在患有神经系统疾病的婴儿家庭会议中讨论精神问题。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dana Peralta MD , Nikhita Nanduri , Simran Bansal BS , Sharla Rent MD , Debra H. Brandon PhD , Kathryn I. Pollak PhD , Monica E. Lemmon MD
{"title":"在患有神经系统疾病的婴儿家庭会议中讨论精神问题。","authors":"Dana Peralta MD ,&nbsp;Nikhita Nanduri ,&nbsp;Simran Bansal BS ,&nbsp;Sharla Rent MD ,&nbsp;Debra H. Brandon PhD ,&nbsp;Kathryn I. Pollak PhD ,&nbsp;Monica E. Lemmon MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.09.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Spirituality serves as a mechanism to understand and cope with serious illness, yet little is known about how families and clinicians incorporate spirituality in pediatric family conferences.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We sought to characterize the frequency and nature of spiritual statements in conferences between families and clinicians caring for infants with neurologic conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this descriptive qualitative study, we used an existing dataset of audio-recorded, de-identified, transcribed family conferences of infants with neurologic conditions. Inclusion criteria for infants were 1) age &lt; 1 year, 2) presence of a neurologic condition, and 3) planned conversation about neurologic prognosis or goals of care. We used a content analysis approach to code the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>68 family conferences were held for 24 infants and 36 parents. Most parents (<em>n</em> = 32/36, 89%) self-identified as spiritual. References to spirituality occurred in the 32% of conferences (<em>n</em> = 22/68). Spiritual discussion included three domains: 1) <em>Spiritual beliefs and practices,</em> 2) <em>Spiritual support</em>, and 3) <em>Parent-child connection as sacred.</em> Clinicians’ responses to family member spiritual statements were inconsistent and included providing affirmation, exploring goals of care, and continuing discussion of clinical information.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Spirituality was discussed in approximately one-third of family conferences. Clinician engagement with spirituality discussion was variable. These findings highlight a need for training on when and how to discuss spirituality in conversations with families of seriously ill infants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"69 1","pages":"Pages 34-43.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discussion of Spirituality in Family Conferences of Infants With Neurologic Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Dana Peralta MD ,&nbsp;Nikhita Nanduri ,&nbsp;Simran Bansal BS ,&nbsp;Sharla Rent MD ,&nbsp;Debra H. Brandon PhD ,&nbsp;Kathryn I. Pollak PhD ,&nbsp;Monica E. Lemmon MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.09.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Spirituality serves as a mechanism to understand and cope with serious illness, yet little is known about how families and clinicians incorporate spirituality in pediatric family conferences.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We sought to characterize the frequency and nature of spiritual statements in conferences between families and clinicians caring for infants with neurologic conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this descriptive qualitative study, we used an existing dataset of audio-recorded, de-identified, transcribed family conferences of infants with neurologic conditions. Inclusion criteria for infants were 1) age &lt; 1 year, 2) presence of a neurologic condition, and 3) planned conversation about neurologic prognosis or goals of care. We used a content analysis approach to code the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>68 family conferences were held for 24 infants and 36 parents. Most parents (<em>n</em> = 32/36, 89%) self-identified as spiritual. References to spirituality occurred in the 32% of conferences (<em>n</em> = 22/68). Spiritual discussion included three domains: 1) <em>Spiritual beliefs and practices,</em> 2) <em>Spiritual support</em>, and 3) <em>Parent-child connection as sacred.</em> Clinicians’ responses to family member spiritual statements were inconsistent and included providing affirmation, exploring goals of care, and continuing discussion of clinical information.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Spirituality was discussed in approximately one-third of family conferences. Clinician engagement with spirituality discussion was variable. These findings highlight a need for training on when and how to discuss spirituality in conversations with families of seriously ill infants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 34-43.e1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088539242401039X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088539242401039X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:灵性是理解和应对重病的一种机制,但人们对家庭和临床医生如何在儿科家庭会议中融入灵性却知之甚少:灵性是理解和应对严重疾病的一种机制,但人们对家庭和临床医生如何在儿科家庭会议中融入灵性却知之甚少:目的:我们试图描述在护理患有神经系统疾病的婴儿的家庭和临床医生之间的会议中精神陈述的频率和性质:在这项描述性定性研究中,我们使用了一个现有的数据集,该数据集是对患有神经系统疾病的婴儿的家庭会议进行录音、去标识和转录的。婴儿的纳入标准为:1)年龄小于 1 岁;2)患有神经系统疾病;3)计划进行有关神经系统疾病预后或护理目标的谈话。我们采用内容分析法对数据进行编码:我们为 24 名婴儿和 36 名家长召开了 68 次家庭会议。大多数家长(n=32/36,89%)自我认同为有灵性。32%的会议(n=22/68)提到了灵性。灵性讨论包括 3 个方面:1)灵性信仰和实践;2)灵性支持;3)神圣的亲子关系。临床医生对家庭成员灵性陈述的回应并不一致,包括提供肯定、探讨护理目标以及继续讨论临床信息:结论:约三分之一的家庭会议讨论了灵性问题。临床医生参与灵性讨论的程度不一。这些发现突出表明,有必要就何时以及如何在与重症婴儿家属的对话中讨论灵性问题进行培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discussion of Spirituality in Family Conferences of Infants With Neurologic Conditions

Introduction

Spirituality serves as a mechanism to understand and cope with serious illness, yet little is known about how families and clinicians incorporate spirituality in pediatric family conferences.

Objectives

We sought to characterize the frequency and nature of spiritual statements in conferences between families and clinicians caring for infants with neurologic conditions.

Methods

In this descriptive qualitative study, we used an existing dataset of audio-recorded, de-identified, transcribed family conferences of infants with neurologic conditions. Inclusion criteria for infants were 1) age < 1 year, 2) presence of a neurologic condition, and 3) planned conversation about neurologic prognosis or goals of care. We used a content analysis approach to code the data.

Results

68 family conferences were held for 24 infants and 36 parents. Most parents (n = 32/36, 89%) self-identified as spiritual. References to spirituality occurred in the 32% of conferences (n = 22/68). Spiritual discussion included three domains: 1) Spiritual beliefs and practices, 2) Spiritual support, and 3) Parent-child connection as sacred. Clinicians’ responses to family member spiritual statements were inconsistent and included providing affirmation, exploring goals of care, and continuing discussion of clinical information.

Conclusions

Spirituality was discussed in approximately one-third of family conferences. Clinician engagement with spirituality discussion was variable. These findings highlight a need for training on when and how to discuss spirituality in conversations with families of seriously ill infants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信