为紧急医疗服务临床医生开发临床判断项目。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Paul Rosenberger, Kenneth W Navarro, Christopher B Gage, Mihaiela R Gugiu, Nadine Lebarron McBride, Jonathan R Powell, Ashish R Panchal
{"title":"为紧急医疗服务临床医生开发临床判断项目。","authors":"Paul Rosenberger, Kenneth W Navarro, Christopher B Gage, Mihaiela R Gugiu, Nadine Lebarron McBride, Jonathan R Powell, Ashish R Panchal","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2409976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>While clinical judgment is vital for all clinicians, it is not clearly assessed in initial or continuing emergency medical services (EMS) education due to unclear definitions. Recently, clarity of this concept has been provided through the development of a theoretical framework for clinical judgment in EMS that considers the broad and evolving nature of prehospital care delivery. To facilitate standardization of clinical judgment assessments, in this educational practice review we present a template for item development leveraging the new framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed this template with input from EMS clinicians, educators, and subject matter experts from the nursing field with experience in clinical judgment item development. This template includes the basic cognitive steps of EMS clinical judgment, including recognizing cues, analyzing cues, defining a hypothesis, generating solutions, taking action, and evaluating the outcomes of those actions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We provide a transparent and reproducible template for item generation for clinical judgment assessments evaluating the six basic cognitive reasoning steps. Further, we provide a fully developed example of template application using a hypoglycemic patient case. This template can be used to support item generation for specific event phases (e.g., en route, scene, and post scene) in a clinical scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This template allows for generation of items for each EMS event phase that can be repeated serially for any combination of prehospital clinical situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Judgment Item Development for Emergency Medical Service Clinicians.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Rosenberger, Kenneth W Navarro, Christopher B Gage, Mihaiela R Gugiu, Nadine Lebarron McBride, Jonathan R Powell, Ashish R Panchal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2409976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>While clinical judgment is vital for all clinicians, it is not clearly assessed in initial or continuing emergency medical services (EMS) education due to unclear definitions. Recently, clarity of this concept has been provided through the development of a theoretical framework for clinical judgment in EMS that considers the broad and evolving nature of prehospital care delivery. To facilitate standardization of clinical judgment assessments, in this educational practice review we present a template for item development leveraging the new framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed this template with input from EMS clinicians, educators, and subject matter experts from the nursing field with experience in clinical judgment item development. This template includes the basic cognitive steps of EMS clinical judgment, including recognizing cues, analyzing cues, defining a hypothesis, generating solutions, taking action, and evaluating the outcomes of those actions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We provide a transparent and reproducible template for item generation for clinical judgment assessments evaluating the six basic cognitive reasoning steps. Further, we provide a fully developed example of template application using a hypoglycemic patient case. This template can be used to support item generation for specific event phases (e.g., en route, scene, and post scene) in a clinical scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This template allows for generation of items for each EMS event phase that can be repeated serially for any combination of prehospital clinical situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2409976\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2409976","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然临床判断对所有临床医生都至关重要,但由于定义不明确,在急救医疗服务(EMS)的初始或继续教育中并未对其进行明确评估。最近,考虑到院前医疗服务的广泛性和不断发展性,通过制定急救医疗服务临床判断的理论框架,对这一概念进行了明确:为了促进临床判断评估的标准化,我们在这篇教育实践综述中介绍了一个利用新框架进行项目开发的模板。该模板由急救医疗服务临床医生、教育工作者以及具有临床判断项目开发经验的护理领域专家共同开发,可用于支持在临床场景中特定事件阶段(如途中、现场和现场后)的项目生成:我们提供了一个透明、可重复的模板,用于生成临床判断评估项目,评估六个基本认知推理步骤,即识别线索、分析线索、定义假设、生成解决方案、采取行动和评估这些行动的结果:该模板可为每个急救医疗事件阶段生成项目,并可针对院前临床情况的任何组合进行连续重复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Judgment Item Development for Emergency Medical Service Clinicians.

Objectives: While clinical judgment is vital for all clinicians, it is not clearly assessed in initial or continuing emergency medical services (EMS) education due to unclear definitions. Recently, clarity of this concept has been provided through the development of a theoretical framework for clinical judgment in EMS that considers the broad and evolving nature of prehospital care delivery. To facilitate standardization of clinical judgment assessments, in this educational practice review we present a template for item development leveraging the new framework.

Methods: We developed this template with input from EMS clinicians, educators, and subject matter experts from the nursing field with experience in clinical judgment item development. This template includes the basic cognitive steps of EMS clinical judgment, including recognizing cues, analyzing cues, defining a hypothesis, generating solutions, taking action, and evaluating the outcomes of those actions.

Results: We provide a transparent and reproducible template for item generation for clinical judgment assessments evaluating the six basic cognitive reasoning steps. Further, we provide a fully developed example of template application using a hypoglycemic patient case. This template can be used to support item generation for specific event phases (e.g., en route, scene, and post scene) in a clinical scenario.

Conclusions: This template allows for generation of items for each EMS event phase that can be repeated serially for any combination of prehospital clinical situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信