基于血清蛋白生物标志物的结直肠癌和晚期腺瘤筛查进展如何?系统综述。

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Molecular Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1002/1878-0261.13734
Adrien Grancher, Steven Cuissy, Hélène Girot, André Gillibert, Frédéric Di Fiore, Lydia Guittet
{"title":"基于血清蛋白生物标志物的结直肠癌和晚期腺瘤筛查进展如何?系统综述。","authors":"Adrien Grancher, Steven Cuissy, Hélène Girot, André Gillibert, Frédéric Di Fiore, Lydia Guittet","doi":"10.1002/1878-0261.13734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been proven to reduce both mortality and the incidence of this disease. Most CRC screening programs are based on fecal immunochemical tests (FITs), which have a low participation rate. Searching for blood protein biomarkers can lead to the development of a more accepted screening test. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the diagnostic potential of the most promising serum protein biomarkers. A systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases between January 2010 and December 2023. Studies assessing blood protein biomarkers for CRC screening were included. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve of each biomarker were collected. Among 4685 screened studies, 94 were considered for analysis. Most of them were case-control studies, leading to an overestimation of the performance of candidate biomarkers. The performance of no protein biomarker or combination of biomarkers appears to match that of the FIT. Studies with a suitable design and population, testing new assay techniques, or based on algorithms combining FIT with serum tests are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18764,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2629-2648"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where do we stand with screening for colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma based on serum protein biomarkers? A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Adrien Grancher, Steven Cuissy, Hélène Girot, André Gillibert, Frédéric Di Fiore, Lydia Guittet\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1878-0261.13734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been proven to reduce both mortality and the incidence of this disease. Most CRC screening programs are based on fecal immunochemical tests (FITs), which have a low participation rate. Searching for blood protein biomarkers can lead to the development of a more accepted screening test. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the diagnostic potential of the most promising serum protein biomarkers. A systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases between January 2010 and December 2023. Studies assessing blood protein biomarkers for CRC screening were included. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve of each biomarker were collected. Among 4685 screened studies, 94 were considered for analysis. Most of them were case-control studies, leading to an overestimation of the performance of candidate biomarkers. The performance of no protein biomarker or combination of biomarkers appears to match that of the FIT. Studies with a suitable design and population, testing new assay techniques, or based on algorithms combining FIT with serum tests are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2629-2648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547240/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13734\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13734","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事实证明,大肠癌(CRC)筛查可以降低死亡率和发病率。大多数 CRC 筛查项目都基于粪便免疫化学检验 (FIT),这种检验的参与率很低。寻找血液蛋白生物标志物可以开发出一种更容易接受的筛查检验方法。本系统综述旨在比较最有前景的血清蛋白生物标志物的诊断潜力。2010 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间,根据 PRISMA 指南在 PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了系统性综述。纳入的研究评估了用于 CRC 筛查的血液蛋白生物标志物。收集了每种生物标志物的灵敏度、特异性和 ROC 曲线下面积。在 4685 项筛选出的研究中,有 94 项被考虑用于分析。这些研究大多是病例对照研究,因此高估了候选生物标志物的性能。没有一种蛋白质生物标志物或生物标志物组合的性能似乎与 FIT 相匹配。有必要进行设计和人群合适的研究,测试新的检测技术,或基于将 FIT 与血清检测相结合的算法进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Where do we stand with screening for colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma based on serum protein biomarkers? A systematic review.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been proven to reduce both mortality and the incidence of this disease. Most CRC screening programs are based on fecal immunochemical tests (FITs), which have a low participation rate. Searching for blood protein biomarkers can lead to the development of a more accepted screening test. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the diagnostic potential of the most promising serum protein biomarkers. A systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases between January 2010 and December 2023. Studies assessing blood protein biomarkers for CRC screening were included. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve of each biomarker were collected. Among 4685 screened studies, 94 were considered for analysis. Most of them were case-control studies, leading to an overestimation of the performance of candidate biomarkers. The performance of no protein biomarker or combination of biomarkers appears to match that of the FIT. Studies with a suitable design and population, testing new assay techniques, or based on algorithms combining FIT with serum tests are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Oncology
Molecular Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
203
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Oncology highlights new discoveries, approaches, and technical developments, in basic, clinical and discovery-driven translational cancer research. It publishes research articles, reviews (by invitation only), and timely science policy articles. The journal is now fully Open Access with all articles published over the past 10 years freely available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信