综合护理和跨境工作的国际研究重点:电子德尔菲研究。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jason Scott, Justin Waring, Aaron Asibi Abuosi, Yakubu Adole Agada-Amade, Jibril Muhammad Bashar, Aoife De Brún, Henry Cann, Philip Crowley, Lindsay H Dewa, Samantha Spanos, Siri Wiig
{"title":"综合护理和跨境工作的国际研究重点:电子德尔菲研究。","authors":"Jason Scott, Justin Waring, Aaron Asibi Abuosi, Yakubu Adole Agada-Amade, Jibril Muhammad Bashar, Aoife De Brún, Henry Cann, Philip Crowley, Lindsay H Dewa, Samantha Spanos, Siri Wiig","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzae095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated care can be broadly defined as the delivery of high-quality and safe care for patients as they cross organisational boundaries or when care is delivered with multiple healthcare teams, professions or organisations. Successful integration of care services is contingent on multiple and complex factors across macro-, meso- and micro-levels of health and social care systems in lower-, middle- and higher-income countries. Previous priorities for the future development of integrated care have focused on designing and implementing models or approaches to integrated care rather than establishing the research needed to underpin them. This study aimed to address this evidence gap by developing a consensus on international research priorities related to integration of care and cross-boundary working.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a sequential electronic Delphi (eDelphi) study from September 2023 to December 2023. The eDelphi process consisted of initial priority generation followed by two rounds of consensus development via an online survey. Sixty-six priorities were generated by 19 delegates at an international conference workshop titled, \"Priority setting for future research on integration of care and cross-boundary working.\" Workshop delegates then identified other experts in integrated care and cross-boundary working from their networks. In each eDelphi round, participants then provided item-by-item responses using a seven-point Likert scale, with consensus defined a priori as ≥80% agreement (strongly agree or agree). Priorities that reached consensus were conceptually grouped into topics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five of 66 unique (37.9%) research priorities achieved consensus after two eDelphi rounds. In Round 1, 63/85 (74.1%) experts from ten countries across four continents achieved consensus on 12/66 (18.2%) priorities. In Round 2, 51/63 (81.0%) experts achieved consensus on a further 13/54 (24.1%) priorities. From the 25 priorities, we derived six conceptual groupings that represent broad topics for future research on integrated care and cross-boundary working: (1) access to care, (2) data sharing and technology, (3) measurement of care quality, (4) patient experience and satisfaction, (5) service design, integration and governance, and (6) teamwork and leadership.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating care services and improving cross-boundary working is important for improving the quality of care provided to patients regardless of country, therefore the conceptual topics and individual priorities identified in this study can inform policy makers, practitioners, and researchers when designing or evaluating integrated care services across the world in the pursuit of improved integrated care systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International research priorities for integrated care and cross-boundary working: an electronic Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Jason Scott, Justin Waring, Aaron Asibi Abuosi, Yakubu Adole Agada-Amade, Jibril Muhammad Bashar, Aoife De Brún, Henry Cann, Philip Crowley, Lindsay H Dewa, Samantha Spanos, Siri Wiig\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/intqhc/mzae095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated care can be broadly defined as the delivery of high-quality and safe care for patients as they cross organisational boundaries or when care is delivered with multiple healthcare teams, professions or organisations. Successful integration of care services is contingent on multiple and complex factors across macro-, meso- and micro-levels of health and social care systems in lower-, middle- and higher-income countries. Previous priorities for the future development of integrated care have focused on designing and implementing models or approaches to integrated care rather than establishing the research needed to underpin them. This study aimed to address this evidence gap by developing a consensus on international research priorities related to integration of care and cross-boundary working.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a sequential electronic Delphi (eDelphi) study from September 2023 to December 2023. The eDelphi process consisted of initial priority generation followed by two rounds of consensus development via an online survey. Sixty-six priorities were generated by 19 delegates at an international conference workshop titled, \\\"Priority setting for future research on integration of care and cross-boundary working.\\\" Workshop delegates then identified other experts in integrated care and cross-boundary working from their networks. In each eDelphi round, participants then provided item-by-item responses using a seven-point Likert scale, with consensus defined a priori as ≥80% agreement (strongly agree or agree). Priorities that reached consensus were conceptually grouped into topics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five of 66 unique (37.9%) research priorities achieved consensus after two eDelphi rounds. In Round 1, 63/85 (74.1%) experts from ten countries across four continents achieved consensus on 12/66 (18.2%) priorities. In Round 2, 51/63 (81.0%) experts achieved consensus on a further 13/54 (24.1%) priorities. From the 25 priorities, we derived six conceptual groupings that represent broad topics for future research on integrated care and cross-boundary working: (1) access to care, (2) data sharing and technology, (3) measurement of care quality, (4) patient experience and satisfaction, (5) service design, integration and governance, and (6) teamwork and leadership.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating care services and improving cross-boundary working is important for improving the quality of care provided to patients regardless of country, therefore the conceptual topics and individual priorities identified in this study can inform policy makers, practitioners, and researchers when designing or evaluating integrated care services across the world in the pursuit of improved integrated care systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Quality in Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Quality in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzae095\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzae095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:广义上讲,整合护理是指在病人跨越组织边界或由多个医疗团队、专业或组织提供护理服务时,为他们提供高质量和安全的护理服务。成功整合护理服务取决于低收入、中等收入和高收入国家医疗和社会护理系统宏观、中观和微观层面的多种复杂因素。综合护理未来发展的优先事项主要集中在设计和实施综合护理的模式或方法上,而不是建立支持这些模式或方法所需的研究。本研究旨在通过就与整合护理和跨境工作相关的国际研究重点达成共识来弥补这一证据缺口:我们在 2023 年 9 月至 2023 年 12 月期间开展了一项有序的电子德尔菲(eDelphi)研究。eDelphi 流程包括初步生成优先事项,然后通过在线调查达成两轮共识。在题为 "确定未来整合护理和跨境工作研究的优先事项 "的国际会议研讨会上,19 位代表提出了 66 个优先事项。研讨会代表随后从他们的网络中确定了整合护理和跨界工作方面的其他专家。在每一轮 eDelphi 讨论中,与会者采用李克特七分量表逐项作答,达成共识的先验定义是同意率≥80%(非常同意或同意)。达成共识的优先事项在概念上被归类为主题:在 66 个独特的研究重点中,有 25 个(37.9%)在两轮 eDelphi 之后达成了共识。在第一轮中,来自四大洲十个国家的 63/85 (74.1%)名专家就 12/66 (18.2%)个优先事项达成了共识。在第二轮中,51/63(81.0%)位专家就另外 13/54(24.1%)个优先事项达成了共识。从这 25 个优先事项中,我们得出了六个概念性分组,代表了未来整合护理和跨境工作研究的广泛主题:(1) 获得护理,(2) 数据共享和技术,(3) 护理质量的衡量,(4) 患者体验和满意度,(5) 服务设计、整合和治理,以及 (6) 团队合作和领导力:无论在哪个国家,整合护理服务和改善跨境工作对于提高为患者提供的护理质量都非常重要,因此,本研究中确定的概念性主题和个别优先事项可以为政策制定者、从业人员和研究人员在设计或评估世界各地的整合护理服务时提供参考,从而改善整合护理系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International research priorities for integrated care and cross-boundary working: an electronic Delphi study.

Background: Integrated care can be broadly defined as the delivery of high-quality and safe care for patients as they cross organisational boundaries or when care is delivered with multiple healthcare teams, professions or organisations. Successful integration of care services is contingent on multiple and complex factors across macro-, meso- and micro-levels of health and social care systems in lower-, middle- and higher-income countries. Previous priorities for the future development of integrated care have focused on designing and implementing models or approaches to integrated care rather than establishing the research needed to underpin them. This study aimed to address this evidence gap by developing a consensus on international research priorities related to integration of care and cross-boundary working.

Methods: We conducted a sequential electronic Delphi (eDelphi) study from September 2023 to December 2023. The eDelphi process consisted of initial priority generation followed by two rounds of consensus development via an online survey. Sixty-six priorities were generated by 19 delegates at an international conference workshop titled, "Priority setting for future research on integration of care and cross-boundary working." Workshop delegates then identified other experts in integrated care and cross-boundary working from their networks. In each eDelphi round, participants then provided item-by-item responses using a seven-point Likert scale, with consensus defined a priori as ≥80% agreement (strongly agree or agree). Priorities that reached consensus were conceptually grouped into topics.

Results: Twenty-five of 66 unique (37.9%) research priorities achieved consensus after two eDelphi rounds. In Round 1, 63/85 (74.1%) experts from ten countries across four continents achieved consensus on 12/66 (18.2%) priorities. In Round 2, 51/63 (81.0%) experts achieved consensus on a further 13/54 (24.1%) priorities. From the 25 priorities, we derived six conceptual groupings that represent broad topics for future research on integrated care and cross-boundary working: (1) access to care, (2) data sharing and technology, (3) measurement of care quality, (4) patient experience and satisfaction, (5) service design, integration and governance, and (6) teamwork and leadership.

Conclusion: Integrating care services and improving cross-boundary working is important for improving the quality of care provided to patients regardless of country, therefore the conceptual topics and individual priorities identified in this study can inform policy makers, practitioners, and researchers when designing or evaluating integrated care services across the world in the pursuit of improved integrated care systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信