在门诊环境中实施静脉心血管治疗的障碍和促进因素。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mohamed B. Jalloh, Ian Osoro, James L. Januzzi, Alka Shaunik, M. Cecilia Bahit, Serge Korjian, C. Michael Gibson, Harriette G.C. Van Spall
{"title":"在门诊环境中实施静脉心血管治疗的障碍和促进因素。","authors":"Mohamed B. Jalloh,&nbsp;Ian Osoro,&nbsp;James L. Januzzi,&nbsp;Alka Shaunik,&nbsp;M. Cecilia Bahit,&nbsp;Serge Korjian,&nbsp;C. Michael Gibson,&nbsp;Harriette G.C. Van Spall","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Intravenous (IV) therapies have transformed the management of various cardiovascular conditions in ambulatory patients. However, uptake of these therapies in ambulatory care settings has several barriers. In this systematic scoping review, we aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators that influence the implementation of current IV therapies in ambulatory settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases from inception to September 2023 for studies on barriers and facilitators of IV therapy uptake in ambulatory patients. We classified the identified factors and performed a thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen studies, primarily conducted in North America and Europe, were included. Methodologies varied, precluding quantitative synthesis. Key barriers were identified across several levels. At the medication level, barriers included the need for multiple vials and lengthy preparation. Patient-level barriers included adverse effects, infections, painful venous access and non-adherence. Clinician-level barriers included understaffing, time constraints and safety concerns. Institutional barriers ranged from staff or equipment shortages to liability concerns and complex logistics. Healthcare system barriers included financial constraints and limited care delivery services. Facilitators included evidence-based indications, patient education and comfort, staff experience, guidance documents, safe settings, favourable insurance policies and supportive guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>As novel IV treatments emerge, addressing barriers and leveraging facilitators preemptively can enhance the successful implementation of IV therapies and improve clinical outcomes in ambulatory settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":"12 1","pages":"695-700"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11769616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to implementation of intravenous cardiovascular treatments in ambulatory settings\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed B. Jalloh,&nbsp;Ian Osoro,&nbsp;James L. Januzzi,&nbsp;Alka Shaunik,&nbsp;M. Cecilia Bahit,&nbsp;Serge Korjian,&nbsp;C. Michael Gibson,&nbsp;Harriette G.C. Van Spall\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ehf2.15076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Intravenous (IV) therapies have transformed the management of various cardiovascular conditions in ambulatory patients. However, uptake of these therapies in ambulatory care settings has several barriers. In this systematic scoping review, we aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators that influence the implementation of current IV therapies in ambulatory settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases from inception to September 2023 for studies on barriers and facilitators of IV therapy uptake in ambulatory patients. We classified the identified factors and performed a thematic analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifteen studies, primarily conducted in North America and Europe, were included. Methodologies varied, precluding quantitative synthesis. Key barriers were identified across several levels. At the medication level, barriers included the need for multiple vials and lengthy preparation. Patient-level barriers included adverse effects, infections, painful venous access and non-adherence. Clinician-level barriers included understaffing, time constraints and safety concerns. Institutional barriers ranged from staff or equipment shortages to liability concerns and complex logistics. Healthcare system barriers included financial constraints and limited care delivery services. Facilitators included evidence-based indications, patient education and comfort, staff experience, guidance documents, safe settings, favourable insurance policies and supportive guidelines.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>As novel IV treatments emerge, addressing barriers and leveraging facilitators preemptively can enhance the successful implementation of IV therapies and improve clinical outcomes in ambulatory settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"695-700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11769616/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.15076\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.15076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:静脉注射疗法改变了门诊病人各种心血管疾病的治疗方法。然而,在非卧床护理环境中采用这些疗法却面临着一些障碍。在这篇系统性范围综述中,我们旨在确定影响目前非住院环境中静脉注射疗法实施的障碍和促进因素:我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CINAHL 数据库中从开始到 2023 年 9 月有关非住院患者接受静脉注射疗法的障碍和促进因素的研究。我们对确定的因素进行了分类,并进行了专题分析:结果:共纳入 15 项研究,主要在北美和欧洲进行。研究方法各不相同,因此无法进行定量分析。研究发现了多个层面的关键障碍。在药物层面,障碍包括需要多个药瓶和冗长的准备过程。患者层面的障碍包括不良反应、感染、静脉通道疼痛和不依从。临床医生层面的障碍包括人手不足、时间限制和安全问题。机构层面的障碍包括人员或设备短缺、责任问题和复杂的物流。医疗保健系统的障碍包括资金限制和有限的护理服务。促进因素包括循证适应症、患者教育和舒适度、员工经验、指导文件、安全环境、有利的保险政策和支持性指南:结论:随着新型静脉注射疗法的出现,预先消除障碍和利用有利因素可促进静脉注射疗法的成功实施,并改善门诊环境中的临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of intravenous cardiovascular treatments in ambulatory settings

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of intravenous cardiovascular treatments in ambulatory settings

Aims

Intravenous (IV) therapies have transformed the management of various cardiovascular conditions in ambulatory patients. However, uptake of these therapies in ambulatory care settings has several barriers. In this systematic scoping review, we aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators that influence the implementation of current IV therapies in ambulatory settings.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases from inception to September 2023 for studies on barriers and facilitators of IV therapy uptake in ambulatory patients. We classified the identified factors and performed a thematic analysis.

Results

Fifteen studies, primarily conducted in North America and Europe, were included. Methodologies varied, precluding quantitative synthesis. Key barriers were identified across several levels. At the medication level, barriers included the need for multiple vials and lengthy preparation. Patient-level barriers included adverse effects, infections, painful venous access and non-adherence. Clinician-level barriers included understaffing, time constraints and safety concerns. Institutional barriers ranged from staff or equipment shortages to liability concerns and complex logistics. Healthcare system barriers included financial constraints and limited care delivery services. Facilitators included evidence-based indications, patient education and comfort, staff experience, guidance documents, safe settings, favourable insurance policies and supportive guidelines.

Conclusions

As novel IV treatments emerge, addressing barriers and leveraging facilitators preemptively can enhance the successful implementation of IV therapies and improve clinical outcomes in ambulatory settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ESC Heart Failure
ESC Heart Failure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
461
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信