提高对流感相关头痛的理解:关于流感头痛发病率和流行率的观点和建议--回应。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
David García-Azorín, Laura Santana-López, Ana Ordax-Díez, José Eugenio Lozano-Alonso, Diego Macias Saint-Gerons, Yésica González-Osorio, Silvia Rojo-Rello, José M. Eiros, Javier Sánchez-Martínez, Álvaro Sierra-Mencía, Andrea Recio-García, Ángel Luis Guerrero-Peral, Ivan Sanz-Muñoz
{"title":"提高对流感相关头痛的理解:关于流感头痛发病率和流行率的观点和建议--回应。","authors":"David García-Azorín,&nbsp;Laura Santana-López,&nbsp;Ana Ordax-Díez,&nbsp;José Eugenio Lozano-Alonso,&nbsp;Diego Macias Saint-Gerons,&nbsp;Yésica González-Osorio,&nbsp;Silvia Rojo-Rello,&nbsp;José M. Eiros,&nbsp;Javier Sánchez-Martínez,&nbsp;Álvaro Sierra-Mencía,&nbsp;Andrea Recio-García,&nbsp;Ángel Luis Guerrero-Peral,&nbsp;Ivan Sanz-Muñoz","doi":"10.1111/ene.16478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One of the strengths of this study was the systematic and consistent evaluation of a series of symptoms when patients seek medical attention at primary care [<span>1</span>]. This was done through a clinical in-person interview by a trained healthcare provider. Since headache was one of the evaluated symptoms, its incidence and prevalence could be assessed.</p><p>Khan et al. provided a series of suggestions that we acknowledge and would like to comment on [<span>2</span>]. In our understanding, the use of medication could have influenced the prevalence of headaches in the following ways: (a) symptomatic treatment could have decreased the duration of the headache, and by the time patients were evaluated in primary care the headache might not be present; (b) headaches could have started after the medical evaluation [<span>1</span>]. However, according to other studies, headaches seem to be an early symptom that typically resolves within 4 days [<span>3</span>]. If so, the true prevalence of headaches could be underestimated. Regarding the use of antiviral therapies, these require a medical prescription, so it is not possible that these could have modified the prevalence of headaches. It would be interesting for future studies to evaluate whether these therapies may modify the clinical phenotype and/or duration of headaches.</p><p>Regarding the role of epidemiological contacts and travel history, as an epidemic disorder it is common that the number of cases peaks during certain periods of the year when the transmission of the virus is higher within the population [<span>1</span>]. According to the literature, the main factors that seem to influence the virulence are the specific circulating strains and variants and the proportion of vaccinated individuals [<span>4</span>]. With more than 8000 studied patients and 12 influenza seasons, the picture seems comprehensive enough to evaluate possible annual differences, which did not seem to be that remarkable regarding headache epidemiology [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Concerning the probability of seeking medical attention, we believe that Khan et al. [<span>2</span>] refer to another publication from the same study [<span>5</span>]. In that study, as Khan et al. [<span>2</span>] point out, we did not prospectively follow up with patients, and we were only able to compare whether patients with headaches were referred to hospitals more or less frequently. It was observed that patients with headaches had 54% lower odds of being referred to the hospital, and it seemed clear that this was not observed by chance [<span>5</span>]. The reasons are not known with certainty. However, we hypothesize that the reason may be a more efficient immune response. Patients with headaches also had a higher frequency of other symptoms commonly associated with the immune response and the release of cytokines and interleukins. This has been observed with other acute viral infections, and we aim to validate it in future studies [<span>5, 6</span>].</p><p>We agree that prior influenza infections could play a relevant role, and not only these but also vaccination status, the circulating strain, and prior contact with other viral infections. It seems that immune memory against influenza does not last for life, and the circulating viruses vary from 1 year to another, with regional and national differences [<span>4</span>]. This was observed in our study, where patients infected by B subtypes had a higher frequency of headaches. In contrast, vaccination status did not yield any differences [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Regarding ‘psychological states’, stress and anxiety can trigger headaches in patients with pre-existing headaches, either primary headache disorders or secondary headaches. Primary headache disorders are highly prevalent, but their prevalence was lower than that observed in our study [<span>7</span>]. Psychiatric manifestations, delirium or hallucinations were out of the scope of the present study, which specifically focused on headaches, but in our opinion do not seem to explain the commonly experienced headaches in most patients.</p><p>D.G.-A. has received honoraria for lectures/presentations from AbbVie/Allergan, Eli Lilly, Teva, Lundbeck, and Novartis. D.G.-A. has participated in clinical trials as the principal investigator for Pfizer, BioHaven, and Lundbeck. D.G.-A. is junior editor of The Journal of Headache and Pain. D.G.-A. has received honoraria from the World Health Organization as a subject matter expert. Á.L.G.-P. has received honoraria for lectures/presentations from AbbVie/Allergan, Eli Lilly, Teva, Lundbeck, and Novartis. Á.L.G.-P. has participated in clinical trials as the principal investigator for Eli Lilly, Teva, AbbVie, Novartis, Amgen, and Lundbeck. None of the other authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.</p>","PeriodicalId":11954,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neurology","volume":"31 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved comprehension of influenza-related headaches: Perspectives and suggestions for incidence and prevalence of headache in influenza—Response\",\"authors\":\"David García-Azorín,&nbsp;Laura Santana-López,&nbsp;Ana Ordax-Díez,&nbsp;José Eugenio Lozano-Alonso,&nbsp;Diego Macias Saint-Gerons,&nbsp;Yésica González-Osorio,&nbsp;Silvia Rojo-Rello,&nbsp;José M. Eiros,&nbsp;Javier Sánchez-Martínez,&nbsp;Álvaro Sierra-Mencía,&nbsp;Andrea Recio-García,&nbsp;Ángel Luis Guerrero-Peral,&nbsp;Ivan Sanz-Muñoz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ene.16478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>One of the strengths of this study was the systematic and consistent evaluation of a series of symptoms when patients seek medical attention at primary care [<span>1</span>]. This was done through a clinical in-person interview by a trained healthcare provider. Since headache was one of the evaluated symptoms, its incidence and prevalence could be assessed.</p><p>Khan et al. provided a series of suggestions that we acknowledge and would like to comment on [<span>2</span>]. In our understanding, the use of medication could have influenced the prevalence of headaches in the following ways: (a) symptomatic treatment could have decreased the duration of the headache, and by the time patients were evaluated in primary care the headache might not be present; (b) headaches could have started after the medical evaluation [<span>1</span>]. However, according to other studies, headaches seem to be an early symptom that typically resolves within 4 days [<span>3</span>]. If so, the true prevalence of headaches could be underestimated. Regarding the use of antiviral therapies, these require a medical prescription, so it is not possible that these could have modified the prevalence of headaches. It would be interesting for future studies to evaluate whether these therapies may modify the clinical phenotype and/or duration of headaches.</p><p>Regarding the role of epidemiological contacts and travel history, as an epidemic disorder it is common that the number of cases peaks during certain periods of the year when the transmission of the virus is higher within the population [<span>1</span>]. According to the literature, the main factors that seem to influence the virulence are the specific circulating strains and variants and the proportion of vaccinated individuals [<span>4</span>]. With more than 8000 studied patients and 12 influenza seasons, the picture seems comprehensive enough to evaluate possible annual differences, which did not seem to be that remarkable regarding headache epidemiology [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Concerning the probability of seeking medical attention, we believe that Khan et al. [<span>2</span>] refer to another publication from the same study [<span>5</span>]. In that study, as Khan et al. [<span>2</span>] point out, we did not prospectively follow up with patients, and we were only able to compare whether patients with headaches were referred to hospitals more or less frequently. It was observed that patients with headaches had 54% lower odds of being referred to the hospital, and it seemed clear that this was not observed by chance [<span>5</span>]. The reasons are not known with certainty. However, we hypothesize that the reason may be a more efficient immune response. Patients with headaches also had a higher frequency of other symptoms commonly associated with the immune response and the release of cytokines and interleukins. This has been observed with other acute viral infections, and we aim to validate it in future studies [<span>5, 6</span>].</p><p>We agree that prior influenza infections could play a relevant role, and not only these but also vaccination status, the circulating strain, and prior contact with other viral infections. It seems that immune memory against influenza does not last for life, and the circulating viruses vary from 1 year to another, with regional and national differences [<span>4</span>]. This was observed in our study, where patients infected by B subtypes had a higher frequency of headaches. In contrast, vaccination status did not yield any differences [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Regarding ‘psychological states’, stress and anxiety can trigger headaches in patients with pre-existing headaches, either primary headache disorders or secondary headaches. Primary headache disorders are highly prevalent, but their prevalence was lower than that observed in our study [<span>7</span>]. Psychiatric manifestations, delirium or hallucinations were out of the scope of the present study, which specifically focused on headaches, but in our opinion do not seem to explain the commonly experienced headaches in most patients.</p><p>D.G.-A. has received honoraria for lectures/presentations from AbbVie/Allergan, Eli Lilly, Teva, Lundbeck, and Novartis. D.G.-A. has participated in clinical trials as the principal investigator for Pfizer, BioHaven, and Lundbeck. D.G.-A. is junior editor of The Journal of Headache and Pain. D.G.-A. has received honoraria from the World Health Organization as a subject matter expert. Á.L.G.-P. has received honoraria for lectures/presentations from AbbVie/Allergan, Eli Lilly, Teva, Lundbeck, and Novartis. Á.L.G.-P. has participated in clinical trials as the principal investigator for Eli Lilly, Teva, AbbVie, Novartis, Amgen, and Lundbeck. None of the other authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"31 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554866/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.16478\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.16478","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的优势之一是对患者在基层医疗机构就医时的一系列症状进行了系统而一致的评估[1]。这是由受过培训的医护人员通过临床面谈完成的。由于头痛是评估的症状之一,因此可以对其发生率和流行率进行评估。Khan 等人提出了一系列建议,我们对这些建议表示认可,并希望对其进行评论[2]。根据我们的理解,药物的使用可能会通过以下方式影响头痛的发生率:(a)对症治疗可能会缩短头痛的持续时间,当患者接受初级保健评估时,头痛可能已经不存在了;(b)头痛可能是在医疗评估后开始出现的[1]。然而,根据其他研究,头痛似乎是一种早期症状,通常在 4 天内缓解[3]。如果是这样,头痛的真实发病率可能会被低估。关于抗病毒疗法的使用,这些疗法需要医生处方,因此不可能改变头痛的发病率。关于流行病学接触者和旅行史的作用,作为一种流行性疾病,病例数在一年中的某些时期达到高峰是很常见的,因为此时病毒在人群中的传播率较高[1]。根据文献,影响病毒毒性的主要因素似乎是特定的流行毒株和变异株以及接种疫苗者的比例[4]。通过对 8000 多名患者和 12 个流感季节的研究,我们可以全面地评估每年可能出现的差异,而这些差异在头痛流行病学方面似乎并不显著[1]。在该研究中,正如 Khan 等人[2]所指出的,我们并没有对患者进行前瞻性随访,我们只能比较头痛患者被转诊到医院的频率是高还是低。据观察,头痛患者被转诊到医院的几率要低 54%,这显然不是偶然现象[5]。原因尚不明确。不过,我们假设原因可能是免疫反应更有效。头痛患者出现其他症状的频率也较高,这些症状通常与免疫反应以及细胞因子和白细胞介素的释放有关。我们同意,之前的流感感染可能会起到相关作用,不仅如此,疫苗接种情况、流行毒株以及之前与其他病毒感染的接触也会起到相关作用。对流感的免疫记忆似乎不会持续终生,而且不同年份的流行病毒也不尽相同,地区和国家之间也存在差异[4]。在我们的研究中就发现了这种情况,感染 B 亚型的患者头痛的频率更高。与此相反,疫苗接种情况并没有产生任何差异[1]。关于 "心理状态",压力和焦虑可能会引发原有头痛患者的头痛,无论是原发性头痛疾病还是继发性头痛。原发性头痛疾病的发病率很高,但其发病率低于我们的研究[7]。精神表现、谵妄或幻觉不在本研究的范围之内,本研究特别关注头痛,但我们认为这似乎不能解释大多数患者常见的头痛。D.G.-A. 曾作为辉瑞、BioHaven 和灵北的主要研究者参与临床试验。D.G.-A. 是《头痛与疼痛杂志》的初级编辑。作为主题专家,D.G.-A.获得了世界卫生组织的酬金。Á.L.G.-P. 从 AbbVie/Allergan、Eli Lilly、Teva、Lundbeck 和 Novartis 领取了讲座/演讲酬金。Á.L.G.-P. 作为主要研究者参与了礼来、梯瓦、艾伯维、诺华、安进和灵北的临床试验。其他作者均未披露任何利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved comprehension of influenza-related headaches: Perspectives and suggestions for incidence and prevalence of headache in influenza—Response

One of the strengths of this study was the systematic and consistent evaluation of a series of symptoms when patients seek medical attention at primary care [1]. This was done through a clinical in-person interview by a trained healthcare provider. Since headache was one of the evaluated symptoms, its incidence and prevalence could be assessed.

Khan et al. provided a series of suggestions that we acknowledge and would like to comment on [2]. In our understanding, the use of medication could have influenced the prevalence of headaches in the following ways: (a) symptomatic treatment could have decreased the duration of the headache, and by the time patients were evaluated in primary care the headache might not be present; (b) headaches could have started after the medical evaluation [1]. However, according to other studies, headaches seem to be an early symptom that typically resolves within 4 days [3]. If so, the true prevalence of headaches could be underestimated. Regarding the use of antiviral therapies, these require a medical prescription, so it is not possible that these could have modified the prevalence of headaches. It would be interesting for future studies to evaluate whether these therapies may modify the clinical phenotype and/or duration of headaches.

Regarding the role of epidemiological contacts and travel history, as an epidemic disorder it is common that the number of cases peaks during certain periods of the year when the transmission of the virus is higher within the population [1]. According to the literature, the main factors that seem to influence the virulence are the specific circulating strains and variants and the proportion of vaccinated individuals [4]. With more than 8000 studied patients and 12 influenza seasons, the picture seems comprehensive enough to evaluate possible annual differences, which did not seem to be that remarkable regarding headache epidemiology [1].

Concerning the probability of seeking medical attention, we believe that Khan et al. [2] refer to another publication from the same study [5]. In that study, as Khan et al. [2] point out, we did not prospectively follow up with patients, and we were only able to compare whether patients with headaches were referred to hospitals more or less frequently. It was observed that patients with headaches had 54% lower odds of being referred to the hospital, and it seemed clear that this was not observed by chance [5]. The reasons are not known with certainty. However, we hypothesize that the reason may be a more efficient immune response. Patients with headaches also had a higher frequency of other symptoms commonly associated with the immune response and the release of cytokines and interleukins. This has been observed with other acute viral infections, and we aim to validate it in future studies [5, 6].

We agree that prior influenza infections could play a relevant role, and not only these but also vaccination status, the circulating strain, and prior contact with other viral infections. It seems that immune memory against influenza does not last for life, and the circulating viruses vary from 1 year to another, with regional and national differences [4]. This was observed in our study, where patients infected by B subtypes had a higher frequency of headaches. In contrast, vaccination status did not yield any differences [1].

Regarding ‘psychological states’, stress and anxiety can trigger headaches in patients with pre-existing headaches, either primary headache disorders or secondary headaches. Primary headache disorders are highly prevalent, but their prevalence was lower than that observed in our study [7]. Psychiatric manifestations, delirium or hallucinations were out of the scope of the present study, which specifically focused on headaches, but in our opinion do not seem to explain the commonly experienced headaches in most patients.

D.G.-A. has received honoraria for lectures/presentations from AbbVie/Allergan, Eli Lilly, Teva, Lundbeck, and Novartis. D.G.-A. has participated in clinical trials as the principal investigator for Pfizer, BioHaven, and Lundbeck. D.G.-A. is junior editor of The Journal of Headache and Pain. D.G.-A. has received honoraria from the World Health Organization as a subject matter expert. Á.L.G.-P. has received honoraria for lectures/presentations from AbbVie/Allergan, Eli Lilly, Teva, Lundbeck, and Novartis. Á.L.G.-P. has participated in clinical trials as the principal investigator for Eli Lilly, Teva, AbbVie, Novartis, Amgen, and Lundbeck. None of the other authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neurology
European Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
418
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Neurology is the official journal of the European Academy of Neurology and covers all areas of clinical and basic research in neurology, including pre-clinical research of immediate translational value for new potential treatments. Emphasis is placed on major diseases of large clinical and socio-economic importance (dementia, stroke, epilepsy, headache, multiple sclerosis, movement disorders, and infectious diseases).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信