未破裂颅内动脉瘤从保守治疗到介入治疗。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Benedikt Bandhauer, Philipp Gruber, Lukas Andereggen, Jatta Berberat, Stefan Wanderer, Marco Cattaneo, Gerrit A Schubert, Luca Remonda, Serge Marbacher, Basil E Grüter
{"title":"未破裂颅内动脉瘤从保守治疗到介入治疗。","authors":"Benedikt Bandhauer, Philipp Gruber, Lukas Andereggen, Jatta Berberat, Stefan Wanderer, Marco Cattaneo, Gerrit A Schubert, Luca Remonda, Serge Marbacher, Basil E Grüter","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.JNS24568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Indication for treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is based on several factors, such as patient age, previous medical history, and UIA location and size. For patients harboring UIAs initially managed noninvasively, the treatment strategy during follow-up (FU) can be changed to include surgical or endovascular intervention. This study aims to identify characteristic patterns and potential predictors of UIAs that require revision of the initial management strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors identified intracranial aneurysm (IA) cases newly diagnosed between 2006 and 2022 and initially assigned conservative management. These cases were retrospectively reviewed for 1) patient and UIA characteristics at the time of diagnosis (patient age, comorbidities, previous medical history, potential risk factors, as well as UIA angioarchitecture, location, and size), and 2) any changes in treatment strategy (reason for change, time until intervention, modality of intervention).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1041 IA cases diagnosed in the study period, 144 were initially assigned conservative management. In 10 (6.9%) of these 144 cases, the treatment indication was modified to microsurgical clipping (n = 6) or endovascular embolization (n = 4) after a median FU of 26 months (IQR 8.5-64.5 months). In these 10 cases, the indication for intervention was attributable to IA growth (n = 7), a change in IA configuration (n = 2), or both (n = 1). Exploratory analyses of the effects of UIA size on diagnosis in terms of the hazard for a change of decision suggested an effect starting from 3 mm. No conservatively managed UIAs (n = 144) ruptured during the study period (median FU 24.5 months, IQR 7.75-55.75 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The likelihood of a shift to invasive UIA treatment is relatively low if a conservative therapeutic strategy was initially established. However, for cases with changes to the treatment strategy, the change is most often attributable to UIA growth over time. UIAs measuring < 3 mm at initial diagnosis are less likely to be later treated interventionally than those > 3 mm at diagnosis. Therefore, conservatively managed patients with UIAs should be closely monitored with regular radiographic FUs, particularly if the UIA measured > 3 mm at the time of diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From conservative to interventional management in unruptured intracranial aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"Benedikt Bandhauer, Philipp Gruber, Lukas Andereggen, Jatta Berberat, Stefan Wanderer, Marco Cattaneo, Gerrit A Schubert, Luca Remonda, Serge Marbacher, Basil E Grüter\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.6.JNS24568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Indication for treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is based on several factors, such as patient age, previous medical history, and UIA location and size. For patients harboring UIAs initially managed noninvasively, the treatment strategy during follow-up (FU) can be changed to include surgical or endovascular intervention. This study aims to identify characteristic patterns and potential predictors of UIAs that require revision of the initial management strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors identified intracranial aneurysm (IA) cases newly diagnosed between 2006 and 2022 and initially assigned conservative management. These cases were retrospectively reviewed for 1) patient and UIA characteristics at the time of diagnosis (patient age, comorbidities, previous medical history, potential risk factors, as well as UIA angioarchitecture, location, and size), and 2) any changes in treatment strategy (reason for change, time until intervention, modality of intervention).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1041 IA cases diagnosed in the study period, 144 were initially assigned conservative management. In 10 (6.9%) of these 144 cases, the treatment indication was modified to microsurgical clipping (n = 6) or endovascular embolization (n = 4) after a median FU of 26 months (IQR 8.5-64.5 months). In these 10 cases, the indication for intervention was attributable to IA growth (n = 7), a change in IA configuration (n = 2), or both (n = 1). Exploratory analyses of the effects of UIA size on diagnosis in terms of the hazard for a change of decision suggested an effect starting from 3 mm. No conservatively managed UIAs (n = 144) ruptured during the study period (median FU 24.5 months, IQR 7.75-55.75 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The likelihood of a shift to invasive UIA treatment is relatively low if a conservative therapeutic strategy was initially established. However, for cases with changes to the treatment strategy, the change is most often attributable to UIA growth over time. UIAs measuring < 3 mm at initial diagnosis are less likely to be later treated interventionally than those > 3 mm at diagnosis. Therefore, conservatively managed patients with UIAs should be closely monitored with regular radiographic FUs, particularly if the UIA measured > 3 mm at the time of diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.JNS24568\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.JNS24568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIAs)的治疗指征取决于多种因素,如患者年龄、既往病史、UIAs 位置和大小等。对于最初采用无创治疗的 UIA 患者,随访期间(FU)的治疗策略可改变为手术或血管内介入治疗。本研究旨在确定需要修改初始治疗策略的 UIA 的特征模式和潜在预测因素:作者确定了 2006 年至 2022 年间新诊断的颅内动脉瘤(IA)病例,这些病例最初被指定为保守治疗。作者对这些病例进行了回顾性分析:1)诊断时患者和 UIA 的特征(患者年龄、合并症、既往病史、潜在风险因素以及 UIA 的血管结构、位置和大小);2)治疗策略的任何改变(改变的原因、干预前的时间、干预方式):在研究期间确诊的 1041 例内科病例中,有 144 例最初采用保守治疗。在这 144 例病例中,有 10 例(6.9%)的治疗指征在中位 26 个月(IQR 8.5-64.5 个月)后变更为显微外科剪切术(6 例)或血管内栓塞术(4 例)。在这 10 个病例中,干预指征可归因于内膜腔增生(7 例)、内膜腔结构改变(2 例)或两者兼而有之(1 例)。根据改变诊断决定的风险对 UIA 大小对诊断的影响进行的探索性分析表明,从 3 mm 开始就有影响。在研究期间(中位数FU为24.5个月,IQR为7.75-55.75个月),没有保守治疗的UIA(n = 144)破裂:结论:如果最初确定的是保守治疗策略,那么转向侵入性 UIA 治疗的可能性相对较低。结论:如果最初确定的是保守治疗策略,那么转变为侵入性 UIA 治疗的可能性相对较低。然而,对于改变治疗策略的病例,改变的原因多半是 UIA 随着时间的推移而增长。与诊断时直径大于 3 毫米的 UIA 相比,最初诊断时直径小于 3 毫米的 UIA 以后接受介入治疗的可能性较小。因此,保守治疗的 UIA 患者应通过定期的影像学 FU 检查进行密切监测,尤其是在诊断时 UIA > 3 mm 的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From conservative to interventional management in unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Objective: Indication for treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is based on several factors, such as patient age, previous medical history, and UIA location and size. For patients harboring UIAs initially managed noninvasively, the treatment strategy during follow-up (FU) can be changed to include surgical or endovascular intervention. This study aims to identify characteristic patterns and potential predictors of UIAs that require revision of the initial management strategy.

Methods: The authors identified intracranial aneurysm (IA) cases newly diagnosed between 2006 and 2022 and initially assigned conservative management. These cases were retrospectively reviewed for 1) patient and UIA characteristics at the time of diagnosis (patient age, comorbidities, previous medical history, potential risk factors, as well as UIA angioarchitecture, location, and size), and 2) any changes in treatment strategy (reason for change, time until intervention, modality of intervention).

Results: Among 1041 IA cases diagnosed in the study period, 144 were initially assigned conservative management. In 10 (6.9%) of these 144 cases, the treatment indication was modified to microsurgical clipping (n = 6) or endovascular embolization (n = 4) after a median FU of 26 months (IQR 8.5-64.5 months). In these 10 cases, the indication for intervention was attributable to IA growth (n = 7), a change in IA configuration (n = 2), or both (n = 1). Exploratory analyses of the effects of UIA size on diagnosis in terms of the hazard for a change of decision suggested an effect starting from 3 mm. No conservatively managed UIAs (n = 144) ruptured during the study period (median FU 24.5 months, IQR 7.75-55.75 months).

Conclusions: The likelihood of a shift to invasive UIA treatment is relatively low if a conservative therapeutic strategy was initially established. However, for cases with changes to the treatment strategy, the change is most often attributable to UIA growth over time. UIAs measuring < 3 mm at initial diagnosis are less likely to be later treated interventionally than those > 3 mm at diagnosis. Therefore, conservatively managed patients with UIAs should be closely monitored with regular radiographic FUs, particularly if the UIA measured > 3 mm at the time of diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信