Martin Alavi Treider, Henrik Røkkum, Thorstein Sæter, Kristin Bjørnland
{"title":"\"先天性十二指肠梗阻修复术后的胃肠道生活质量:全国长期随访研究\"。","authors":"Martin Alavi Treider, Henrik Røkkum, Thorstein Sæter, Kristin Bjørnland","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO) is one of the most common gastrointestinal congenital anomalies. Still, patient-reported long-term results are limited. The aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term gastrointestinal quality of life (QoL), generic QoL, patient-reported scar appearance, and reinterventions after CDO repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent surgery for CDO in Norway from 1995 to 2020 were invited to answer the validated questionnaires PedsQL and PedsQL gastrointestinal symptom scale and a study-specific questionnaire on general health and scar assessment. Parent-proxy reports were used for patients <12 years and patients with cognitive impairment. Scores were compared with an American and Norwegian control group for gastrointestinal and generic QoL, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 186 eligible patients, eight were deceased, 25 had unretrievable contact information, and 79 did not respond. There were no significant differences between included (n = 74) and not included (n = 112) patients regarding baseline data. The mean follow-up time was 13.3 (SD = 6.6) years. Patients with CDO had significantly lower overall gastrointestinal QoL than controls (85.9 versus 90.0, p = 0.010). The most common symptoms were gas/bloating, constipation, food/drink limits, and reflux. Generic QoL was similar between the CDO population and controls (84.4 versus 85.3, p = 0.530). Twenty-one (28 %) patients had some degree of pain and/or concern related to the surgical scar. Nine (12 %) patients had reoperations related to the CDO repair; four due to adhesive small bowel obstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A notable portion of patients report troublesome gastrointestinal symptoms and cosmetic concerns regarding their surgical scar after CDO repair. Even so, generic QoL was good.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Gastrointestinal Quality of Life After Congenital Duodenal Obstruction Repair: A Nationwide Long-term Follow-up Study\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Martin Alavi Treider, Henrik Røkkum, Thorstein Sæter, Kristin Bjørnland\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO) is one of the most common gastrointestinal congenital anomalies. Still, patient-reported long-term results are limited. The aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term gastrointestinal quality of life (QoL), generic QoL, patient-reported scar appearance, and reinterventions after CDO repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent surgery for CDO in Norway from 1995 to 2020 were invited to answer the validated questionnaires PedsQL and PedsQL gastrointestinal symptom scale and a study-specific questionnaire on general health and scar assessment. Parent-proxy reports were used for patients <12 years and patients with cognitive impairment. Scores were compared with an American and Norwegian control group for gastrointestinal and generic QoL, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 186 eligible patients, eight were deceased, 25 had unretrievable contact information, and 79 did not respond. There were no significant differences between included (n = 74) and not included (n = 112) patients regarding baseline data. The mean follow-up time was 13.3 (SD = 6.6) years. Patients with CDO had significantly lower overall gastrointestinal QoL than controls (85.9 versus 90.0, p = 0.010). The most common symptoms were gas/bloating, constipation, food/drink limits, and reflux. Generic QoL was similar between the CDO population and controls (84.4 versus 85.3, p = 0.530). Twenty-one (28 %) patients had some degree of pain and/or concern related to the surgical scar. Nine (12 %) patients had reoperations related to the CDO repair; four due to adhesive small bowel obstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A notable portion of patients report troublesome gastrointestinal symptoms and cosmetic concerns regarding their surgical scar after CDO repair. Even so, generic QoL was good.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161938\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161938","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
"Gastrointestinal Quality of Life After Congenital Duodenal Obstruction Repair: A Nationwide Long-term Follow-up Study".
Background: Congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO) is one of the most common gastrointestinal congenital anomalies. Still, patient-reported long-term results are limited. The aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term gastrointestinal quality of life (QoL), generic QoL, patient-reported scar appearance, and reinterventions after CDO repair.
Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for CDO in Norway from 1995 to 2020 were invited to answer the validated questionnaires PedsQL and PedsQL gastrointestinal symptom scale and a study-specific questionnaire on general health and scar assessment. Parent-proxy reports were used for patients <12 years and patients with cognitive impairment. Scores were compared with an American and Norwegian control group for gastrointestinal and generic QoL, respectively.
Results: Of 186 eligible patients, eight were deceased, 25 had unretrievable contact information, and 79 did not respond. There were no significant differences between included (n = 74) and not included (n = 112) patients regarding baseline data. The mean follow-up time was 13.3 (SD = 6.6) years. Patients with CDO had significantly lower overall gastrointestinal QoL than controls (85.9 versus 90.0, p = 0.010). The most common symptoms were gas/bloating, constipation, food/drink limits, and reflux. Generic QoL was similar between the CDO population and controls (84.4 versus 85.3, p = 0.530). Twenty-one (28 %) patients had some degree of pain and/or concern related to the surgical scar. Nine (12 %) patients had reoperations related to the CDO repair; four due to adhesive small bowel obstruction.
Conclusion: A notable portion of patients report troublesome gastrointestinal symptoms and cosmetic concerns regarding their surgical scar after CDO repair. Even so, generic QoL was good.
期刊介绍:
The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.