混乱时期专业知识的部署:对康复临床医生的现象学研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Annie Rochette, Perrine Vermeulen, Joseph Omer Dyer, Marie-Christine Hallé, Marjorie Gingras, Anne Mingant, Manon Parisien, Aliki Thomas
{"title":"混乱时期专业知识的部署:对康复临床医生的现象学研究。","authors":"Annie Rochette, Perrine Vermeulen, Joseph Omer Dyer, Marie-Christine Hallé, Marjorie Gingras, Anne Mingant, Manon Parisien, Aliki Thomas","doi":"10.1111/jep.14150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Practice context is known to influence the deployment of competencies. The COVID-19 pandemic created a major disruption in many practice contexts. The objective was to understand the lived experience of rehabilitation clinicians during a major disruption of their practice context, namely, the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a longitudinal phenomenological design. Eligible clinicians were occupational therapists (OT), physical therapists (PT), physiotherapy technologists (Phys T.), speech-language pathologists (S-LP) and audiologists (AUD), working in the same rehabilitation workplace for at least 2 years before March 2020 (the pandemic). Clinicians who were reassigned to roles outside the field of rehabilitation were excluded. We conducted individual online interviews using a guide developed by the team with expertise and knowledge of the phenomenon. An interpretative phenomenological analysis was carried out. Results were discussed until the research team reached a consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 clinicians participated in the study (12 OT, 5 PT, 5 Phys T., 7 S-LP, 3 AUD), working with a variety of clienteles and work settings, for an average of 11.7 ± 7.6 years in the same practice setting. A wide range of emotions (e.g. anger, sadness, guilt, fear, pride) reflected clinicians' experience during disruption. Professional expertise was perceived as being enhanced by disruption as clinicians stepped out of their comfort zone; this encouraged reflective practice and a recognition of the need to be more explicit about their decision-making process. Collaboration with colleagues was perceived as key for effective coping and deployment of adaptative expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A disruption in the practice context may have positive effects on professional expertise through the mobilization of reflective practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deployment of professional expertise during a period of disruption: A phenomenological study of rehabilitation clinicians.\",\"authors\":\"Annie Rochette, Perrine Vermeulen, Joseph Omer Dyer, Marie-Christine Hallé, Marjorie Gingras, Anne Mingant, Manon Parisien, Aliki Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.14150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Practice context is known to influence the deployment of competencies. The COVID-19 pandemic created a major disruption in many practice contexts. The objective was to understand the lived experience of rehabilitation clinicians during a major disruption of their practice context, namely, the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a longitudinal phenomenological design. Eligible clinicians were occupational therapists (OT), physical therapists (PT), physiotherapy technologists (Phys T.), speech-language pathologists (S-LP) and audiologists (AUD), working in the same rehabilitation workplace for at least 2 years before March 2020 (the pandemic). Clinicians who were reassigned to roles outside the field of rehabilitation were excluded. We conducted individual online interviews using a guide developed by the team with expertise and knowledge of the phenomenon. An interpretative phenomenological analysis was carried out. Results were discussed until the research team reached a consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 clinicians participated in the study (12 OT, 5 PT, 5 Phys T., 7 S-LP, 3 AUD), working with a variety of clienteles and work settings, for an average of 11.7 ± 7.6 years in the same practice setting. A wide range of emotions (e.g. anger, sadness, guilt, fear, pride) reflected clinicians' experience during disruption. Professional expertise was perceived as being enhanced by disruption as clinicians stepped out of their comfort zone; this encouraged reflective practice and a recognition of the need to be more explicit about their decision-making process. Collaboration with colleagues was perceived as key for effective coping and deployment of adaptative expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A disruption in the practice context may have positive effects on professional expertise through the mobilization of reflective practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14150\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:众所周知,实践环境会影响能力的部署。COVID-19 大流行对许多实践环境造成了严重破坏。我们的目标是了解康复临床医生在 COVID-19 大流行对其工作环境造成重大破坏时的生活经历:我们采用了纵向现象学设计。符合条件的临床医生包括职业治疗师 (OT)、物理治疗师 (PT)、物理治疗技师 (PhysT.)、言语病理学家 (S-LP) 和听力学家 (AUD),他们在 2020 年 3 月(大流行)之前在同一康复工作场所工作至少两年。被重新分配到康复领域以外工作的临床医生不包括在内。我们使用由具有相关专业知识和知识的团队制定的指南进行了个人在线访谈。我们进行了解释现象学分析。我们对结果进行了讨论,直到研究小组达成共识:共有 32 名临床医生参与了研究(12 名康复治疗师、5 名康复理疗师、5 名物理治疗师、7 名 S-LP、3 名 AUD),他们在同一执业环境中工作了 11.7 ± 7.6 年,服务对象和工作环境各不相同。各种情绪(如愤怒、悲伤、内疚、恐惧、自豪)反映了临床医生在中断期间的经历。由于临床医生走出了自己的舒适区,他们认为专业技能在中断过程中得到了提升;这鼓励了他们进行反思性实践,并认识到有必要更加明确自己的决策过程。与同事的合作被认为是有效应对和运用适应性专业知识的关键:实践环境的破坏可能会通过调动反思性实践对专业知识产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deployment of professional expertise during a period of disruption: A phenomenological study of rehabilitation clinicians.

Rationale: Practice context is known to influence the deployment of competencies. The COVID-19 pandemic created a major disruption in many practice contexts. The objective was to understand the lived experience of rehabilitation clinicians during a major disruption of their practice context, namely, the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We used a longitudinal phenomenological design. Eligible clinicians were occupational therapists (OT), physical therapists (PT), physiotherapy technologists (Phys T.), speech-language pathologists (S-LP) and audiologists (AUD), working in the same rehabilitation workplace for at least 2 years before March 2020 (the pandemic). Clinicians who were reassigned to roles outside the field of rehabilitation were excluded. We conducted individual online interviews using a guide developed by the team with expertise and knowledge of the phenomenon. An interpretative phenomenological analysis was carried out. Results were discussed until the research team reached a consensus.

Results: A total of 32 clinicians participated in the study (12 OT, 5 PT, 5 Phys T., 7 S-LP, 3 AUD), working with a variety of clienteles and work settings, for an average of 11.7 ± 7.6 years in the same practice setting. A wide range of emotions (e.g. anger, sadness, guilt, fear, pride) reflected clinicians' experience during disruption. Professional expertise was perceived as being enhanced by disruption as clinicians stepped out of their comfort zone; this encouraged reflective practice and a recognition of the need to be more explicit about their decision-making process. Collaboration with colleagues was perceived as key for effective coping and deployment of adaptative expertise.

Conclusions: A disruption in the practice context may have positive effects on professional expertise through the mobilization of reflective practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信