{"title":"利用原子力显微镜地形图建立综合结构生物学管道的前景。","authors":"Jean-Luc Pellequer","doi":"10.1002/jmr.3102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>After the recent double revolutions in structural biology, which include the use of direct detectors for cryo-electron microscopy resulting in a significant improvement in the expected resolution of large macromolecule structures, and the advent of AlphaFold which allows for near-accurate prediction of any protein structures, the field of structural biology is now pursuing more ambitious targets, including several MDa assemblies. But complex target systems cannot be tackled using a single biophysical technique. The field of integrative structural biology has emerged as a global solution. The aim is to integrate data from multiple complementary techniques to produce a final three-dimensional model that cannot be obtained from any single technique. The absence of atomic force microscopy data from integrative structural biology platforms is not necessarily due to its nm resolution, as opposed to Å resolution for x-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance, or electron microscopy. Rather a significant issue was that the AFM topographic data lacked interpretability. Fortunately, with the introduction of the AFM-Assembly pipeline and other similar tools, it is now possible to integrate AFM topographic data into integrative modeling platforms. The advantages of single molecule techniques, such as AFM, include the ability to confirm experimentally any assembled molecular models or to produce alternative conformations that mimic the inherent flexibility of large proteins or complexes. The review begins with a brief overview of the historical developments of AFM data in structural biology, followed by an examination of the strengths and limitations of AFM imaging, which have hindered its integration into modern modeling platforms. This review discusses the correction and improvement of AFM topographic images, as well as the principles behind the AFM-Assembly pipeline. It also presents and discusses a series of challenges that need to be addressed in order to improve the incorporation of AFM data into integrative modeling platform.</p>","PeriodicalId":16531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Recognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmr.3102","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives Toward an Integrative Structural Biology Pipeline With Atomic Force Microscopy Topographic Images\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Luc Pellequer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmr.3102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>After the recent double revolutions in structural biology, which include the use of direct detectors for cryo-electron microscopy resulting in a significant improvement in the expected resolution of large macromolecule structures, and the advent of AlphaFold which allows for near-accurate prediction of any protein structures, the field of structural biology is now pursuing more ambitious targets, including several MDa assemblies. But complex target systems cannot be tackled using a single biophysical technique. The field of integrative structural biology has emerged as a global solution. The aim is to integrate data from multiple complementary techniques to produce a final three-dimensional model that cannot be obtained from any single technique. The absence of atomic force microscopy data from integrative structural biology platforms is not necessarily due to its nm resolution, as opposed to Å resolution for x-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance, or electron microscopy. Rather a significant issue was that the AFM topographic data lacked interpretability. Fortunately, with the introduction of the AFM-Assembly pipeline and other similar tools, it is now possible to integrate AFM topographic data into integrative modeling platforms. The advantages of single molecule techniques, such as AFM, include the ability to confirm experimentally any assembled molecular models or to produce alternative conformations that mimic the inherent flexibility of large proteins or complexes. The review begins with a brief overview of the historical developments of AFM data in structural biology, followed by an examination of the strengths and limitations of AFM imaging, which have hindered its integration into modern modeling platforms. This review discusses the correction and improvement of AFM topographic images, as well as the principles behind the AFM-Assembly pipeline. It also presents and discusses a series of challenges that need to be addressed in order to improve the incorporation of AFM data into integrative modeling platform.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Recognition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmr.3102\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Recognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmr.3102\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmr.3102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近,结构生物学领域发生了两场革命,一是在低温电子显微镜中使用了直接探测器,大大提高了大型大分子结构的预期分辨率,二是 AlphaFold 的出现使任何蛋白质结构的预测接近精确。但是,单一的生物物理技术无法解决复杂的目标系统。作为一种全球性解决方案,整合结构生物学领域应运而生。其目的是整合来自多种互补技术的数据,生成最终的三维模型,而这种模型是任何单一技术都无法获得的。综合结构生物学平台缺乏原子力显微镜数据并不一定是由于其纳米分辨率,而不是 X 射线晶体学、核磁共振或电子显微镜的埃分辨率。相反,一个重要的问题是原子力显微镜拓扑数据缺乏可解释性。幸运的是,随着 AFM-Assembly 管道和其他类似工具的推出,现在可以将 AFM 拓扑数据集成到集成建模平台中。单分子技术(如原子力显微镜)的优势包括能够通过实验确认任何组装好的分子模型,或产生模拟大型蛋白质或复合物固有灵活性的替代构象。本综述首先简要概述了原子力显微镜数据在结构生物学中的历史发展,然后探讨了原子力显微镜成像的优势和局限性,这些优势和局限性阻碍了原子力显微镜成像与现代建模平台的整合。本综述讨论了原子力显微镜地形图像的校正和改进,以及原子力显微镜-组装管道背后的原理。它还提出并讨论了一系列需要应对的挑战,以便更好地将原子力显微镜数据纳入集成建模平台。
Perspectives Toward an Integrative Structural Biology Pipeline With Atomic Force Microscopy Topographic Images
After the recent double revolutions in structural biology, which include the use of direct detectors for cryo-electron microscopy resulting in a significant improvement in the expected resolution of large macromolecule structures, and the advent of AlphaFold which allows for near-accurate prediction of any protein structures, the field of structural biology is now pursuing more ambitious targets, including several MDa assemblies. But complex target systems cannot be tackled using a single biophysical technique. The field of integrative structural biology has emerged as a global solution. The aim is to integrate data from multiple complementary techniques to produce a final three-dimensional model that cannot be obtained from any single technique. The absence of atomic force microscopy data from integrative structural biology platforms is not necessarily due to its nm resolution, as opposed to Å resolution for x-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance, or electron microscopy. Rather a significant issue was that the AFM topographic data lacked interpretability. Fortunately, with the introduction of the AFM-Assembly pipeline and other similar tools, it is now possible to integrate AFM topographic data into integrative modeling platforms. The advantages of single molecule techniques, such as AFM, include the ability to confirm experimentally any assembled molecular models or to produce alternative conformations that mimic the inherent flexibility of large proteins or complexes. The review begins with a brief overview of the historical developments of AFM data in structural biology, followed by an examination of the strengths and limitations of AFM imaging, which have hindered its integration into modern modeling platforms. This review discusses the correction and improvement of AFM topographic images, as well as the principles behind the AFM-Assembly pipeline. It also presents and discusses a series of challenges that need to be addressed in order to improve the incorporation of AFM data into integrative modeling platform.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Molecular Recognition (JMR) publishes original research papers and reviews describing substantial advances in our understanding of molecular recognition phenomena in life sciences, covering all aspects from biochemistry, molecular biology, medicine, and biophysics. The research may employ experimental, theoretical and/or computational approaches.
The focus of the journal is on recognition phenomena involving biomolecules and their biological / biochemical partners rather than on the recognition of metal ions or inorganic compounds. Molecular recognition involves non-covalent specific interactions between two or more biological molecules, molecular aggregates, cellular modules or organelles, as exemplified by receptor-ligand, antigen-antibody, nucleic acid-protein, sugar-lectin, to mention just a few of the possible interactions. The journal invites manuscripts that aim to achieve a complete description of molecular recognition mechanisms between well-characterized biomolecules in terms of structure, dynamics and biological activity. Such studies may help the future development of new drugs and vaccines, although the experimental testing of new drugs and vaccines falls outside the scope of the journal. Manuscripts that describe the application of standard approaches and techniques to design or model new molecular entities or to describe interactions between biomolecules, but do not provide new insights into molecular recognition processes will not be considered. Similarly, manuscripts involving biomolecules uncharacterized at the sequence level (e.g. calf thymus DNA) will not be considered.