亚洲国家强迫症患者的神经心理功能:系统回顾

Q3 Medicine
Innovations in clinical neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-09-01 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01
Uzma Ilyas, Sabeela Saher, Ayesha Ahmad Khan, Anam Shahid, Zarmeen Tariq
{"title":"亚洲国家强迫症患者的神经心理功能:系统回顾","authors":"Uzma Ilyas, Sabeela Saher, Ayesha Ahmad Khan, Anam Shahid, Zarmeen Tariq","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to identify the effect of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) on cognitive processes, such as memory, executive functioning, and cognitive flexibility, among the adult populations of Asian countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review progressed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. It is comprised of articles sourced from Asian countries published from 2018 to 2022, and literature about deficits in memory, executive functioning, and cognitive flexibility in the OCD population was gathered from five electronic databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Research Gate, Science Direct, and Wiley Online Library. Full-text impact factor articles in the English language were considered in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study screened 44 articles; five were included based on the eligibility criteria for the present systematic review. Four articles found cognitive deficits in the domains of executive functioning, memory, and cognitive flexibility among patients with OCD, whereas results of one article showed normal cognitive performance of the patients. Demographic variables showed no significant differences between patients with OCD and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review indicated deficits specifically in the cognitive functioning and flexibility of patients with OCD. Despite a noticeable prevalence of OCD in Asian countries, the literature on correlates and neurological functioning is scarce. Further studies are required to examine the effects on the larger population and provide knowledge in those countries and areas where people are suffering because of minimal knowledge regarding OCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13635,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in clinical neuroscience","volume":"21 7-9","pages":"22-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuropsychological Functioning Among Patients with OCD in Asian Countries: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Uzma Ilyas, Sabeela Saher, Ayesha Ahmad Khan, Anam Shahid, Zarmeen Tariq\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to identify the effect of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) on cognitive processes, such as memory, executive functioning, and cognitive flexibility, among the adult populations of Asian countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review progressed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. It is comprised of articles sourced from Asian countries published from 2018 to 2022, and literature about deficits in memory, executive functioning, and cognitive flexibility in the OCD population was gathered from five electronic databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Research Gate, Science Direct, and Wiley Online Library. Full-text impact factor articles in the English language were considered in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study screened 44 articles; five were included based on the eligibility criteria for the present systematic review. Four articles found cognitive deficits in the domains of executive functioning, memory, and cognitive flexibility among patients with OCD, whereas results of one article showed normal cognitive performance of the patients. Demographic variables showed no significant differences between patients with OCD and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review indicated deficits specifically in the cognitive functioning and flexibility of patients with OCD. Despite a noticeable prevalence of OCD in Asian countries, the literature on correlates and neurological functioning is scarce. Further studies are required to examine the effects on the larger population and provide knowledge in those countries and areas where people are suffering because of minimal knowledge regarding OCD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in clinical neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"21 7-9\",\"pages\":\"22-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424072/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in clinical neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in clinical neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述旨在确定强迫症对亚洲国家成年人的认知过程(如记忆、执行功能和认知灵活性)的影响:本系统综述旨在确定强迫症(OCD)对亚洲国家成年人的记忆、执行功能和认知灵活性等认知过程的影响:本系统综述根据系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。它由2018年至2022年发表的来自亚洲国家的文章组成,从谷歌学术、PubMed、Research Gate、Science Direct和Wiley Online Library等五个电子数据库中收集了有关强迫症人群记忆力、执行功能和认知灵活性缺陷的文献。本研究考虑的是具有影响因子的英文全文:本研究筛选了 44 篇文章,根据本系统综述的资格标准,有 5 篇文章被纳入其中。四篇文章发现强迫症患者在执行功能、记忆力和认知灵活性方面存在认知缺陷,而一篇文章的结果显示患者的认知表现正常。人口统计学变量显示,强迫症患者与健康对照组之间没有明显差异:本系统综述表明,强迫症患者在认知功能和灵活性方面存在缺陷。尽管强迫症在亚洲国家的发病率很高,但有关其相关因素和神经功能的文献却很少。我们需要进一步研究强迫症对更多人群的影响,并为那些因对强迫症知之甚少而饱受折磨的国家和地区提供相关知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuropsychological Functioning Among Patients with OCD in Asian Countries: A Systematic Review.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify the effect of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) on cognitive processes, such as memory, executive functioning, and cognitive flexibility, among the adult populations of Asian countries.

Methods: The systematic review progressed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. It is comprised of articles sourced from Asian countries published from 2018 to 2022, and literature about deficits in memory, executive functioning, and cognitive flexibility in the OCD population was gathered from five electronic databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Research Gate, Science Direct, and Wiley Online Library. Full-text impact factor articles in the English language were considered in this study.

Results: This study screened 44 articles; five were included based on the eligibility criteria for the present systematic review. Four articles found cognitive deficits in the domains of executive functioning, memory, and cognitive flexibility among patients with OCD, whereas results of one article showed normal cognitive performance of the patients. Demographic variables showed no significant differences between patients with OCD and healthy controls.

Conclusion: This systematic review indicated deficits specifically in the cognitive functioning and flexibility of patients with OCD. Despite a noticeable prevalence of OCD in Asian countries, the literature on correlates and neurological functioning is scarce. Further studies are required to examine the effects on the larger population and provide knowledge in those countries and areas where people are suffering because of minimal knowledge regarding OCD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovations in clinical neuroscience
Innovations in clinical neuroscience Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信