包括治疗反应数据在内的 MTX 骨病与骨质疏松症--一项包括 172 名患者的回顾性单中心研究。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1007/s00223-024-01290-5
Felix N von Brackel, Jonathan Grambeck, Florian Barvencik, Michael Amling, Ralf Oheim
{"title":"包括治疗反应数据在内的 MTX 骨病与骨质疏松症--一项包括 172 名患者的回顾性单中心研究。","authors":"Felix N von Brackel, Jonathan Grambeck, Florian Barvencik, Michael Amling, Ralf Oheim","doi":"10.1007/s00223-024-01290-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>MTX is an effective and widely used immunomodulatory drug for rheumatoid diseases. MTX osteopathy is a very rare and specific side effect, characterized by stress fractures at multiple locations in the lower extremity, hampering the patient's mobility by pain and loss of function. In clinical practice, osteoporosis and MTX osteopathy are repeatedly confused and a comparative workup is needed to clarity it's specifics. Furthermore, specific treatment options for MTX osteopathy need to be established. We compared patients suffering from MTX osteopathy to patients with osteoporosis (OPO). Patients underwent an extensive clinical workup including blood sampling, bone mineral density measurements, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography and muscular performance testing. Furthermore, treatment regimes in MTX osteopathy were compared with respect to regain of mobility and pain reduction. 83 patients with MTX osteopathy and 89 with OPO were included. Patients with MTX osteopathy did exhibit fractures predominantly at the lower extremity and pain scores were significantly higher (MTX: 6.75 ± 1.86 vs. OPO: 3.62 ± 2.95, p < 0.0001). MTX-caused mobility restriction was successfully reduced by treatment only if MTX was discontinued (pre-treatment: 2.16 ± 1.19 vs. post-treatment: 1.04 ± 0.87, p < 0.0001). Most mobility gain was achieved by involving anabolic treatment (anabolic: 2.1 ± 1.02 vs. antiresorptive: 1.09 ± 0.94, p < 0.05). In summary, MTX osteopathy is characterized by distinct lower extremity stress fractures leading to severe pain and immobility. Discontinuation of MTX is essential to enable treatment success and involving anabolic treatment seems to be more effectively in mobility regain as antiresorptive treatment alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MTX Osteopathy Versus Osteoporosis Including Response to Treatment Data-A Retrospective Single Center Study Including 172 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Felix N von Brackel, Jonathan Grambeck, Florian Barvencik, Michael Amling, Ralf Oheim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00223-024-01290-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>MTX is an effective and widely used immunomodulatory drug for rheumatoid diseases. MTX osteopathy is a very rare and specific side effect, characterized by stress fractures at multiple locations in the lower extremity, hampering the patient's mobility by pain and loss of function. In clinical practice, osteoporosis and MTX osteopathy are repeatedly confused and a comparative workup is needed to clarity it's specifics. Furthermore, specific treatment options for MTX osteopathy need to be established. We compared patients suffering from MTX osteopathy to patients with osteoporosis (OPO). Patients underwent an extensive clinical workup including blood sampling, bone mineral density measurements, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography and muscular performance testing. Furthermore, treatment regimes in MTX osteopathy were compared with respect to regain of mobility and pain reduction. 83 patients with MTX osteopathy and 89 with OPO were included. Patients with MTX osteopathy did exhibit fractures predominantly at the lower extremity and pain scores were significantly higher (MTX: 6.75 ± 1.86 vs. OPO: 3.62 ± 2.95, p < 0.0001). MTX-caused mobility restriction was successfully reduced by treatment only if MTX was discontinued (pre-treatment: 2.16 ± 1.19 vs. post-treatment: 1.04 ± 0.87, p < 0.0001). Most mobility gain was achieved by involving anabolic treatment (anabolic: 2.1 ± 1.02 vs. antiresorptive: 1.09 ± 0.94, p < 0.05). In summary, MTX osteopathy is characterized by distinct lower extremity stress fractures leading to severe pain and immobility. Discontinuation of MTX is essential to enable treatment success and involving anabolic treatment seems to be more effectively in mobility regain as antiresorptive treatment alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531443/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-024-01290-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-024-01290-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

MTX 是治疗类风湿病的一种有效且广泛使用的免疫调节药物。MTX 骨质疏松症是一种非常罕见且特殊的副作用,主要表现为下肢多处应力性骨折,患者因疼痛和功能丧失而行动不便。在临床实践中,骨质疏松症和 MTX 骨质疏松症经常被混淆,需要进行对比检查以明确其具体情况。此外,还需要确定 MTX 骨病的具体治疗方案。我们将 MTX 骨病患者与骨质疏松症(OPO)患者进行了比较。患者接受了广泛的临床检查,包括血液采样、骨质密度测定、高分辨率外周定量计算机断层扫描和肌肉性能测试。此外,还比较了 MTX 骨病治疗方案在恢复活动能力和减轻疼痛方面的效果。83名患者接受了MTX骨病治疗,89名患者接受了OPO治疗。MTX骨病患者主要表现为下肢骨折,疼痛评分明显更高(MTX:6.75 ± 1.86 vs. OPO:3.62 ± 2.95,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MTX Osteopathy Versus Osteoporosis Including Response to Treatment Data-A Retrospective Single Center Study Including 172 Patients.

MTX is an effective and widely used immunomodulatory drug for rheumatoid diseases. MTX osteopathy is a very rare and specific side effect, characterized by stress fractures at multiple locations in the lower extremity, hampering the patient's mobility by pain and loss of function. In clinical practice, osteoporosis and MTX osteopathy are repeatedly confused and a comparative workup is needed to clarity it's specifics. Furthermore, specific treatment options for MTX osteopathy need to be established. We compared patients suffering from MTX osteopathy to patients with osteoporosis (OPO). Patients underwent an extensive clinical workup including blood sampling, bone mineral density measurements, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography and muscular performance testing. Furthermore, treatment regimes in MTX osteopathy were compared with respect to regain of mobility and pain reduction. 83 patients with MTX osteopathy and 89 with OPO were included. Patients with MTX osteopathy did exhibit fractures predominantly at the lower extremity and pain scores were significantly higher (MTX: 6.75 ± 1.86 vs. OPO: 3.62 ± 2.95, p < 0.0001). MTX-caused mobility restriction was successfully reduced by treatment only if MTX was discontinued (pre-treatment: 2.16 ± 1.19 vs. post-treatment: 1.04 ± 0.87, p < 0.0001). Most mobility gain was achieved by involving anabolic treatment (anabolic: 2.1 ± 1.02 vs. antiresorptive: 1.09 ± 0.94, p < 0.05). In summary, MTX osteopathy is characterized by distinct lower extremity stress fractures leading to severe pain and immobility. Discontinuation of MTX is essential to enable treatment success and involving anabolic treatment seems to be more effectively in mobility regain as antiresorptive treatment alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信