非肌层浸润性膀胱癌膀胱内注射莫罗波兰子菌株的长期疗效和安全性。

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-28 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2024.01
Wiktor Bursiewicz, Monika Złotkiewicz, Wojciech Krajewski, Krzysztof Tupikowski, Jan Kołodziej, Rolf Jünemann, Tobias Mudra, Stefanie Witecy, Tomasz Szydełko, Anna Kołodziej
{"title":"非肌层浸润性膀胱癌膀胱内注射莫罗波兰子菌株的长期疗效和安全性。","authors":"Wiktor Bursiewicz, Monika Złotkiewicz, Wojciech Krajewski, Krzysztof Tupikowski, Jan Kołodziej, Rolf Jünemann, Tobias Mudra, Stefanie Witecy, Tomasz Szydełko, Anna Kołodziej","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Moreau is under-represented in literature and comparisons with other BCG strains are rare.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective data analysis in patients with intermediate or high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) to assess effectiveness and safety of BCG Moreau Polish substrain to BCG RIVM. The primary objective was to describe the real-world effectiveness of BCG Moreau in the treatment of patients with NMIBC in terms of recurrence free survival (RFS) 2 years post-treatment initiation compared to BCG RIVM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The database to be analysed comprised of 967 patients with NMIBC. The primary endpoint was met since BCG Moreau was non-inferior to BCG RIVM in terms of RFS [HR: 0.920 (95%CI: 0.725; 1.168)]. There was no statistically significant difference in all secondary endpoints including time to recurrence, progression-free survival, time to progression, and overall survival. The safety profile of BCG Moreau Polish substrain was consistent with side effects and frequency of complications observed with BCG RIVM and study reports in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BCG Moreau was effective and safe in the treatment of patients with intermediate- or high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. There was no statistically significant difference in treatment outcome between BCG Moreau and BCG RIVM strains based on real-world data.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"196-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term efficacy and safety of intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Moreau Polish substrain in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Wiktor Bursiewicz, Monika Złotkiewicz, Wojciech Krajewski, Krzysztof Tupikowski, Jan Kołodziej, Rolf Jünemann, Tobias Mudra, Stefanie Witecy, Tomasz Szydełko, Anna Kołodziej\",\"doi\":\"10.5173/ceju.2024.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Moreau is under-represented in literature and comparisons with other BCG strains are rare.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective data analysis in patients with intermediate or high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) to assess effectiveness and safety of BCG Moreau Polish substrain to BCG RIVM. The primary objective was to describe the real-world effectiveness of BCG Moreau in the treatment of patients with NMIBC in terms of recurrence free survival (RFS) 2 years post-treatment initiation compared to BCG RIVM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The database to be analysed comprised of 967 patients with NMIBC. The primary endpoint was met since BCG Moreau was non-inferior to BCG RIVM in terms of RFS [HR: 0.920 (95%CI: 0.725; 1.168)]. There was no statistically significant difference in all secondary endpoints including time to recurrence, progression-free survival, time to progression, and overall survival. The safety profile of BCG Moreau Polish substrain was consistent with side effects and frequency of complications observed with BCG RIVM and study reports in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BCG Moreau was effective and safe in the treatment of patients with intermediate- or high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. There was no statistically significant difference in treatment outcome between BCG Moreau and BCG RIVM strains based on real-world data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"77 2\",\"pages\":\"196-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428373/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:莫罗卡介苗(BCG)在文献中的代表性不足,与其他卡介苗菌株的比较也很少见:我们对中危或高危非肌浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者进行了回顾性数据分析,以评估卡介苗莫罗波兰亚种与卡介苗RIVM的有效性和安全性。主要目的是描述卡介苗治疗NMIBC患者的实际效果,即与卡介苗RIVM相比,卡介苗Moreau在治疗开始后2年的无复发生存率(RFS):要分析的数据库包括 967 名 NMIBC 患者。BCG Moreau的RFS不劣于BCG RIVM,因此达到了主要终点[HR:0.920 (95%CI: 0.725; 1.168)]。所有次要终点(包括复发时间、无进展生存期、进展时间和总生存期)的差异均无统计学意义。卡介苗莫罗波兰子菌株的安全性与卡介苗RIVM的副作用和并发症频率以及文献中的研究报告一致:卡介苗莫雷对中高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的治疗有效且安全。根据实际数据,卡介苗莫雷诺菌株和卡介苗RIVM菌株在治疗效果上没有明显的统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term efficacy and safety of intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Moreau Polish substrain in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Introduction: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Moreau is under-represented in literature and comparisons with other BCG strains are rare.

Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective data analysis in patients with intermediate or high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) to assess effectiveness and safety of BCG Moreau Polish substrain to BCG RIVM. The primary objective was to describe the real-world effectiveness of BCG Moreau in the treatment of patients with NMIBC in terms of recurrence free survival (RFS) 2 years post-treatment initiation compared to BCG RIVM.

Results: The database to be analysed comprised of 967 patients with NMIBC. The primary endpoint was met since BCG Moreau was non-inferior to BCG RIVM in terms of RFS [HR: 0.920 (95%CI: 0.725; 1.168)]. There was no statistically significant difference in all secondary endpoints including time to recurrence, progression-free survival, time to progression, and overall survival. The safety profile of BCG Moreau Polish substrain was consistent with side effects and frequency of complications observed with BCG RIVM and study reports in the literature.

Conclusions: BCG Moreau was effective and safe in the treatment of patients with intermediate- or high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. There was no statistically significant difference in treatment outcome between BCG Moreau and BCG RIVM strains based on real-world data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信