为预测安哥拉患者临床病情恶化而开发新预警评分的共识:德尔菲研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/9070807
Esmael Tomás, Ana Escoval, Maria Lina Antunes
{"title":"为预测安哥拉患者临床病情恶化而开发新预警评分的共识:德尔菲研究。","authors":"Esmael Tomás, Ana Escoval, Maria Lina Antunes","doi":"10.1155/2024/9070807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Nearly 30 years since its inception, the early warning scores (EWSs) remain pivotal, yet variations have emerged for hospital and prehospital use. Aggregated scores, reflecting multiple physiological parameters, outperform single-parameter systems in assessing acute illness severity, though consensus on optimal approaches is lacking. Resource-limited countries, including Angola, lack adapted EWSs, emphasizing the need for cost-effective and adaptable solutions to enhance patient care. <b>Objective:</b> To explore the perspectives of Angolan experts to identify physiological parameters suitable for incorporation into existing EWSs, allowing the development of a new tool adjusted to the healthcare context in Angola. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a three-round Delphi survey, engaging a national expert panel comprising twenty-five physicians and nurses with expertise in internal medicine, surgery, emergency rooms, intensive care units, and/or teachers at universities or at teaching courses in these fields. Participants were asked to rate items using a five-point Likert scale. Consensus was achieved if the items received a rating ≥ 80% from the panel. <b>Results:</b> Consensus was evident for the inclusion of standard physiological parameters, such as systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, oxygen saturation, neurological status, and the presence or absence of supplemental oxygen. Furthermore, there was consensus for the consideration of specific items, namely, seizures, jaundice, cyanosis, capillary refill time, and pain-typically not included in the current EWSs. Consensus was reached regarding the exclusion of both oxygen saturation and temperature measurements in healthcare settings where oximeters and thermometers might not be readily available. <b>Conclusion:</b> Angolan experts were able to identify the physiological parameters suitable for incorporation into the basic EWSs. Further study must be conducted to test and validate the impact of the newly suggested vital parameters on the discriminant and predictive capability of a new aggregated model specifically adjusted to the Angolan healthcare setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus for the Development of a New Early Warning Score for Predicting Patients' Clinical Deterioration in Angola: A Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Esmael Tomás, Ana Escoval, Maria Lina Antunes\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/9070807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Nearly 30 years since its inception, the early warning scores (EWSs) remain pivotal, yet variations have emerged for hospital and prehospital use. Aggregated scores, reflecting multiple physiological parameters, outperform single-parameter systems in assessing acute illness severity, though consensus on optimal approaches is lacking. Resource-limited countries, including Angola, lack adapted EWSs, emphasizing the need for cost-effective and adaptable solutions to enhance patient care. <b>Objective:</b> To explore the perspectives of Angolan experts to identify physiological parameters suitable for incorporation into existing EWSs, allowing the development of a new tool adjusted to the healthcare context in Angola. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a three-round Delphi survey, engaging a national expert panel comprising twenty-five physicians and nurses with expertise in internal medicine, surgery, emergency rooms, intensive care units, and/or teachers at universities or at teaching courses in these fields. Participants were asked to rate items using a five-point Likert scale. Consensus was achieved if the items received a rating ≥ 80% from the panel. <b>Results:</b> Consensus was evident for the inclusion of standard physiological parameters, such as systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, oxygen saturation, neurological status, and the presence or absence of supplemental oxygen. Furthermore, there was consensus for the consideration of specific items, namely, seizures, jaundice, cyanosis, capillary refill time, and pain-typically not included in the current EWSs. Consensus was reached regarding the exclusion of both oxygen saturation and temperature measurements in healthcare settings where oximeters and thermometers might not be readily available. <b>Conclusion:</b> Angolan experts were able to identify the physiological parameters suitable for incorporation into the basic EWSs. Further study must be conducted to test and validate the impact of the newly suggested vital parameters on the discriminant and predictive capability of a new aggregated model specifically adjusted to the Angolan healthcare setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442038/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9070807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9070807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期预警评分(EWS)自问世以来已近 30 年,但在医院和院前使用时出现了差异。在评估急性病严重程度方面,反映多种生理参数的综合评分优于单一参数系统,但对最佳方法尚未达成共识。包括安哥拉在内的资源有限国家缺乏适用的 EWS 系统,因此强调需要成本效益高、适应性强的解决方案来加强对患者的护理。目标:探讨安哥拉专家的观点,以确定适合纳入现有EWS的生理参数,从而开发出适合安哥拉医疗环境的新工具。研究方法我们进行了三轮德尔菲调查,邀请了25名内科、外科、急诊室、重症监护室的医生和护士,以及/或大学或这些领域教学课程的教师组成全国专家小组。参与者被要求使用五点李克特量表对项目进行评分。如果小组对项目的评分≥80%,则达成共识。结果:在纳入标准生理参数(如收缩压、心率、呼吸频率、体温、血氧饱和度、神经系统状态以及是否补充氧气)方面达成了明显的共识。此外,在考虑特定项目方面也达成了共识,即癫痫发作、黄疸、紫绀、毛细血管再充盈时间和疼痛--这些项目通常不包括在当前的 EWS 中。在血氧饱和度和体温测量不适用的医疗环境中,由于血氧饱和度和体温测量仪可能无法随时使用,这一点已达成共识。结论:安哥拉专家能够确定适合纳入基本预警系统的生理参数。必须开展进一步研究,以测试和验证新建议的生命参数对专门针对安哥拉医疗环境调整的新综合模型的判别和预测能力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consensus for the Development of a New Early Warning Score for Predicting Patients' Clinical Deterioration in Angola: A Delphi Study.

Background: Nearly 30 years since its inception, the early warning scores (EWSs) remain pivotal, yet variations have emerged for hospital and prehospital use. Aggregated scores, reflecting multiple physiological parameters, outperform single-parameter systems in assessing acute illness severity, though consensus on optimal approaches is lacking. Resource-limited countries, including Angola, lack adapted EWSs, emphasizing the need for cost-effective and adaptable solutions to enhance patient care. Objective: To explore the perspectives of Angolan experts to identify physiological parameters suitable for incorporation into existing EWSs, allowing the development of a new tool adjusted to the healthcare context in Angola. Methods: We conducted a three-round Delphi survey, engaging a national expert panel comprising twenty-five physicians and nurses with expertise in internal medicine, surgery, emergency rooms, intensive care units, and/or teachers at universities or at teaching courses in these fields. Participants were asked to rate items using a five-point Likert scale. Consensus was achieved if the items received a rating ≥ 80% from the panel. Results: Consensus was evident for the inclusion of standard physiological parameters, such as systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, oxygen saturation, neurological status, and the presence or absence of supplemental oxygen. Furthermore, there was consensus for the consideration of specific items, namely, seizures, jaundice, cyanosis, capillary refill time, and pain-typically not included in the current EWSs. Consensus was reached regarding the exclusion of both oxygen saturation and temperature measurements in healthcare settings where oximeters and thermometers might not be readily available. Conclusion: Angolan experts were able to identify the physiological parameters suitable for incorporation into the basic EWSs. Further study must be conducted to test and validate the impact of the newly suggested vital parameters on the discriminant and predictive capability of a new aggregated model specifically adjusted to the Angolan healthcare setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信