strong>There was no patient or public contribution to this paper, however the study in which this paper is based on, is grounded in the experience of patients (women).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Open\",\"volume\":\"11 9\",\"pages\":\"e70038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11432457/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述一名心理健康护士作为研究者进行混合方法研究的反思性叙述,该研究是其博士学位的一部分,研究对象是一家安全法医医院中的女性:设计:这是一篇论述性论文,借鉴了主要作者作为心理健康护士和新手研究者的双重角色经验,以及在开展混合方法研究时与立场和反身性有关的相关文献:在澳大利亚的一家安全法医医院内开展了一项混合方法研究,以确定与女性隔离的频率和持续时间相关的因素,并探索她们的隔离体验。研究使用了笔记和反思日记来展示整个研究设计和数据收集阶段所使用的反思方法和策略:结果:在安全的法医医院环境中生活的女性往往有着复杂的历史和经历,被认为是弱势群体,这给针对这一群体的研究带来了额外的挑战。作为一名具有心理健康临床经验的博士生,在法医医院环境中对女性进行研究时,需要探索立场性以及与反思性之间的联系,以了解自我及其对研究的影响。这种认识以及所确定的增强反身性的策略,有助于管理作为研究者的双重护士角色,以加强研究过程的各个阶段:在其临床实践领域和先前工作地点开展临床研究的护理博士候选人可能会遇到与身份和角色二分法有关的挑战。当研究涉及复杂的人群和/或有争议的实践时,可能会面临更多挑战。为平衡角色冲突和保持反思性提供支持,对于理解自我在研究中的角色和提高可信度至关重要:女性是法医心理健康机构中的一个复杂群体,但也是一个少数群体,然而,接受服务的女性人数却在不断增加。未来的研究可以考虑使用本文探讨的策略来加强反思过程,并支持该领域未来的研究人员开展研究,旨在为经常被误解的人群提供支持,以更好地支持健康结果:患者或公众的参与:本文没有患者或公众的参与,但本文所依据的研究是以患者(女性)的经验为基础的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conducting mixed methods research with women in a forensic mental health setting: A reflexive account from a nurse as researcher.

Aims: To describe a reflexive account of a mental health nurse as researcher undertaking a mixed methods study as part of a doctoral degree, with women in a secure forensic hospital.

Design: A discursive paper that draws upon the primary author's experience of dual roles as a mental health nurse and a novice researcher, and relevant literature pertaining to positionality and reflexivity in the context of conducting mixed methods research.

Methods: A mixed methods study was conducted within a secure forensic hospital in Australia, to identify factors associated with the frequency and duration of seclusion for women and, to explore their experiences of seclusion. Notes and a reflective diary were used to demonstrate the reflexive approach and strategies used throughout the study design and data collection stages of the research.

Results: Women in the secure forensic hospital setting often have complex histories and experiences and are considered a vulnerable group, which can add additional challenges when undertaking research with this population. As a doctoral student with clinical experience in mental health undertaking research in the forensic hospital setting with women, positionality and the connection with reflexivity requires exploration to understand self and the influence on research. This understanding along with identified strategies to enhance reflexivity, supports the management of the dual nurse as researcher roles to enhance all stages of the research process.

Conclusion: Doctoral nursing candidates undertaking clinical research in their area of clinical practice and at the location of previous employment, may experience challenges in relation to identity and the dichotomy of roles. Further challenges can be posed when research involves complex populations and/or controversial practices. Support to balance role conflict and maintain reflexivity is critical to understanding the role of self in research and to enhance credibility.

Implications for the profession and/or clinical practice: Women are a complex, yet minority population in forensic mental health settings, however the numbers of women being admitted to services is increasing. Future research may consider the use of the strategies explored here to enhance the reflexive process, and support future researchers in this field to conduct research that aims to support an often-misheard population to better support health outcomes.

Patient or public involvement: There was no patient or public contribution to this paper, however the study in which this paper is based on, is grounded in the experience of patients (women).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信