训练有素的护理经理的干预对日本长期护理服务使用者参与预先护理计划的影响:一项跨多个机构的试点前后比较研究。

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524241281065
Shozo Okochi, Kyoko Oshiro, Noriyasu Takeuchi, Mariko Miyamichi, Tomoe Nakamura, Terumi Matsushima, Masako Okada, Yoshimi Kudo, Takehiro Ishiyama, Tomoyasu Kinoshita, Hideki Kojima, Mitsunori Nishikawa
{"title":"训练有素的护理经理的干预对日本长期护理服务使用者参与预先护理计划的影响:一项跨多个机构的试点前后比较研究。","authors":"Shozo Okochi, Kyoko Oshiro, Noriyasu Takeuchi, Mariko Miyamichi, Tomoe Nakamura, Terumi Matsushima, Masako Okada, Yoshimi Kudo, Takehiro Ishiyama, Tomoyasu Kinoshita, Hideki Kojima, Mitsunori Nishikawa","doi":"10.1177/26323524241281065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A majority of Japanese care managers lack medical qualifications, feel uncomfortable discussing future medical choices and believe that it is not their responsibility.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>As there is a paucity of care manager intervention studies, this study aimed to measure changes in advance care planning engagement among long-term care service users before and after intervention by care managers with communication training.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multi-institutional pre- and post-pilot comparative study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-institutional pre- and post-trial study was performed from August 2022 to January 2023 (trial ID: 000048573). Nine trained care managers communicated with 30 long-term care service users regarding advance care planning, and the pre- and post-trial advance care planning engagement scores were compared. Additionally, the post-trial impact of events score was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 30 long-term care service users completed the trial. The advance care planning engagement score increased after the trial. The sample size was considered adequate for future trials. Years of experience as a care manager, impact of events score, and having a clinical frailty scale of ⩾5 were significant explanatory variables that affected the objective variable of the difference between pre- and post-trial advance care planning engagement score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study on the impact of advance care planning communication interventions by trained care managers offers insights into determining appropriate sample sizes and identifying factors influencing future research outcomes. Advance care planning engagement of long-term care service users might change before and after intervention by care managers through advance care planning communication.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>University Hospital Medical Information (UMIN) Network Trial ID: 000048573.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"18 ","pages":"26323524241281065"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of intervention by trained care managers on advance care planning engagement among long-term care service users in Japan: a pre- and post-pilot comparative study across multiple institutions.\",\"authors\":\"Shozo Okochi, Kyoko Oshiro, Noriyasu Takeuchi, Mariko Miyamichi, Tomoe Nakamura, Terumi Matsushima, Masako Okada, Yoshimi Kudo, Takehiro Ishiyama, Tomoyasu Kinoshita, Hideki Kojima, Mitsunori Nishikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26323524241281065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A majority of Japanese care managers lack medical qualifications, feel uncomfortable discussing future medical choices and believe that it is not their responsibility.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>As there is a paucity of care manager intervention studies, this study aimed to measure changes in advance care planning engagement among long-term care service users before and after intervention by care managers with communication training.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multi-institutional pre- and post-pilot comparative study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-institutional pre- and post-trial study was performed from August 2022 to January 2023 (trial ID: 000048573). Nine trained care managers communicated with 30 long-term care service users regarding advance care planning, and the pre- and post-trial advance care planning engagement scores were compared. Additionally, the post-trial impact of events score was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 30 long-term care service users completed the trial. The advance care planning engagement score increased after the trial. The sample size was considered adequate for future trials. Years of experience as a care manager, impact of events score, and having a clinical frailty scale of ⩾5 were significant explanatory variables that affected the objective variable of the difference between pre- and post-trial advance care planning engagement score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study on the impact of advance care planning communication interventions by trained care managers offers insights into determining appropriate sample sizes and identifying factors influencing future research outcomes. Advance care planning engagement of long-term care service users might change before and after intervention by care managers through advance care planning communication.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>University Hospital Medical Information (UMIN) Network Trial ID: 000048573.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"26323524241281065\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440549/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241281065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241281065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数日本护理管理者缺乏医疗资质,对讨论未来的医疗选择感到不自在,并认为这不是他们的责任:大多数日本护理经理缺乏医疗资格,对讨论未来的医疗选择感到不自在,并认为这不是他们的责任:由于护理管理者干预研究很少,本研究旨在测量护理管理者在接受沟通培训干预前后,长期护理服务使用者在预先护理计划参与方面的变化:设计:多机构试点前后对比研究:2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 1 月期间,开展了一项多机构试验前后对比研究(试验编号:000048573)。9 名经过培训的护理经理与 30 名长期护理服务使用者就预先护理计划进行了沟通,并对试验前后预先护理计划参与度评分进行了比较。此外,还对试验后的事件影响评分进行了调查:所有 30 名长期护理服务使用者都完成了试验。试验后,预先护理规划参与度得分有所提高。样本量足以满足未来试验的需要。担任护理经理的年限、事件影响得分以及临床虚弱量表⩾5 是影响预先护理规划参与度试验前和试验后得分差异这一客观变量的重要解释变量:这项关于由训练有素的护理经理进行预先护理规划沟通干预的影响的研究为确定适当的样本大小和识别影响未来研究成果的因素提供了启示。在护理经理通过预先护理计划沟通进行干预前后,长期护理服务使用者的预先护理计划参与度可能会发生变化:试验注册:大学医院医学信息(UMIN)网络试验编号:000048573。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of intervention by trained care managers on advance care planning engagement among long-term care service users in Japan: a pre- and post-pilot comparative study across multiple institutions.

Background: A majority of Japanese care managers lack medical qualifications, feel uncomfortable discussing future medical choices and believe that it is not their responsibility.

Objectives: As there is a paucity of care manager intervention studies, this study aimed to measure changes in advance care planning engagement among long-term care service users before and after intervention by care managers with communication training.

Design: A multi-institutional pre- and post-pilot comparative study.

Methods: A multi-institutional pre- and post-trial study was performed from August 2022 to January 2023 (trial ID: 000048573). Nine trained care managers communicated with 30 long-term care service users regarding advance care planning, and the pre- and post-trial advance care planning engagement scores were compared. Additionally, the post-trial impact of events score was investigated.

Results: All 30 long-term care service users completed the trial. The advance care planning engagement score increased after the trial. The sample size was considered adequate for future trials. Years of experience as a care manager, impact of events score, and having a clinical frailty scale of ⩾5 were significant explanatory variables that affected the objective variable of the difference between pre- and post-trial advance care planning engagement score.

Conclusion: This study on the impact of advance care planning communication interventions by trained care managers offers insights into determining appropriate sample sizes and identifying factors influencing future research outcomes. Advance care planning engagement of long-term care service users might change before and after intervention by care managers through advance care planning communication.

Trial registration: University Hospital Medical Information (UMIN) Network Trial ID: 000048573.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信