{"title":"传染病区域间旅行的外部性和政策干预。","authors":"Naoshi Doi, Shingo Yamazaki","doi":"10.1002/hec.4900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper theoretically investigates externalities and policy interventions in travel during a pandemic. We develop a tractable static model of two regions from a short-run perspective. The model shows that the externalities can be both negative and positive, depending on regional asymmetry. Thus, even when infectious diseases are widespread, travel restrictions do not necessarily reduce infections and do not necessarily improve social welfare. A formula for the optimal policy intervention is derived and shown to be the weighted average of four types of externalities defined by the direction of travel and the epidemiological status of a traveler.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":"34 1","pages":"68-84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Externality and policy intervention in interregional travel with infectious diseases\",\"authors\":\"Naoshi Doi, Shingo Yamazaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hec.4900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper theoretically investigates externalities and policy interventions in travel during a pandemic. We develop a tractable static model of two regions from a short-run perspective. The model shows that the externalities can be both negative and positive, depending on regional asymmetry. Thus, even when infectious diseases are widespread, travel restrictions do not necessarily reduce infections and do not necessarily improve social welfare. A formula for the optimal policy intervention is derived and shown to be the weighted average of four types of externalities defined by the direction of travel and the epidemiological status of a traveler.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health economics\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"68-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.4900\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.4900","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Externality and policy intervention in interregional travel with infectious diseases
This paper theoretically investigates externalities and policy interventions in travel during a pandemic. We develop a tractable static model of two regions from a short-run perspective. The model shows that the externalities can be both negative and positive, depending on regional asymmetry. Thus, even when infectious diseases are widespread, travel restrictions do not necessarily reduce infections and do not necessarily improve social welfare. A formula for the optimal policy intervention is derived and shown to be the weighted average of four types of externalities defined by the direction of travel and the epidemiological status of a traveler.
期刊介绍:
This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems.
Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses.
Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.