脓毒症和肌钙蛋白升高 (SET) 研究的一项探索性分析:开发反映心功能障碍的扩展心血管 SOFA 评分组件,改善脓毒症患者的生存预测:脓毒症和肌钙蛋白升高 (SET) 研究的探索性分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
S Lörstad, Y Wang, S Tehrani, S Shekarestan, P Åstrand, P Gille-Johnson, T Jernberg, J Persson
{"title":"脓毒症和肌钙蛋白升高 (SET) 研究的一项探索性分析:开发反映心功能障碍的扩展心血管 SOFA 评分组件,改善脓毒症患者的生存预测:脓毒症和肌钙蛋白升高 (SET) 研究的探索性分析。","authors":"S Lörstad, Y Wang, S Tehrani, S Shekarestan, P Åstrand, P Gille-Johnson, T Jernberg, J Persson","doi":"10.1177/08850666241282294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The cardiovascular component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score does not correspond with contemporary clinical practice in sepsis or identify impaired cardiac function. Our aim was to develop a modified cardiovascular SOFA component that reflects cardiac dysfunction and improves the SOFA score's 30-day mortality discrimination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of sepsis patients from a previous study was divided into a training (n = 250) and test cohort (n = 253). Nine widely available measures of cardiovascular function were screened for association with 30-day mortality using natural cubic spline. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and heart rate (HR) were transformed into ordinal variables (0-4 points). The presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) was assigned two points. The SOFA score was extended by adding the variable points in different weights and combinations. The best-performing cardiac-extended model (CE-SOFA) was evaluated in the test cohort. Improved prognostic discrimination and calibration were assessed using logistic regression, area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) index, and DeLong and Hoshmer-Lemeshow tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the training cohort, all differently weighted and combined models using hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP and AF points added to the SOFA score showed improved discriminative ability (AUC 0.67-0.75) compared to the SOFA score (AUC 0.62; NRI <i>P </i>< .001; DeLong <i>P ≤ </i>.001). In the test cohort, CE-SOFA demonstrated improved 30-day mortality discrimination compared to the SOFA score (AUC 0.72 vs 0.68), exhibiting good calibration and significantly improved discrimination using the NRI index (<i>P </i>= .009) but not the DeLong test (<i>P </i>= .142).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CE-SOFA model reflects cardiac dysfunction and improves 30-day mortality discrimination in sepsis. External validation is the next step to further substantiate a revised cardiovascular component in a future SOFA 2.0.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of an Extended Cardiovascular SOFA Score Component Reflecting Cardiac Dysfunction with Improved Survival Prediction in Sepsis: An Exploratory Analysis in the Sepsis and Elevated Troponin (SET) Study.\",\"authors\":\"S Lörstad, Y Wang, S Tehrani, S Shekarestan, P Åstrand, P Gille-Johnson, T Jernberg, J Persson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08850666241282294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The cardiovascular component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score does not correspond with contemporary clinical practice in sepsis or identify impaired cardiac function. Our aim was to develop a modified cardiovascular SOFA component that reflects cardiac dysfunction and improves the SOFA score's 30-day mortality discrimination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of sepsis patients from a previous study was divided into a training (n = 250) and test cohort (n = 253). Nine widely available measures of cardiovascular function were screened for association with 30-day mortality using natural cubic spline. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and heart rate (HR) were transformed into ordinal variables (0-4 points). The presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) was assigned two points. The SOFA score was extended by adding the variable points in different weights and combinations. The best-performing cardiac-extended model (CE-SOFA) was evaluated in the test cohort. Improved prognostic discrimination and calibration were assessed using logistic regression, area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) index, and DeLong and Hoshmer-Lemeshow tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the training cohort, all differently weighted and combined models using hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP and AF points added to the SOFA score showed improved discriminative ability (AUC 0.67-0.75) compared to the SOFA score (AUC 0.62; NRI <i>P </i>< .001; DeLong <i>P ≤ </i>.001). In the test cohort, CE-SOFA demonstrated improved 30-day mortality discrimination compared to the SOFA score (AUC 0.72 vs 0.68), exhibiting good calibration and significantly improved discrimination using the NRI index (<i>P </i>= .009) but not the DeLong test (<i>P </i>= .142).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CE-SOFA model reflects cardiac dysfunction and improves 30-day mortality discrimination in sepsis. External validation is the next step to further substantiate a revised cardiovascular component in a future SOFA 2.0.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241282294\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241282294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分中的心血管部分不符合脓毒症的现代临床实践,也不能识别受损的心脏功能。我们的目的是开发一种改进的心血管 SOFA 成分,以反映心脏功能障碍并提高 SOFA 评分对 30 天死亡率的判别能力:方法:将先前研究中的败血症患者分为训练组(250 人)和测试组(253 人)。采用自然三次样条法筛选了九种广泛使用的心血管功能测量指标与 30 天死亡率的关联性。高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T(hs-cTnT)、N-末端前 B 型钠尿肽(NT-proBNP)和心率(HR)被转化为序数变量(0-4 点)。是否存在心房颤动(AF)则得 2 分。以不同的权重和组合添加变量点,从而扩展 SOFA 评分。在测试队列中评估了表现最佳的心脏扩展模型(CE-SOFA)。使用逻辑回归、接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、净重新分类改进(NRI)指数以及 DeLong 和 Hoshmer-Lemeshow 检验评估了预后判别和校准的改进情况:在训练队列中,与 SOFA 评分(AUC 0.62;NRI P P ≤ .001)相比,所有使用 hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP 和 AF 积分加入 SOFA 评分的不同加权模型和组合模型都显示出更好的判别能力(AUC 0.67-0.75)。在测试队列中,与 SOFA 评分相比,CE-SOFA 显示出更好的 30 天死亡率判别能力(AUC 0.72 vs 0.68),表现出良好的校准性,使用 NRI 指数(P = .009)而非 DeLong 检验(P = .142)可显著提高判别能力:结论:CE-SOFA 模型能反映脓毒症患者的心脏功能障碍并提高 30 天死亡率的判别能力。下一步将进行外部验证,以进一步证实未来 SOFA 2.0 中修订的心血管部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of an Extended Cardiovascular SOFA Score Component Reflecting Cardiac Dysfunction with Improved Survival Prediction in Sepsis: An Exploratory Analysis in the Sepsis and Elevated Troponin (SET) Study.

Introduction: The cardiovascular component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score does not correspond with contemporary clinical practice in sepsis or identify impaired cardiac function. Our aim was to develop a modified cardiovascular SOFA component that reflects cardiac dysfunction and improves the SOFA score's 30-day mortality discrimination.

Methods: A cohort of sepsis patients from a previous study was divided into a training (n = 250) and test cohort (n = 253). Nine widely available measures of cardiovascular function were screened for association with 30-day mortality using natural cubic spline. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and heart rate (HR) were transformed into ordinal variables (0-4 points). The presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) was assigned two points. The SOFA score was extended by adding the variable points in different weights and combinations. The best-performing cardiac-extended model (CE-SOFA) was evaluated in the test cohort. Improved prognostic discrimination and calibration were assessed using logistic regression, area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) index, and DeLong and Hoshmer-Lemeshow tests.

Results: In the training cohort, all differently weighted and combined models using hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP and AF points added to the SOFA score showed improved discriminative ability (AUC 0.67-0.75) compared to the SOFA score (AUC 0.62; NRI P < .001; DeLong P ≤ .001). In the test cohort, CE-SOFA demonstrated improved 30-day mortality discrimination compared to the SOFA score (AUC 0.72 vs 0.68), exhibiting good calibration and significantly improved discrimination using the NRI index (P = .009) but not the DeLong test (P = .142).

Conclusions: The CE-SOFA model reflects cardiac dysfunction and improves 30-day mortality discrimination in sepsis. External validation is the next step to further substantiate a revised cardiovascular component in a future SOFA 2.0.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信