肝细胞癌患者可切除性分类模型。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ikuo Nakamura, Tomoaki Yoh, Takashi Nishimura, Masayuki Okuno, Tomohiro Okamoto, Hideaki Sueoka, Kenjiro Iida, Masaharu Tada, Takamichi Ishii, Satoru Seo, Yasuhiro Fujimoto, Hiroko Iijima, Seiko Hirono, Etsuro Hatano
{"title":"肝细胞癌患者可切除性分类模型。","authors":"Ikuo Nakamura, Tomoaki Yoh, Takashi Nishimura, Masayuki Okuno, Tomohiro Okamoto, Hideaki Sueoka, Kenjiro Iida, Masaharu Tada, Takamichi Ishii, Satoru Seo, Yasuhiro Fujimoto, Hiroko Iijima, Seiko Hirono, Etsuro Hatano","doi":"10.1111/hepr.14108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Some patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have poor outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to propose a new resectability classification for patients with HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We classified patients into three categories: resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), and unresectable (UR). Patients (n = 409) who underwent hepatectomy for HCC were assigned to the non-UR (R and BR classes combined; n = 285) and UR-HCC classes (n = 68; training cohort). Patient characteristics in the BR-HCC and R-HCC groups were compared. The new criteria were tested in a validation cohort (n = 295).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 285 patients, 229 and 56 were classified into the R- and BR-HCC classes, respectively, using macrovascular invasion, tumor size, and future liver remnant/modified albumin-bilirubin scores. Patients with BR-HCC demonstrated significantly worse progression-free and overall survival (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) than patients with R-HCC in the training cohort. Similar results were observed in the validation cohort. Multivariate analysis of the non-UR-HCC group in the training cohort revealed that the tumor number and BR-HCC were independent predictive factors for poor overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This classification can help select patients with BR-HCC for preoperative treatment before considering surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12987,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A classification model for resectability in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ikuo Nakamura, Tomoaki Yoh, Takashi Nishimura, Masayuki Okuno, Tomohiro Okamoto, Hideaki Sueoka, Kenjiro Iida, Masaharu Tada, Takamichi Ishii, Satoru Seo, Yasuhiro Fujimoto, Hiroko Iijima, Seiko Hirono, Etsuro Hatano\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hepr.14108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Some patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have poor outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to propose a new resectability classification for patients with HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We classified patients into three categories: resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), and unresectable (UR). Patients (n = 409) who underwent hepatectomy for HCC were assigned to the non-UR (R and BR classes combined; n = 285) and UR-HCC classes (n = 68; training cohort). Patient characteristics in the BR-HCC and R-HCC groups were compared. The new criteria were tested in a validation cohort (n = 295).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 285 patients, 229 and 56 were classified into the R- and BR-HCC classes, respectively, using macrovascular invasion, tumor size, and future liver remnant/modified albumin-bilirubin scores. Patients with BR-HCC demonstrated significantly worse progression-free and overall survival (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) than patients with R-HCC in the training cohort. Similar results were observed in the validation cohort. Multivariate analysis of the non-UR-HCC group in the training cohort revealed that the tumor number and BR-HCC were independent predictive factors for poor overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This classification can help select patients with BR-HCC for preoperative treatment before considering surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.14108\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.14108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:一些接受肝细胞癌(HCC)肝切除术的患者预后不佳。因此,我们旨在为 HCC 患者提出一种新的可切除性分类方法:我们将患者分为三类:可切除(R)、边缘可切除(BR)和不可切除(UR)。因HCC而接受肝切除术的患者(n = 409)被分配到非UR类(R类和BR类合计;n = 285)和UR-HCC类(n = 68;训练队列)。比较了BR-HCC组和R-HCC组的患者特征。新标准在验证队列(n = 295)中进行了测试:结果:根据大血管侵犯、肿瘤大小和未来残肝/改良白蛋白-胆红素评分,285 名患者中分别有 229 人和 56 人被分为 R-HCC 和 BR-HCC 组。BR-HCC患者的无进展生存期和总生存期明显更差(P 结论:该分类有助于选择BR-HCC患者:这种分类方法有助于选择BR-HCC患者进行术前治疗,然后再考虑手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A classification model for resectability in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Aim: Some patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have poor outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to propose a new resectability classification for patients with HCC.

Methods: We classified patients into three categories: resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), and unresectable (UR). Patients (n = 409) who underwent hepatectomy for HCC were assigned to the non-UR (R and BR classes combined; n = 285) and UR-HCC classes (n = 68; training cohort). Patient characteristics in the BR-HCC and R-HCC groups were compared. The new criteria were tested in a validation cohort (n = 295).

Results: Of the 285 patients, 229 and 56 were classified into the R- and BR-HCC classes, respectively, using macrovascular invasion, tumor size, and future liver remnant/modified albumin-bilirubin scores. Patients with BR-HCC demonstrated significantly worse progression-free and overall survival (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) than patients with R-HCC in the training cohort. Similar results were observed in the validation cohort. Multivariate analysis of the non-UR-HCC group in the training cohort revealed that the tumor number and BR-HCC were independent predictive factors for poor overall survival.

Conclusions: This classification can help select patients with BR-HCC for preoperative treatment before considering surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology Research
Hepatology Research 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
124
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hepatology Research (formerly International Hepatology Communications) is the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, and publishes original articles, reviews and short comunications dealing with hepatology. Reviews or mini-reviews are especially welcomed from those areas within hepatology undergoing rapid changes. Short communications should contain concise definitive information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信