儿科癌症患者常用诊断性活检技术比较:APSA癌症委员会的系统回顾。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Martha Teke, Barrie S Rich, Ashley Walther, Dana Schwartz, Lucas A McDuffie, Gisela Butera, Jonathan P Roach, David H Rothstein, Dave R Lal, Kimberly Riehle, Andres Espinoza, Nicholas Cost, Elisabeth Tracy, David Rodeberg, Timothy Lautz, Jennifer H Aldrink, Erin G Brown
{"title":"儿科癌症患者常用诊断性活检技术比较:APSA癌症委员会的系统回顾。","authors":"Martha Teke, Barrie S Rich, Ashley Walther, Dana Schwartz, Lucas A McDuffie, Gisela Butera, Jonathan P Roach, David H Rothstein, Dave R Lal, Kimberly Riehle, Andres Espinoza, Nicholas Cost, Elisabeth Tracy, David Rodeberg, Timothy Lautz, Jennifer H Aldrink, Erin G Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historically, surgical biopsy (SB) for diagnosis of pediatric solid tumors was considered necessary to provide adequate tissue for histologic and molecular analysis. Less invasive biopsy techniques such as image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB), have shown comparable accuracy with decreased morbidity in some adult studies. However, data regarding the safety and efficacy of CNB in pediatric tumors is limited. This study's aim was to assess the overall rate of successful diagnosis and safety of CNB compared to SB in children with malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA compliant systematic review was performed in MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase and CINAHL Plus database searches from 2010 to 2023. Studies were included with relevance to the following clinical question: For children with concern for malignancy requiring biopsy for diagnosis, how does CNB compare to open or laparoscopic/thoracoscopic SB in terms of safety and diagnostic efficacy? Data for patients ≤21 years requiring biopsy for diagnosis of liver tumors, neuroblastoma (NB), soft tissue sarcoma (STS), and lymphoma were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven studies including 2477 patients met inclusion criteria, with 2065 undergoing CNB and 412 SB. Of the 2477 patients, 820 patients had NB, 307 liver tumors, 96 STS, 151 lymphoma, and 1103 patients were from studies that included multiple diagnoses. The average complication rate for CNB was 2.9% compared to 21.4% for SB (p < 0.001). Bleeding was the most common complication in both groups, but significantly higher after SB (22.1% vs 2.3%) (p < 0.001). CNB was diagnostic in 90.8% of patients compared to 98.8% who underwent SB (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rates of successful diagnosis were greater than 90% for both CNB and SB, though significantly higher for SB. Conversely, complication rates were close to ten times higher after SB compared to CNB. Given its relatively lower risk profile, CNB can be a safe and useful diagnostic tool for children with solid malignancies. Research focused on enhancing CNB's diagnostic accuracy while maintaining low morbidity should be further explored.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Treatment study, Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":" ","pages":"161893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Commonly Utilized Diagnostic Biopsy Techniques for Pediatric Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review by the APSA Cancer Committee.\",\"authors\":\"Martha Teke, Barrie S Rich, Ashley Walther, Dana Schwartz, Lucas A McDuffie, Gisela Butera, Jonathan P Roach, David H Rothstein, Dave R Lal, Kimberly Riehle, Andres Espinoza, Nicholas Cost, Elisabeth Tracy, David Rodeberg, Timothy Lautz, Jennifer H Aldrink, Erin G Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historically, surgical biopsy (SB) for diagnosis of pediatric solid tumors was considered necessary to provide adequate tissue for histologic and molecular analysis. Less invasive biopsy techniques such as image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB), have shown comparable accuracy with decreased morbidity in some adult studies. However, data regarding the safety and efficacy of CNB in pediatric tumors is limited. This study's aim was to assess the overall rate of successful diagnosis and safety of CNB compared to SB in children with malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA compliant systematic review was performed in MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase and CINAHL Plus database searches from 2010 to 2023. Studies were included with relevance to the following clinical question: For children with concern for malignancy requiring biopsy for diagnosis, how does CNB compare to open or laparoscopic/thoracoscopic SB in terms of safety and diagnostic efficacy? Data for patients ≤21 years requiring biopsy for diagnosis of liver tumors, neuroblastoma (NB), soft tissue sarcoma (STS), and lymphoma were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven studies including 2477 patients met inclusion criteria, with 2065 undergoing CNB and 412 SB. Of the 2477 patients, 820 patients had NB, 307 liver tumors, 96 STS, 151 lymphoma, and 1103 patients were from studies that included multiple diagnoses. The average complication rate for CNB was 2.9% compared to 21.4% for SB (p < 0.001). Bleeding was the most common complication in both groups, but significantly higher after SB (22.1% vs 2.3%) (p < 0.001). CNB was diagnostic in 90.8% of patients compared to 98.8% who underwent SB (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rates of successful diagnosis were greater than 90% for both CNB and SB, though significantly higher for SB. Conversely, complication rates were close to ten times higher after SB compared to CNB. Given its relatively lower risk profile, CNB can be a safe and useful diagnostic tool for children with solid malignancies. Research focused on enhancing CNB's diagnostic accuracy while maintaining low morbidity should be further explored.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Treatment study, Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"161893\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161893\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161893","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一直以来,为了给组织学和分子分析提供足够的组织,诊断小儿实体瘤必须进行外科活检(SB)。在一些成人研究中,图像引导的核心针活检(CNB)等创伤较小的活检技术已显示出可比的准确性并降低了发病率。然而,有关CNB在儿科肿瘤中的安全性和有效性的数据还很有限。本研究旨在评估CNB与SB相比在儿童恶性肿瘤中的总体诊断成功率和安全性:方法:2010 年至 2023 年期间,通过 PubMed、Embase 和 CINAHL Plus 数据库在 MEDLINE 上进行了符合 PRISMA 标准的系统性综述。纳入了与以下临床问题相关的研究:对于疑似恶性肿瘤需要活检诊断的儿童,CNB 与开腹或腹腔镜/胸腔镜 SB 在安全性和诊断效果方面的比较如何?研究纳入了21岁以下需要活检诊断肝肿瘤、神经母细胞瘤(NB)、软组织肉瘤(STS)和淋巴瘤患者的数据:共有27项研究,2477名患者符合纳入标准,其中2065人接受了CNB,412人接受了SB。在2477名患者中,820名患者患有NB,307名患者患有肝脏肿瘤,96名患者患有STS,151名患者患有淋巴瘤,1103名患者来自包含多种诊断的研究。CNB 的平均并发症发生率为 2.9%,而 SB 为 21.4%(P,结论):CNB 和 SB 的成功诊断率均超过 90%,但 SB 的成功诊断率明显更高。相反,与 CNB 相比,SB 的并发症发生率高出近 10 倍。鉴于 CNB 的风险相对较低,它可以成为实体恶性肿瘤患儿安全、有用的诊断工具。应进一步探讨如何在保持低发病率的同时提高 CNB 的诊断准确性:治疗研究,III 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Commonly Utilized Diagnostic Biopsy Techniques for Pediatric Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review by the APSA Cancer Committee.

Background: Historically, surgical biopsy (SB) for diagnosis of pediatric solid tumors was considered necessary to provide adequate tissue for histologic and molecular analysis. Less invasive biopsy techniques such as image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB), have shown comparable accuracy with decreased morbidity in some adult studies. However, data regarding the safety and efficacy of CNB in pediatric tumors is limited. This study's aim was to assess the overall rate of successful diagnosis and safety of CNB compared to SB in children with malignancies.

Methods: A PRISMA compliant systematic review was performed in MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase and CINAHL Plus database searches from 2010 to 2023. Studies were included with relevance to the following clinical question: For children with concern for malignancy requiring biopsy for diagnosis, how does CNB compare to open or laparoscopic/thoracoscopic SB in terms of safety and diagnostic efficacy? Data for patients ≤21 years requiring biopsy for diagnosis of liver tumors, neuroblastoma (NB), soft tissue sarcoma (STS), and lymphoma were included.

Results: Twenty-seven studies including 2477 patients met inclusion criteria, with 2065 undergoing CNB and 412 SB. Of the 2477 patients, 820 patients had NB, 307 liver tumors, 96 STS, 151 lymphoma, and 1103 patients were from studies that included multiple diagnoses. The average complication rate for CNB was 2.9% compared to 21.4% for SB (p < 0.001). Bleeding was the most common complication in both groups, but significantly higher after SB (22.1% vs 2.3%) (p < 0.001). CNB was diagnostic in 90.8% of patients compared to 98.8% who underwent SB (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Rates of successful diagnosis were greater than 90% for both CNB and SB, though significantly higher for SB. Conversely, complication rates were close to ten times higher after SB compared to CNB. Given its relatively lower risk profile, CNB can be a safe and useful diagnostic tool for children with solid malignancies. Research focused on enhancing CNB's diagnostic accuracy while maintaining low morbidity should be further explored.

Level of evidence: Treatment study, Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信