{"title":"马来西亚急诊科的 \"不尝试复苏 \"决策导航:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"K S Chew, H T M Kho, X Y Yang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The practice of Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) aims to respect patient autonomy and acknowledge medical futility. Despite its global acceptance, there is limited research on DNAR in many Asian countries, including Malaysia. This study addressed this gap by exploring DNAR decision-making processes in a Malaysian tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed-method retrospective study was conducted in the emergency and trauma department (ETD) of Sarawak General Hospital, Malaysia, from February to July 2023. Data were collected from 115 DNAR cases using a surveillance form to document the patient demographics, types of DNAR orders, initiating physicians, reasons for DNAR, surrogate decision-makers, specific types of procedures withheld or withdrawn and outcomes. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data, while inferential statistical analysis was applied to quantitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 71.32 years, with a male predominance (63.5%). The primary reasons for DNAR included \"critical illness with poor prognosis\" (33.9%), \"advanced age with frailty and poor prognosis\" (20.9%) and \"massive haemorrhagic or ischemic stroke\" (16.5%). Most DNAR decisions involved withholding resuscitation (90.4%) and were initiated mainly by internal medicine (52.2%) and emergency medicine teams (34.8%). Surrogate decisionmakers were predominantly adult children (63.5%). Only one case had an advance directive. Majority of patients (80.9%) were admitted to wards, while 16.5% died in the emergency department. The median age of patients was significantly older when adult children (78 years) and spouses (76 years) were the surrogates, compared to when they were not involved (64.5 years and 62.5 years, respectively; p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Conversely, the median age was significantly younger when parents (41.5 years) and siblings (64 years) were the surrogates, compared to when they were not involved (75 years and 74 years, respectively; p < 0.001 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced directives are rarely applied in Malaysia. DNAR decisions are typically made by surrogates when patients are critically ill, which is a common trend in many Asian cultures where discussing death is taboo. Cultural norms often lead families to withhold terminal diagnoses from patients, posing challenges for end-of-life care. The most frequent surrogates were adult children, who face dilemmas balancing aggressive treatment and their parents' wishes. The study underscores the need for better communication and decision-making support in emergency departments.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation decisions in emergency department in Malaysia: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"K S Chew, H T M Kho, X Y Yang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The practice of Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) aims to respect patient autonomy and acknowledge medical futility. Despite its global acceptance, there is limited research on DNAR in many Asian countries, including Malaysia. This study addressed this gap by exploring DNAR decision-making processes in a Malaysian tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed-method retrospective study was conducted in the emergency and trauma department (ETD) of Sarawak General Hospital, Malaysia, from February to July 2023. Data were collected from 115 DNAR cases using a surveillance form to document the patient demographics, types of DNAR orders, initiating physicians, reasons for DNAR, surrogate decision-makers, specific types of procedures withheld or withdrawn and outcomes. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data, while inferential statistical analysis was applied to quantitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 71.32 years, with a male predominance (63.5%). The primary reasons for DNAR included \\\"critical illness with poor prognosis\\\" (33.9%), \\\"advanced age with frailty and poor prognosis\\\" (20.9%) and \\\"massive haemorrhagic or ischemic stroke\\\" (16.5%). Most DNAR decisions involved withholding resuscitation (90.4%) and were initiated mainly by internal medicine (52.2%) and emergency medicine teams (34.8%). Surrogate decisionmakers were predominantly adult children (63.5%). Only one case had an advance directive. Majority of patients (80.9%) were admitted to wards, while 16.5% died in the emergency department. The median age of patients was significantly older when adult children (78 years) and spouses (76 years) were the surrogates, compared to when they were not involved (64.5 years and 62.5 years, respectively; p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Conversely, the median age was significantly younger when parents (41.5 years) and siblings (64 years) were the surrogates, compared to when they were not involved (75 years and 74 years, respectively; p < 0.001 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced directives are rarely applied in Malaysia. DNAR decisions are typically made by surrogates when patients are critically ill, which is a common trend in many Asian cultures where discussing death is taboo. Cultural norms often lead families to withhold terminal diagnoses from patients, posing challenges for end-of-life care. The most frequent surrogates were adult children, who face dilemmas balancing aggressive treatment and their parents' wishes. The study underscores the need for better communication and decision-making support in emergency departments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Navigating Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation decisions in emergency department in Malaysia: A retrospective study.
Introduction: The practice of Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) aims to respect patient autonomy and acknowledge medical futility. Despite its global acceptance, there is limited research on DNAR in many Asian countries, including Malaysia. This study addressed this gap by exploring DNAR decision-making processes in a Malaysian tertiary hospital.
Materials and methods: A mixed-method retrospective study was conducted in the emergency and trauma department (ETD) of Sarawak General Hospital, Malaysia, from February to July 2023. Data were collected from 115 DNAR cases using a surveillance form to document the patient demographics, types of DNAR orders, initiating physicians, reasons for DNAR, surrogate decision-makers, specific types of procedures withheld or withdrawn and outcomes. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data, while inferential statistical analysis was applied to quantitative data.
Results: The mean age of patients was 71.32 years, with a male predominance (63.5%). The primary reasons for DNAR included "critical illness with poor prognosis" (33.9%), "advanced age with frailty and poor prognosis" (20.9%) and "massive haemorrhagic or ischemic stroke" (16.5%). Most DNAR decisions involved withholding resuscitation (90.4%) and were initiated mainly by internal medicine (52.2%) and emergency medicine teams (34.8%). Surrogate decisionmakers were predominantly adult children (63.5%). Only one case had an advance directive. Majority of patients (80.9%) were admitted to wards, while 16.5% died in the emergency department. The median age of patients was significantly older when adult children (78 years) and spouses (76 years) were the surrogates, compared to when they were not involved (64.5 years and 62.5 years, respectively; p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Conversely, the median age was significantly younger when parents (41.5 years) and siblings (64 years) were the surrogates, compared to when they were not involved (75 years and 74 years, respectively; p < 0.001 for both).
Conclusion: Advanced directives are rarely applied in Malaysia. DNAR decisions are typically made by surrogates when patients are critically ill, which is a common trend in many Asian cultures where discussing death is taboo. Cultural norms often lead families to withhold terminal diagnoses from patients, posing challenges for end-of-life care. The most frequent surrogates were adult children, who face dilemmas balancing aggressive treatment and their parents' wishes. The study underscores the need for better communication and decision-making support in emergency departments.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.