集合机器学习模型有助于诊断胃异位胰腺和胃间质瘤。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Kui Sun, Ying Wang, Rongchao Shi, Siyu Wu, Ximing Wang
{"title":"集合机器学习模型有助于诊断胃异位胰腺和胃间质瘤。","authors":"Kui Sun, Ying Wang, Rongchao Shi, Siyu Wu, Ximing Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13244-024-01809-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop an ensemble machine learning (eML) model using multiphase computed tomography (MPCT) for distinguishing between gastric ectopic pancreas (GEP) and gastric stromal tumors (GIST) in lesions < 3 cm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we retrospectively collected MPCT images from 138 patients between April 2017 and June 2023 across two centers. Cohort 1 comprised 94 patients divided into a training cohort and an internal validation cohort, while the 44 patients from Cohort 2 constituted the external validation cohort. Deep learning (DL) models were constructed based on the lesion region, and radiomics features were extracted to develop radiomics models, which were later integrated into the fusion model. Model performance was assessed through the analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The diagnostic efficacy of the optimal model was compared with that of a radiologist. Additionally, the radiologist with the assistance of the eML model provides a secondary diagnosis, to assess the potential clinical value of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After evaluation using an external validation cohort, the radiomics model demonstrated the highest performance in the venous phase, achieving AUROC of 0.87. The DL model showed optimal performance in the non-contrast phase, with AUROC of 0.81. The eML achieved the best performance across all models, with AUROC of 0.90. The use of eML-assisted analysis resulted in a significant improvement in the junior radiologist's accuracy, rising from 0.77 to 0.93 (p < 0.05). However, the senior radiologist's accuracy, while improving from 0.86 to 0.95, did not exhibit a statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>eML model based on MPCT can effectively distinguish between GEPs and GISTs < 3 cm.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>The multiphase CT-based fusion model, incorporating radiomics and DL technology, proves effective in distinguishing between GEP and gastric stromal tumors, serving as a valuable tool to enhance diagnoses and offering references for clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>No studies yet differentiated these tumors via radiomics or DL. Radiomics and DL methodologies unveil potentially distinct phenotypes within lesions. Quantitative analysis on CT for GIST and ectopic pancreas. Ensemble learning aids accurate diagnoses, assisting treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"15 1","pages":"225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ensemble machine learning model assists in the diagnosis of gastric ectopic pancreas and gastric stromal tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Kui Sun, Ying Wang, Rongchao Shi, Siyu Wu, Ximing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13244-024-01809-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop an ensemble machine learning (eML) model using multiphase computed tomography (MPCT) for distinguishing between gastric ectopic pancreas (GEP) and gastric stromal tumors (GIST) in lesions < 3 cm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we retrospectively collected MPCT images from 138 patients between April 2017 and June 2023 across two centers. Cohort 1 comprised 94 patients divided into a training cohort and an internal validation cohort, while the 44 patients from Cohort 2 constituted the external validation cohort. Deep learning (DL) models were constructed based on the lesion region, and radiomics features were extracted to develop radiomics models, which were later integrated into the fusion model. Model performance was assessed through the analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The diagnostic efficacy of the optimal model was compared with that of a radiologist. Additionally, the radiologist with the assistance of the eML model provides a secondary diagnosis, to assess the potential clinical value of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After evaluation using an external validation cohort, the radiomics model demonstrated the highest performance in the venous phase, achieving AUROC of 0.87. The DL model showed optimal performance in the non-contrast phase, with AUROC of 0.81. The eML achieved the best performance across all models, with AUROC of 0.90. The use of eML-assisted analysis resulted in a significant improvement in the junior radiologist's accuracy, rising from 0.77 to 0.93 (p < 0.05). However, the senior radiologist's accuracy, while improving from 0.86 to 0.95, did not exhibit a statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>eML model based on MPCT can effectively distinguish between GEPs and GISTs < 3 cm.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>The multiphase CT-based fusion model, incorporating radiomics and DL technology, proves effective in distinguishing between GEP and gastric stromal tumors, serving as a valuable tool to enhance diagnoses and offering references for clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>No studies yet differentiated these tumors via radiomics or DL. Radiomics and DL methodologies unveil potentially distinct phenotypes within lesions. Quantitative analysis on CT for GIST and ectopic pancreas. Ensemble learning aids accurate diagnoses, assisting treatment decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424595/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01809-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01809-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的利用多相计算机断层扫描(MPCT)开发一种集合机器学习(eML)模型,用于区分病变中的胃异位胰腺(GEP)和胃间质瘤(GIST) 方法:我们回顾性收集了两个中心在 2017 年 4 月至 2023 年 6 月期间 138 例患者的 MPCT 图像:在这项研究中,我们回顾性地收集了2017年4月至2023年6月期间两个中心138名患者的MPCT图像。队列 1 由 94 名患者组成,分为训练队列和内部验证队列,队列 2 的 44 名患者组成外部验证队列。根据病变区域构建深度学习(DL)模型,并提取放射组学特征来开发放射组学模型,随后将其整合到融合模型中。通过分析接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)来评估模型性能。最佳模型的诊断效果与放射科医生的诊断效果进行了比较。此外,放射科医生在 eML 模型的辅助下进行了二次诊断,以评估该模型的潜在临床价值:通过外部验证队列进行评估后,放射组学模型在静脉阶段表现最佳,AUROC 达到 0.87。DL 模型在非对比阶段表现最佳,AUROC 为 0.81。eML 在所有模型中表现最佳,AUROC 为 0.90。使用 eML 辅助分析后,初级放射医师的准确率显著提高,从 0.77 提高到 0.93(p 结论:基于 MPCT 的 eML 模型能有效区分 GEP 和 GIST 临界相关性声明:基于多相 CT 的融合模型结合了放射组学和 DL 技术,证明能有效区分 GEP 和胃间质瘤,是增强诊断的重要工具,并为临床决策提供参考:要点:目前还没有研究通过放射组学或 DL 对这些肿瘤进行区分。放射组学和 DL 方法揭示了病变内部潜在的不同表型。通过 CT 对 GIST 和异位胰腺进行定量分析。集合学习有助于准确诊断,辅助治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An ensemble machine learning model assists in the diagnosis of gastric ectopic pancreas and gastric stromal tumors.

Objective: To develop an ensemble machine learning (eML) model using multiphase computed tomography (MPCT) for distinguishing between gastric ectopic pancreas (GEP) and gastric stromal tumors (GIST) in lesions < 3 cm.

Methods: In this study, we retrospectively collected MPCT images from 138 patients between April 2017 and June 2023 across two centers. Cohort 1 comprised 94 patients divided into a training cohort and an internal validation cohort, while the 44 patients from Cohort 2 constituted the external validation cohort. Deep learning (DL) models were constructed based on the lesion region, and radiomics features were extracted to develop radiomics models, which were later integrated into the fusion model. Model performance was assessed through the analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The diagnostic efficacy of the optimal model was compared with that of a radiologist. Additionally, the radiologist with the assistance of the eML model provides a secondary diagnosis, to assess the potential clinical value of the model.

Results: After evaluation using an external validation cohort, the radiomics model demonstrated the highest performance in the venous phase, achieving AUROC of 0.87. The DL model showed optimal performance in the non-contrast phase, with AUROC of 0.81. The eML achieved the best performance across all models, with AUROC of 0.90. The use of eML-assisted analysis resulted in a significant improvement in the junior radiologist's accuracy, rising from 0.77 to 0.93 (p < 0.05). However, the senior radiologist's accuracy, while improving from 0.86 to 0.95, did not exhibit a statistically significant difference.

Conclusion: eML model based on MPCT can effectively distinguish between GEPs and GISTs < 3 cm.

Critical relevance statement: The multiphase CT-based fusion model, incorporating radiomics and DL technology, proves effective in distinguishing between GEP and gastric stromal tumors, serving as a valuable tool to enhance diagnoses and offering references for clinical decision-making.

Key points: No studies yet differentiated these tumors via radiomics or DL. Radiomics and DL methodologies unveil potentially distinct phenotypes within lesions. Quantitative analysis on CT for GIST and ectopic pancreas. Ensemble learning aids accurate diagnoses, assisting treatment decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信