急诊医学项目信号:2022-2023 年项目主任经验。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Alexis E Pelletier-Bui, Timothy Fallon, Liza Smith, Tania Strout, Michelle Fischer, Mark Olaf, Erin McDonough, Brian Barbas, Michael Cirone, Elizabeth Barrall Werley
{"title":"急诊医学项目信号:2022-2023 年项目主任经验。","authors":"Alexis E Pelletier-Bui, Timothy Fallon, Liza Smith, Tania Strout, Michelle Fischer, Mark Olaf, Erin McDonough, Brian Barbas, Michael Cirone, Elizabeth Barrall Werley","doi":"10.5811/westjem.19392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Program signaling (PS), which enables residency applicants to signal their preference for a specific program, was introduced in emergency medicine (EM) in the 2022-2023 residency application cycle. In this study we evaluated EM program directors' (PD) utilization of PS in application review and ranking. This study also explores the relationship between program characteristics and number of signals received as well as the relative importance and utilization of signals related to the number of signals received.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an institutional review board-approved, cross-sectional study of PDs at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited EM residency programs. We used descriptive statistics to describe the characteristics of residency programs and practices around PS. Measures of central tendency and dispersion summarized continuous variables. We used chi-square analysis or the Fisher exact test for comparisons between groups for categorical variables. Comparisons for continuous variables were made using the <i>t</i>-test for independent samples or analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 41% (n = 113/277 EM programs). Most programs participated in PS (n = 261/277 EM programs, 94.2%). Mean number of signals received was 60 (range 2-203). Signals received varied based on program characteristics including geographic location and program type, duration, environment, and longevity. Most used PS in holistic review (52.2%), but other uses varied by proportion of applications that were signaled. The importance of PS in application review (mean 2.9; 1-5 scale, 1 = not important, 5 = extremely important) and rank list preparation (2.1) was relatively low compared to other application elements such as standardized letters of evaluation (4.97 for review, 4.90 for ranking).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides insights into PS utilization in EM's inaugural year. We have identified patterns of signal use based on program characteristics and number of signals received that can inform signal allocation and utilization on an individual applicant and program level. A more nuanced understanding of signal use can provide valuable insight as the specialty of EM grapples with fluctuations in its applicant numbers and shifting demographics of its applicant pool.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Program Signaling in Emergency Medicine: The 2022-2023 Program Director Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Alexis E Pelletier-Bui, Timothy Fallon, Liza Smith, Tania Strout, Michelle Fischer, Mark Olaf, Erin McDonough, Brian Barbas, Michael Cirone, Elizabeth Barrall Werley\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.19392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Program signaling (PS), which enables residency applicants to signal their preference for a specific program, was introduced in emergency medicine (EM) in the 2022-2023 residency application cycle. In this study we evaluated EM program directors' (PD) utilization of PS in application review and ranking. This study also explores the relationship between program characteristics and number of signals received as well as the relative importance and utilization of signals related to the number of signals received.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an institutional review board-approved, cross-sectional study of PDs at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited EM residency programs. We used descriptive statistics to describe the characteristics of residency programs and practices around PS. Measures of central tendency and dispersion summarized continuous variables. We used chi-square analysis or the Fisher exact test for comparisons between groups for categorical variables. Comparisons for continuous variables were made using the <i>t</i>-test for independent samples or analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 41% (n = 113/277 EM programs). Most programs participated in PS (n = 261/277 EM programs, 94.2%). Mean number of signals received was 60 (range 2-203). Signals received varied based on program characteristics including geographic location and program type, duration, environment, and longevity. Most used PS in holistic review (52.2%), but other uses varied by proportion of applications that were signaled. The importance of PS in application review (mean 2.9; 1-5 scale, 1 = not important, 5 = extremely important) and rank list preparation (2.1) was relatively low compared to other application elements such as standardized letters of evaluation (4.97 for review, 4.90 for ranking).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides insights into PS utilization in EM's inaugural year. We have identified patterns of signal use based on program characteristics and number of signals received that can inform signal allocation and utilization on an individual applicant and program level. A more nuanced understanding of signal use can provide valuable insight as the specialty of EM grapples with fluctuations in its applicant numbers and shifting demographics of its applicant pool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418878/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.19392\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.19392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在 2022-2023 年住院医师培训申请周期中,急诊医学(EM)引入了 "项目信号"(Program signaling,简称 PS),使住院医师培训申请者能够表明他们对特定项目的偏好。在本研究中,我们评估了急诊医学项目主任(PD)在申请审核和排名中对PS的使用情况。本研究还探讨了项目特征与收到的信号数量之间的关系,以及与收到的信号数量相关的信号的相对重要性和利用率:这是一项经机构审查委员会批准的横断面研究,研究对象是经毕业医学教育认证委员会(Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education)认证的电磁学住院医师培训项目中的PDs。我们使用描述性统计来描述住院医师培训项目的特点和围绕PS的实践。中心倾向和离散度量总结了连续变量。对于分类变量,我们采用卡方分析或费雪精确检验进行组间比较。连续变量的比较采用独立样本 t 检验或方差分析:回复率为 41%(n = 113/277)。大多数项目参与了 PS(n = 261/277 EM 项目,94.2%)。收到信号的平均数量为 60 个(范围为 2-203 个)。收到的信号因项目特点而异,包括地理位置和项目类型、持续时间、环境和寿命。大多数人在整体审查中使用 PS(52.2%),但其他用途因收到信号的申请比例而异。与标准化评估信等其他申请要素相比, PS 在申请审核(平均 2.9;1-5 级,1 = 不重要,5 = 极其重要)和排名表准备(2.1)中的重要性相对较低(审核 4.97,排名 4.90):本研究提供了对电磁学就职之年 PS 使用情况的深入了解。我们根据项目特点和收到的信号数量确定了信号的使用模式,可以为个别申请人和项目的信号分配和使用提供参考。在 EM 专业应对申请人数的波动和申请者人口结构的变化时,对信号使用的更细致的了解可以提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Program Signaling in Emergency Medicine: The 2022-2023 Program Director Experience.

Introduction: Program signaling (PS), which enables residency applicants to signal their preference for a specific program, was introduced in emergency medicine (EM) in the 2022-2023 residency application cycle. In this study we evaluated EM program directors' (PD) utilization of PS in application review and ranking. This study also explores the relationship between program characteristics and number of signals received as well as the relative importance and utilization of signals related to the number of signals received.

Methods: This is an institutional review board-approved, cross-sectional study of PDs at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited EM residency programs. We used descriptive statistics to describe the characteristics of residency programs and practices around PS. Measures of central tendency and dispersion summarized continuous variables. We used chi-square analysis or the Fisher exact test for comparisons between groups for categorical variables. Comparisons for continuous variables were made using the t-test for independent samples or analysis of variance.

Results: The response rate was 41% (n = 113/277 EM programs). Most programs participated in PS (n = 261/277 EM programs, 94.2%). Mean number of signals received was 60 (range 2-203). Signals received varied based on program characteristics including geographic location and program type, duration, environment, and longevity. Most used PS in holistic review (52.2%), but other uses varied by proportion of applications that were signaled. The importance of PS in application review (mean 2.9; 1-5 scale, 1 = not important, 5 = extremely important) and rank list preparation (2.1) was relatively low compared to other application elements such as standardized letters of evaluation (4.97 for review, 4.90 for ranking).

Conclusion: The study provides insights into PS utilization in EM's inaugural year. We have identified patterns of signal use based on program characteristics and number of signals received that can inform signal allocation and utilization on an individual applicant and program level. A more nuanced understanding of signal use can provide valuable insight as the specialty of EM grapples with fluctuations in its applicant numbers and shifting demographics of its applicant pool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信