利用三维点云和基于图的神经网络改进胸部 CT 肺功能测试的估算。

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY
{"title":"利用三维点云和基于图的神经网络改进胸部 CT 肺功能测试的估算。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are important clinical metrics to measure the severity of interstitial lung disease for systemic sclerosis patients. However, PFTs cannot always be performed by spirometry if there is a risk of disease transmission or other contraindications. In addition, it is unclear how lung function is affected by changes in lung vessels. Therefore, convolution neural networks (CNNs) were previously proposed to estimate PFTs from chest CT scans (CNN-CT) and extracted vessels (CNN-Vessel). Due to GPU memory constraints, however, these networks used down-sampled images, which causes a loss of information on small vessels. Previous literature has indicated that detailed vessel information from CT scans can be helpful for PFT estimation. Therefore, this paper proposes to use a point cloud neural network (PNN-Vessel) and graph neural network (GNN-Vessel) to estimate PFTs from point cloud and graph-based representations of pulmonary vessel centerlines, respectively. After that, we combine different networks and perform multiple variable step-wise regression analysis to explore if vessel-based networks can contribute to the PFT estimation, in addition to CNN-CT. Results showed that both PNN-Vessel and GNN-Vessel outperformed CNN-Vessel, by 14% and 4%, respectively, when averaged across the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) scores of four PFTs metrics. In addition, compared to CNN-Vessel, PNN-Vessel used 30% of training time (1.1 h) and 7% parameters (2.1 M) and GNN-Vessel used only 7% training time (0.25 h) and 0.7% parameters (0.2 M). We combined CNN-CT, PNN-Vessel and GNN-Vessel with the weights obtained from multiple variable regression methods, which achieved the best PFT estimation accuracy (ICC of 0.748, 0.742, 0.836 and 0.835 for the four PFT measures respectively). The results verified that more detailed vessel information could provide further explanation for PFT estimation from anatomical imaging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using 3D point cloud and graph-based neural networks to improve the estimation of pulmonary function tests from chest CT\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are important clinical metrics to measure the severity of interstitial lung disease for systemic sclerosis patients. However, PFTs cannot always be performed by spirometry if there is a risk of disease transmission or other contraindications. In addition, it is unclear how lung function is affected by changes in lung vessels. Therefore, convolution neural networks (CNNs) were previously proposed to estimate PFTs from chest CT scans (CNN-CT) and extracted vessels (CNN-Vessel). Due to GPU memory constraints, however, these networks used down-sampled images, which causes a loss of information on small vessels. Previous literature has indicated that detailed vessel information from CT scans can be helpful for PFT estimation. Therefore, this paper proposes to use a point cloud neural network (PNN-Vessel) and graph neural network (GNN-Vessel) to estimate PFTs from point cloud and graph-based representations of pulmonary vessel centerlines, respectively. After that, we combine different networks and perform multiple variable step-wise regression analysis to explore if vessel-based networks can contribute to the PFT estimation, in addition to CNN-CT. Results showed that both PNN-Vessel and GNN-Vessel outperformed CNN-Vessel, by 14% and 4%, respectively, when averaged across the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) scores of four PFTs metrics. In addition, compared to CNN-Vessel, PNN-Vessel used 30% of training time (1.1 h) and 7% parameters (2.1 M) and GNN-Vessel used only 7% training time (0.25 h) and 0.7% parameters (0.2 M). We combined CNN-CT, PNN-Vessel and GNN-Vessel with the weights obtained from multiple variable regression methods, which achieved the best PFT estimation accuracy (ICC of 0.748, 0.742, 0.836 and 0.835 for the four PFT measures respectively). The results verified that more detailed vessel information could provide further explanation for PFT estimation from anatomical imaging.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in biology and medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in biology and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524012770\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524012770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺功能检查(PFT)是衡量系统性硬化症患者间质性肺病严重程度的重要临床指标。然而,如果存在疾病传播的风险或其他禁忌症,就不能总是通过肺活量测定来进行肺功能测试。此外,肺功能如何受到肺血管变化的影响尚不清楚。因此,以前曾有人提出用卷积神经网络(CNN)从胸部 CT 扫描(CNN-CT)和提取的血管(CNN-Vessel)中估算 PFT。然而,由于 GPU 内存的限制,这些网络使用的是向下采样的图像,这会导致小血管信息的丢失。以往的文献表明,CT 扫描中的详细血管信息有助于 PFT 估算。因此,本文提出使用点云神经网络(PNN-Vessel)和图神经网络(GNN-Vessel),分别从点云和基于图的肺血管中心线表征来估计 PFT。之后,我们将不同的网络结合起来,并进行多变量逐步回归分析,以探讨除 CNN-CT 外,基于血管的网络是否也能为 PFT 估算做出贡献。结果表明,在四个 PFT 指标的类内相关系数 (ICC) 分数平均值上,PNN-Vessel 和 GNN-Vessel 的性能分别比 CNN-Vessel 高出 14% 和 4%。此外,与 CNN-Vessel 相比,PNN-Vessel 使用了 30% 的训练时间(1.1 小时)和 7% 的参数(2.1 M),而 GNN-Vessel 仅使用了 7% 的训练时间(0.25 小时)和 0.7% 的参数(0.2 M)。我们将 CNN-CT、PNN-Vessel 和 GNN-Vessel 与多元变量回归方法获得的权重相结合,获得了最佳的 PFT 估计精度(四种 PFT 指标的 ICC 分别为 0.748、0.742、0.836 和 0.835)。结果证实,更详细的血管信息可为解剖成像的 PFT 估计提供进一步解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using 3D point cloud and graph-based neural networks to improve the estimation of pulmonary function tests from chest CT
Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are important clinical metrics to measure the severity of interstitial lung disease for systemic sclerosis patients. However, PFTs cannot always be performed by spirometry if there is a risk of disease transmission or other contraindications. In addition, it is unclear how lung function is affected by changes in lung vessels. Therefore, convolution neural networks (CNNs) were previously proposed to estimate PFTs from chest CT scans (CNN-CT) and extracted vessels (CNN-Vessel). Due to GPU memory constraints, however, these networks used down-sampled images, which causes a loss of information on small vessels. Previous literature has indicated that detailed vessel information from CT scans can be helpful for PFT estimation. Therefore, this paper proposes to use a point cloud neural network (PNN-Vessel) and graph neural network (GNN-Vessel) to estimate PFTs from point cloud and graph-based representations of pulmonary vessel centerlines, respectively. After that, we combine different networks and perform multiple variable step-wise regression analysis to explore if vessel-based networks can contribute to the PFT estimation, in addition to CNN-CT. Results showed that both PNN-Vessel and GNN-Vessel outperformed CNN-Vessel, by 14% and 4%, respectively, when averaged across the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) scores of four PFTs metrics. In addition, compared to CNN-Vessel, PNN-Vessel used 30% of training time (1.1 h) and 7% parameters (2.1 M) and GNN-Vessel used only 7% training time (0.25 h) and 0.7% parameters (0.2 M). We combined CNN-CT, PNN-Vessel and GNN-Vessel with the weights obtained from multiple variable regression methods, which achieved the best PFT estimation accuracy (ICC of 0.748, 0.742, 0.836 and 0.835 for the four PFT measures respectively). The results verified that more detailed vessel information could provide further explanation for PFT estimation from anatomical imaging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信