STEMI 患者从抵达到离开的 10 分钟时间指标的可行性。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Joshua Gross, Luke Schuh, Timothy Lenz
{"title":"STEMI 患者从抵达到离开的 10 分钟时间指标的可行性。","authors":"Joshua Gross, Luke Schuh, Timothy Lenz","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2407911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Delays in reperfusion treatment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients leads to higher morbidity and mortality. Previous reports for Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) suggests a 10-minute skid-to-skid (arrival to departure) time to achieve appropriate reperfusion times. However, there is no published data on whether this goal is achievable for a HEMS service. This study aims to see if a midwestern critical care service can consistently achieve a 10-minute helicopter skid-to-skid time or ground critical care service arrival to departure time. Further, comparing this metric between ground and helicopter transportations will help evaluate the ideal transportation method to optimize time to percutaneous intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective chart review utilizing 10 years of data from our ground and HEMS program to assess whether a 10-minute arrival to departure time for STEMI patients could be achieved. Patients included were at least 18 years of age and were transported from the referring facility for further STEMI management. Wilcoxon rank sum test and Chi-square tests were used to evaluate data between helicopter and ground services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included in the study were 686 patients, 608 by helicopter transport and 78 by ground transport. The median arrival to departure time was 14 min (IQR = 5) for helicopter patients and 13 min (IQR = 6) for ground patients. There was not a statistically significant difference in this metric for STEMI patients transported by helicopter versus ground. A statistically significant difference, though, existed between helicopter and ground transports among percent with times less than or equal to 10 min versus percent times greater than 10 min, X<sup>2</sup> = 5.46, df = 1, <i>p</i> = 0.02. Two referring facilities had statistically significant differences in median arrival to departure times.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that a median EMS arrival to departure time of 10 min to transport STEMI patients was not consistently achieved <i>via</i> either helicopter or ground transportation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of 10-Minute Arrival Time to Departure Time Metric for STEMI Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Gross, Luke Schuh, Timothy Lenz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2407911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Delays in reperfusion treatment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients leads to higher morbidity and mortality. Previous reports for Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) suggests a 10-minute skid-to-skid (arrival to departure) time to achieve appropriate reperfusion times. However, there is no published data on whether this goal is achievable for a HEMS service. This study aims to see if a midwestern critical care service can consistently achieve a 10-minute helicopter skid-to-skid time or ground critical care service arrival to departure time. Further, comparing this metric between ground and helicopter transportations will help evaluate the ideal transportation method to optimize time to percutaneous intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective chart review utilizing 10 years of data from our ground and HEMS program to assess whether a 10-minute arrival to departure time for STEMI patients could be achieved. Patients included were at least 18 years of age and were transported from the referring facility for further STEMI management. Wilcoxon rank sum test and Chi-square tests were used to evaluate data between helicopter and ground services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included in the study were 686 patients, 608 by helicopter transport and 78 by ground transport. The median arrival to departure time was 14 min (IQR = 5) for helicopter patients and 13 min (IQR = 6) for ground patients. There was not a statistically significant difference in this metric for STEMI patients transported by helicopter versus ground. A statistically significant difference, though, existed between helicopter and ground transports among percent with times less than or equal to 10 min versus percent times greater than 10 min, X<sup>2</sup> = 5.46, df = 1, <i>p</i> = 0.02. Two referring facilities had statistically significant differences in median arrival to departure times.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that a median EMS arrival to departure time of 10 min to transport STEMI patients was not consistently achieved <i>via</i> either helicopter or ground transportation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2407911\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2407911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:ST 段抬高型心肌梗塞(STEMI)患者再灌注治疗的延迟会导致更高的发病率和死亡率。之前关于直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)的报告显示,10 分钟的滑行到滑行(到达到离开)时间可实现适当的再灌注时间。本研究旨在了解中西部重症监护服务是否能持续达到直升机 10 分钟滑行到滑行时间或地面重症监护服务到达到离开时间。此外,比较地面和直升机运送的这一指标将有助于评估理想的运送方法,以优化经皮介入治疗(PCI)的时间:这是一项回顾性病历审查,利用了我们的地面和直升机急救项目 10 年来的数据,以评估 STEMI 患者从到达到离开的时间是否能达到 10 分钟。纳入的患者至少年满 18 周岁,并从转诊机构转运至医院接受进一步的 STEMI 治疗。采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验和卡方检验来评估直升机和地面服务之间的数据:研究共纳入 686 名患者,其中 608 人由直升机转运,78 人由地面转运。直升机病人从到达到离开的中位时间为 14 分钟(IQR = 5),地面病人为 13 分钟(IQR = 6)。直升机和地面转运的 STEMI 患者在这一指标上没有明显的统计学差异。不过,直升机和地面转运在时间小于或等于 10 分钟的百分比与时间大于 10 分钟的百分比之间存在统计学意义上的显著差异,X2 = 5.46,df = 1,p = 0.02。两家转诊机构从到达到离开的时间中位数差异具有统计学意义:我们的研究发现,无论是直升机还是地面运输,运送 STEMI 患者的 EMS 到达到离开时间中位数均未达到 10 分钟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of 10-Minute Arrival Time to Departure Time Metric for STEMI Patients.

Objectives: Delays in reperfusion treatment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients leads to higher morbidity and mortality. Previous reports for Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) suggests a 10-minute skid-to-skid (arrival to departure) time to achieve appropriate reperfusion times. However, there is no published data on whether this goal is achievable for a HEMS service. This study aims to see if a midwestern critical care service can consistently achieve a 10-minute helicopter skid-to-skid time or ground critical care service arrival to departure time. Further, comparing this metric between ground and helicopter transportations will help evaluate the ideal transportation method to optimize time to percutaneous intervention (PCI).

Methods: This was a retrospective chart review utilizing 10 years of data from our ground and HEMS program to assess whether a 10-minute arrival to departure time for STEMI patients could be achieved. Patients included were at least 18 years of age and were transported from the referring facility for further STEMI management. Wilcoxon rank sum test and Chi-square tests were used to evaluate data between helicopter and ground services.

Results: Included in the study were 686 patients, 608 by helicopter transport and 78 by ground transport. The median arrival to departure time was 14 min (IQR = 5) for helicopter patients and 13 min (IQR = 6) for ground patients. There was not a statistically significant difference in this metric for STEMI patients transported by helicopter versus ground. A statistically significant difference, though, existed between helicopter and ground transports among percent with times less than or equal to 10 min versus percent times greater than 10 min, X2 = 5.46, df = 1, p = 0.02. Two referring facilities had statistically significant differences in median arrival to departure times.

Conclusions: Our study found that a median EMS arrival to departure time of 10 min to transport STEMI patients was not consistently achieved via either helicopter or ground transportation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信