病人性别对治疗上限决定的影响:欧洲急诊医生在模拟病例中的治疗决定研究。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
European Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001176
Amélie Vromant, Karine Alamé, Clémentine Cassard, Ben Bloom, Oscar Miró, Yonathan Freund
{"title":"病人性别对治疗上限决定的影响:欧洲急诊医生在模拟病例中的治疗决定研究。","authors":"Amélie Vromant, Karine Alamé, Clémentine Cassard, Ben Bloom, Oscar Miró, Yonathan Freund","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Gender bias in healthcare can significantly influence clinical decision-making, potentially leading to disparities in treatment outcomes. This study addresses the impact of patient gender on the decision-making process for establishing a ceiling of care in emergency medicine, particularly the decision to limit tracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether patient gender influences emergency physicians' decisions regarding the recommendation for tracheal intubation in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A European survey-based study was conducted using a standardized clinical scenario to assess physicians' decisions in a controlled setting.</p><p><strong>Settings and participants: </strong>The survey targeted European emergency physicians over a 2-week period in April 2024. A total of 3423 physicians participated, with a median age of 40 years and a distribution of 46% women. Physicians were presented with a clinical vignette of a 75-year-old patient in acute respiratory distress. The vignettes were randomized to vary only by the patient's gender (woman/man) and level of functional status: (1) can grocery shop alone, (2) cannot grocery shop alone but can bathe independently, or (3) cannot perform either task independently.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The primary outcome was the recommendation for intubation, with secondary analyses exploring the influence of patient functional status levels. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders, including physician gender, age, experience, and practice setting.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>A total of 3423 physicians responded, mostly from France, Spain, Italy, and the UK (1,532, 494, 247, and 245 respectively). Women patients were less likely to be intubated compared to male patients [67.9% vs. 71.7%; difference 3.81%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.7-6.9%]. The likelihood of recommending intubation decreased with lower levels of patient functional status. Women physician gender was also associated with a reduced likelihood of recommending intubation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests a significant gender-based disparity in emergency care decision-making, with women patients being less likely to receive recommendations for intubation. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to potential limitations in the representativity of respondents and the uncertain applicability of survey responses to real-life clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"423-428"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of patient gender on the decision of ceiling of care: an European study of emergency physicians' treatment decisions in simulated cases.\",\"authors\":\"Amélie Vromant, Karine Alamé, Clémentine Cassard, Ben Bloom, Oscar Miró, Yonathan Freund\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Gender bias in healthcare can significantly influence clinical decision-making, potentially leading to disparities in treatment outcomes. This study addresses the impact of patient gender on the decision-making process for establishing a ceiling of care in emergency medicine, particularly the decision to limit tracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether patient gender influences emergency physicians' decisions regarding the recommendation for tracheal intubation in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A European survey-based study was conducted using a standardized clinical scenario to assess physicians' decisions in a controlled setting.</p><p><strong>Settings and participants: </strong>The survey targeted European emergency physicians over a 2-week period in April 2024. A total of 3423 physicians participated, with a median age of 40 years and a distribution of 46% women. Physicians were presented with a clinical vignette of a 75-year-old patient in acute respiratory distress. The vignettes were randomized to vary only by the patient's gender (woman/man) and level of functional status: (1) can grocery shop alone, (2) cannot grocery shop alone but can bathe independently, or (3) cannot perform either task independently.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The primary outcome was the recommendation for intubation, with secondary analyses exploring the influence of patient functional status levels. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders, including physician gender, age, experience, and practice setting.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>A total of 3423 physicians responded, mostly from France, Spain, Italy, and the UK (1,532, 494, 247, and 245 respectively). Women patients were less likely to be intubated compared to male patients [67.9% vs. 71.7%; difference 3.81%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.7-6.9%]. The likelihood of recommending intubation decreased with lower levels of patient functional status. Women physician gender was also associated with a reduced likelihood of recommending intubation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests a significant gender-based disparity in emergency care decision-making, with women patients being less likely to receive recommendations for intubation. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to potential limitations in the representativity of respondents and the uncertain applicability of survey responses to real-life clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"423-428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001176\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和重要性:医疗保健中的性别偏见会严重影响临床决策,从而可能导致治疗结果的差异。本研究探讨了急诊医学中患者性别对确定护理上限的决策过程的影响,尤其是对限制气管插管的决策的影响:目的:确定患者性别是否会影响急诊科医生对危重病人气管插管建议的决策:设计:在欧洲开展了一项基于调查的研究,采用标准化临床情景,在可控环境中评估医生的决定:调查对象为欧洲急诊科医生,调查时间为 2024 年 4 月,为期两周。共有 3423 名医生参与了调查,其中年龄中位数为 40 岁,女性占 46%。调查人员向医生展示了一名 75 岁急性呼吸窘迫患者的临床小故事。小故事仅根据患者的性别(女性/男性)和功能状态水平随机变化:(1) 能独自买菜,(2) 不能独自买菜但能独立洗澡,或 (3) 不能独立完成任何一项任务:主要结果是插管建议,次要分析探讨患者功能状态水平的影响。采用多变量逻辑回归调整潜在的混杂因素,包括医生的性别、年龄、经验和执业环境:共有 3423 名医生做出了回应,其中大部分来自法国、西班牙、意大利和英国(分别为 1532 人、494 人、247 人和 245 人)。与男性患者相比,女性患者插管的可能性较低[67.9% vs. 71.7%;差异为3.81%;95%置信区间(CI),0.7-6.9%]。患者功能状态越差,建议插管的可能性越低。女医生的性别也与推荐插管的可能性降低有关:本研究表明,急诊护理决策中存在明显的性别差异,女性患者获得插管建议的可能性较低。然而,由于受访者的代表性可能存在局限性,而且调查答复对实际临床实践的适用性也不确定,因此在解释这些结果时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of patient gender on the decision of ceiling of care: an European study of emergency physicians' treatment decisions in simulated cases.

Background and importance: Gender bias in healthcare can significantly influence clinical decision-making, potentially leading to disparities in treatment outcomes. This study addresses the impact of patient gender on the decision-making process for establishing a ceiling of care in emergency medicine, particularly the decision to limit tracheal intubation.

Objective: To determine whether patient gender influences emergency physicians' decisions regarding the recommendation for tracheal intubation in critically ill patients.

Design: A European survey-based study was conducted using a standardized clinical scenario to assess physicians' decisions in a controlled setting.

Settings and participants: The survey targeted European emergency physicians over a 2-week period in April 2024. A total of 3423 physicians participated, with a median age of 40 years and a distribution of 46% women. Physicians were presented with a clinical vignette of a 75-year-old patient in acute respiratory distress. The vignettes were randomized to vary only by the patient's gender (woman/man) and level of functional status: (1) can grocery shop alone, (2) cannot grocery shop alone but can bathe independently, or (3) cannot perform either task independently.

Outcome measures and analysis: The primary outcome was the recommendation for intubation, with secondary analyses exploring the influence of patient functional status levels. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders, including physician gender, age, experience, and practice setting.

Main results: A total of 3423 physicians responded, mostly from France, Spain, Italy, and the UK (1,532, 494, 247, and 245 respectively). Women patients were less likely to be intubated compared to male patients [67.9% vs. 71.7%; difference 3.81%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.7-6.9%]. The likelihood of recommending intubation decreased with lower levels of patient functional status. Women physician gender was also associated with a reduced likelihood of recommending intubation.

Conclusion: This study suggests a significant gender-based disparity in emergency care decision-making, with women patients being less likely to receive recommendations for intubation. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to potential limitations in the representativity of respondents and the uncertain applicability of survey responses to real-life clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field. Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信