使用消费级腕戴式设备检测久坐时间和时间间隔:一个隐藏的半马尔科夫模型。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Agus Salim, Christian J Brakenridge, Dulari Hakamuwa Lekamlage, Erin Howden, Ruth Grigg, Hayley T Dillon, Howard D Bondell, Julie A Simpson, Genevieve N Healy, Neville Owen, David W Dunstan, Elisabeth A H Winkler
{"title":"使用消费级腕戴式设备检测久坐时间和时间间隔:一个隐藏的半马尔科夫模型。","authors":"Agus Salim, Christian J Brakenridge, Dulari Hakamuwa Lekamlage, Erin Howden, Ruth Grigg, Hayley T Dillon, Howard D Bondell, Julie A Simpson, Genevieve N Healy, Neville Owen, David W Dunstan, Elisabeth A H Winkler","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02311-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wrist-worn data from commercially available devices has potential to characterize sedentary time for research and for clinical and public health applications. We propose a model that utilizes heart rate in addition to step count data to estimate the proportion of time spent being sedentary and the usual length of sedentary bouts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and trained two Hidden semi-Markov models, STEPHEN (STEP and Heart ENcoder) and STEPCODE (STEP enCODEr; a steps-only based model) using consumer-grade Fitbit device data from participants under free living conditions, and validated model performance using two external datasets. We used the median absolute percentage error (MDAPE) to measure the accuracy of the proposed models against research-grade activPAL device data as the referent. Bland-Altman plots summarized the individual-level agreement with activPAL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In OPTIMISE cohort, STEPHEN's estimates of the proportion of time spent sedentary had significantly (p < 0.001) better accuracy (MDAPE [IQR] = 0.15 [0.06-0.25] vs. 0.23 [0.13-0.53)]) and agreement (Bias Mean [SD]=-0.03[0.11] vs. 0.14 [0.11]) than the proprietary software, estimated the usual sedentary bout duration more accurately (MDAPE[IQR] = 0.11[0.06-0.26] vs. 0.42[0.32-0.48]), and had better agreement (Bias Mean [SD] = 3.91[5.67] minutes vs. -11.93[5.07] minutes). With the ALLO-Active dataset, STEPHEN and STEPCODE did not improve the estimation of proportion of time spent sedentary, but STEPHEN estimated usual sedentary bout duration more accurately than the proprietary software (MDAPE[IQR] = 0.19[0.03-0.25] vs. 0.36[0.15-0.48]) and had smaller bias (Bias Mean[SD] = 0.70[8.89] minutes vs. -11.35[9.17] minutes).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STEPHEN can characterize the proportion of time spent being sedentary and usual sedentary bout length. The methodology is available as an open access R package available from https://github.com/limfuxing/stephen/ . The package includes trained models, but users have the flexibility to train their own models.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"24 1","pages":"222"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of sedentary time and bouts using consumer-grade wrist-worn devices: a hidden semi-Markov model.\",\"authors\":\"Agus Salim, Christian J Brakenridge, Dulari Hakamuwa Lekamlage, Erin Howden, Ruth Grigg, Hayley T Dillon, Howard D Bondell, Julie A Simpson, Genevieve N Healy, Neville Owen, David W Dunstan, Elisabeth A H Winkler\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12874-024-02311-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wrist-worn data from commercially available devices has potential to characterize sedentary time for research and for clinical and public health applications. We propose a model that utilizes heart rate in addition to step count data to estimate the proportion of time spent being sedentary and the usual length of sedentary bouts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and trained two Hidden semi-Markov models, STEPHEN (STEP and Heart ENcoder) and STEPCODE (STEP enCODEr; a steps-only based model) using consumer-grade Fitbit device data from participants under free living conditions, and validated model performance using two external datasets. We used the median absolute percentage error (MDAPE) to measure the accuracy of the proposed models against research-grade activPAL device data as the referent. Bland-Altman plots summarized the individual-level agreement with activPAL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In OPTIMISE cohort, STEPHEN's estimates of the proportion of time spent sedentary had significantly (p < 0.001) better accuracy (MDAPE [IQR] = 0.15 [0.06-0.25] vs. 0.23 [0.13-0.53)]) and agreement (Bias Mean [SD]=-0.03[0.11] vs. 0.14 [0.11]) than the proprietary software, estimated the usual sedentary bout duration more accurately (MDAPE[IQR] = 0.11[0.06-0.26] vs. 0.42[0.32-0.48]), and had better agreement (Bias Mean [SD] = 3.91[5.67] minutes vs. -11.93[5.07] minutes). With the ALLO-Active dataset, STEPHEN and STEPCODE did not improve the estimation of proportion of time spent sedentary, but STEPHEN estimated usual sedentary bout duration more accurately than the proprietary software (MDAPE[IQR] = 0.19[0.03-0.25] vs. 0.36[0.15-0.48]) and had smaller bias (Bias Mean[SD] = 0.70[8.89] minutes vs. -11.35[9.17] minutes).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STEPHEN can characterize the proportion of time spent being sedentary and usual sedentary bout length. The methodology is available as an open access R package available from https://github.com/limfuxing/stephen/ . The package includes trained models, but users have the flexibility to train their own models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440759/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02311-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02311-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:来自市售设备的腕戴式数据具有描述久坐时间特征的潜力,可用于研究、临床和公共卫生应用。我们提出了一种除步数数据外还能利用心率来估算久坐时间比例和通常久坐时间长度的模型:我们利用自由生活条件下参与者的消费级 Fitbit 设备数据,开发并训练了两个隐式半马尔科夫模型 STEPHEN(STEP and Heart ENcoder)和 STEPCODE(STEP enCODEr;仅基于步数的模型),并利用两个外部数据集验证了模型的性能。我们使用中位绝对百分比误差(MDAPE)来衡量以研究级 activPAL 设备数据为参照的建议模型的准确性。布兰德-阿尔特曼图总结了与 activPAL 在个体层面上的一致性:结果:在 OPTIMISE 群组中,STEPHEN 对久坐时间比例的估计值显著高于 activPAL 的估计值(p 结论:STEPHEN 可以描述久坐时间比例:STEPHEN 可以描述久坐时间比例和通常的久坐时间长度。该方法是一个开放的 R 软件包,可从 https://github.com/limfuxing/stephen/ 获取。该软件包包括经过训练的模型,但用户也可以灵活地训练自己的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of sedentary time and bouts using consumer-grade wrist-worn devices: a hidden semi-Markov model.

Background: Wrist-worn data from commercially available devices has potential to characterize sedentary time for research and for clinical and public health applications. We propose a model that utilizes heart rate in addition to step count data to estimate the proportion of time spent being sedentary and the usual length of sedentary bouts.

Methods: We developed and trained two Hidden semi-Markov models, STEPHEN (STEP and Heart ENcoder) and STEPCODE (STEP enCODEr; a steps-only based model) using consumer-grade Fitbit device data from participants under free living conditions, and validated model performance using two external datasets. We used the median absolute percentage error (MDAPE) to measure the accuracy of the proposed models against research-grade activPAL device data as the referent. Bland-Altman plots summarized the individual-level agreement with activPAL.

Results: In OPTIMISE cohort, STEPHEN's estimates of the proportion of time spent sedentary had significantly (p < 0.001) better accuracy (MDAPE [IQR] = 0.15 [0.06-0.25] vs. 0.23 [0.13-0.53)]) and agreement (Bias Mean [SD]=-0.03[0.11] vs. 0.14 [0.11]) than the proprietary software, estimated the usual sedentary bout duration more accurately (MDAPE[IQR] = 0.11[0.06-0.26] vs. 0.42[0.32-0.48]), and had better agreement (Bias Mean [SD] = 3.91[5.67] minutes vs. -11.93[5.07] minutes). With the ALLO-Active dataset, STEPHEN and STEPCODE did not improve the estimation of proportion of time spent sedentary, but STEPHEN estimated usual sedentary bout duration more accurately than the proprietary software (MDAPE[IQR] = 0.19[0.03-0.25] vs. 0.36[0.15-0.48]) and had smaller bias (Bias Mean[SD] = 0.70[8.89] minutes vs. -11.35[9.17] minutes).

Conclusions: STEPHEN can characterize the proportion of time spent being sedentary and usual sedentary bout length. The methodology is available as an open access R package available from https://github.com/limfuxing/stephen/ . The package includes trained models, but users have the flexibility to train their own models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信