对有不可逆牙髓炎症状的牙齿进行牙髓切断术和根管治疗的术后短期疼痛及其对生活质量的影响:随机对照临床试验。

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Neha Patel, Iftekhar Khan, Fadi Jarad, Angelo Zavattini, Garrit Koller, Tiago Pimentel, Kazim Mahmood, Francesco Mannocci
{"title":"对有不可逆牙髓炎症状的牙齿进行牙髓切断术和根管治疗的术后短期疼痛及其对生活质量的影响:随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Neha Patel,&nbsp;Iftekhar Khan,&nbsp;Fadi Jarad,&nbsp;Angelo Zavattini,&nbsp;Garrit Koller,&nbsp;Tiago Pimentel,&nbsp;Kazim Mahmood,&nbsp;Francesco Mannocci","doi":"10.1111/iej.14144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Few studies focus upon patient-reported outcomes in endodontics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To determine whether full pulpotomy offers a less painful, improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with root canal treatment (RCT) in cases of irreversible pulpitis (IP) in the 7 days after the treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methodology</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred sixty-eight participants presenting with symptoms of IP were randomized to either pulpotomy (<i>n</i> = 86) or RCT (<i>n</i> = 82). Two participants were excluded, 61 participants underwent full pulpotomy with Biodentine (35.7%), 80 had RCT (46.8%), and 25 were randomized to have pulpotomy which progressed to RCT (PRCT) due to uncontrollable bleeding (14.6%). Clinical and radiographic assessments, using CBCT and periapical radiographs, were carried out preoperatively, for the evaluation of the results only CBCT images were used. Pain (VAS) and HRQoL (EQ 5D) assessments were carried out at baseline and Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 post-baseline. Analysis included descriptive and continuous variables, chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and two-sample <i>t</i>-tests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In pulpotomy and RCT groups, VAS pain decreased significantly over the first week (<i>p</i> &lt; .001). The magnitude of reduction was similar in RCT and pulpotomy (<i>p</i> = .804), RCT and PRCT (<i>p</i> = .179), pulpotomy vs. PRCT (<i>p</i> = .144) and in the comparison of combined RCT /PRCT groups (ORCT) with Pulpotomy (0.729). However, the overall level of VAS pain was significantly higher in the PRCT group than in the Pulpotomy (<i>p</i> = .045) and RCT group (<i>p</i> = .049). Using CBCT, significantly more radiolucencies were found in the PRCT group than in the pulpotomy group and overall teeth presenting with CBCT radiolucencies had significantly higher pain scores (<i>p</i> = .015), particularly at Days 1, 3 and 5. There were significant differences in many OHRQoL domains (Questions 1, 6, 11 and 12) between RCT and PRCT groups with higher frequencies of the impact of oral health problems at Day 0 and Day 7 in the PRCT group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In the treatment of IP, pulpotomy is as effective as RCT in reducing post-operative pain, and improving QoL and HRQoL, teeth displaying uncontrollable bleeding and periapical radiolucencies detected using CBCT are associated with more intense postoperative pain and lower QoL.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13724,"journal":{"name":"International endodontic journal","volume":"58 1","pages":"55-70"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The short-term postoperative pain and impact upon quality of life of pulpotomy and root canal treatment, in teeth with symptoms of irreversible pulpitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Neha Patel,&nbsp;Iftekhar Khan,&nbsp;Fadi Jarad,&nbsp;Angelo Zavattini,&nbsp;Garrit Koller,&nbsp;Tiago Pimentel,&nbsp;Kazim Mahmood,&nbsp;Francesco Mannocci\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iej.14144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Few studies focus upon patient-reported outcomes in endodontics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To determine whether full pulpotomy offers a less painful, improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with root canal treatment (RCT) in cases of irreversible pulpitis (IP) in the 7 days after the treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methodology</h3>\\n \\n <p>One hundred sixty-eight participants presenting with symptoms of IP were randomized to either pulpotomy (<i>n</i> = 86) or RCT (<i>n</i> = 82). Two participants were excluded, 61 participants underwent full pulpotomy with Biodentine (35.7%), 80 had RCT (46.8%), and 25 were randomized to have pulpotomy which progressed to RCT (PRCT) due to uncontrollable bleeding (14.6%). Clinical and radiographic assessments, using CBCT and periapical radiographs, were carried out preoperatively, for the evaluation of the results only CBCT images were used. Pain (VAS) and HRQoL (EQ 5D) assessments were carried out at baseline and Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 post-baseline. Analysis included descriptive and continuous variables, chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and two-sample <i>t</i>-tests.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In pulpotomy and RCT groups, VAS pain decreased significantly over the first week (<i>p</i> &lt; .001). The magnitude of reduction was similar in RCT and pulpotomy (<i>p</i> = .804), RCT and PRCT (<i>p</i> = .179), pulpotomy vs. PRCT (<i>p</i> = .144) and in the comparison of combined RCT /PRCT groups (ORCT) with Pulpotomy (0.729). However, the overall level of VAS pain was significantly higher in the PRCT group than in the Pulpotomy (<i>p</i> = .045) and RCT group (<i>p</i> = .049). Using CBCT, significantly more radiolucencies were found in the PRCT group than in the pulpotomy group and overall teeth presenting with CBCT radiolucencies had significantly higher pain scores (<i>p</i> = .015), particularly at Days 1, 3 and 5. There were significant differences in many OHRQoL domains (Questions 1, 6, 11 and 12) between RCT and PRCT groups with higher frequencies of the impact of oral health problems at Day 0 and Day 7 in the PRCT group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the treatment of IP, pulpotomy is as effective as RCT in reducing post-operative pain, and improving QoL and HRQoL, teeth displaying uncontrollable bleeding and periapical radiolucencies detected using CBCT are associated with more intense postoperative pain and lower QoL.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"55-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629050/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iej.14144\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International endodontic journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iej.14144","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:很少有研究关注根管治疗的患者报告结果:目的:确定与根管治疗(RCT)相比,全牙髓切断术是否能减轻不可逆性牙髓炎(IP)患者的痛苦,并在治疗后7天内改善与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL):168 名出现不可逆牙髓炎症状的患者随机接受了牙髓切断术(86 人)或根管治疗(82 人)。其中2人被排除在外,61人接受了使用Biodentine的全牙髓切断术(35.7%),80人接受了RCT(46.8%),25人随机接受了牙髓切断术,但由于出血无法控制而转为RCT(PRCT)(14.6%)。术前使用 CBCT 和根尖周X光片进行临床和放射学评估,评估结果仅使用 CBCT 图像。疼痛(VAS)和 HRQoL(EQ 5D)评估在基线和基线后第 1、3、5 和 7 天进行。分析包括描述性变量和连续变量、卡方检验、费雪精确检验和双样本 t 检验:结果:在髓核切除术组和 RCT 组中,VAS 疼痛在第一周明显减轻(P在治疗 IP 方面,牙髓切断术在减少术后疼痛、改善 QoL 和 HRQoL 方面与 RCT 一样有效,但使用 CBCT 检测到的无法控制的出血和根尖周放射状异常与更强烈的术后疼痛和更低的 QoL 有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The short-term postoperative pain and impact upon quality of life of pulpotomy and root canal treatment, in teeth with symptoms of irreversible pulpitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial

The short-term postoperative pain and impact upon quality of life of pulpotomy and root canal treatment, in teeth with symptoms of irreversible pulpitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Background

Few studies focus upon patient-reported outcomes in endodontics.

Aim

To determine whether full pulpotomy offers a less painful, improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with root canal treatment (RCT) in cases of irreversible pulpitis (IP) in the 7 days after the treatment.

Methodology

One hundred sixty-eight participants presenting with symptoms of IP were randomized to either pulpotomy (n = 86) or RCT (n = 82). Two participants were excluded, 61 participants underwent full pulpotomy with Biodentine (35.7%), 80 had RCT (46.8%), and 25 were randomized to have pulpotomy which progressed to RCT (PRCT) due to uncontrollable bleeding (14.6%). Clinical and radiographic assessments, using CBCT and periapical radiographs, were carried out preoperatively, for the evaluation of the results only CBCT images were used. Pain (VAS) and HRQoL (EQ 5D) assessments were carried out at baseline and Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 post-baseline. Analysis included descriptive and continuous variables, chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and two-sample t-tests.

Results

In pulpotomy and RCT groups, VAS pain decreased significantly over the first week (p < .001). The magnitude of reduction was similar in RCT and pulpotomy (p = .804), RCT and PRCT (p = .179), pulpotomy vs. PRCT (p = .144) and in the comparison of combined RCT /PRCT groups (ORCT) with Pulpotomy (0.729). However, the overall level of VAS pain was significantly higher in the PRCT group than in the Pulpotomy (p = .045) and RCT group (p = .049). Using CBCT, significantly more radiolucencies were found in the PRCT group than in the pulpotomy group and overall teeth presenting with CBCT radiolucencies had significantly higher pain scores (p = .015), particularly at Days 1, 3 and 5. There were significant differences in many OHRQoL domains (Questions 1, 6, 11 and 12) between RCT and PRCT groups with higher frequencies of the impact of oral health problems at Day 0 and Day 7 in the PRCT group.

Conclusion

In the treatment of IP, pulpotomy is as effective as RCT in reducing post-operative pain, and improving QoL and HRQoL, teeth displaying uncontrollable bleeding and periapical radiolucencies detected using CBCT are associated with more intense postoperative pain and lower QoL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International endodontic journal
International endodontic journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
28.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Endodontic Journal is published monthly and strives to publish original articles of the highest quality to disseminate scientific and clinical knowledge; all manuscripts are subjected to peer review. Original scientific articles are published in the areas of biomedical science, applied materials science, bioengineering, epidemiology and social science relevant to endodontic disease and its management, and to the restoration of root-treated teeth. In addition, review articles, reports of clinical cases, book reviews, summaries and abstracts of scientific meetings and news items are accepted. The International Endodontic Journal is essential reading for general dental practitioners, specialist endodontists, research, scientists and dental teachers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信