{"title":"接受伴侣疗法的法布里患者的生化适应性--如何检测、何时检测?","authors":"Malte Lenders, Elise Raphaela Menke, Eva Brand","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00678-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Current recommendations for Fabry disease include α-galactosidase A (AGAL) activity measurements to assess the biochemical response in migalastat-treated patients. Owing to contradictory data from laboratories, we aimed to analyze why AGAL activity measures from dried blood spots (DBS) often fail to detect migalastat-mediated enzymatic activity increases in treated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>43 patients with 58 visits under migalastat were consecutively recruited. Enzymatic AGAL activities were measured from DBS and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Migalastat concentrations in sera were determined using modified serum-mediated inhibition assays to assess C<sub>max</sub> and serum half-life. Results were set in relation to the time of last migalastat intake and blood sampling to assess an optimal timepoint for AGAL activity measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DBS-based AGAL activity measurements of 21 (42.0%) amenable patients were below the limit of detection. Serum samples from migalastat-treated patients showed significant AGAL inhibition, depending on the time between migalastat intake and blood sampling (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.8140, p < 0.0001). Migalastat concentrations were determined in serum samples confirming a C<sub>max</sub> at 3 h and a serum half-life of 4 h. At 24 h after intake, migalastat clearance was significantly associated with renal function (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.3135, p = 0.0102). Enzymatic AGAL activities were higher in samples from DBS and PBMCs 24 h after migalastat intake (both p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The optimal time for enzymatic AGAL activity measurement in migalastat-treated patients appears to be 24 h after the last migalastat intake. Since migalastat is a competitive inhibitor of AGAL, enzymatic AGAL activity measurements should be better performed from PBMCs to reduce migalastat-mediated interferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"845-854"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biochemical Amenability in Fabry Patients Under Chaperone Therapy-How and When to Test?\",\"authors\":\"Malte Lenders, Elise Raphaela Menke, Eva Brand\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40259-024-00678-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Current recommendations for Fabry disease include α-galactosidase A (AGAL) activity measurements to assess the biochemical response in migalastat-treated patients. Owing to contradictory data from laboratories, we aimed to analyze why AGAL activity measures from dried blood spots (DBS) often fail to detect migalastat-mediated enzymatic activity increases in treated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>43 patients with 58 visits under migalastat were consecutively recruited. Enzymatic AGAL activities were measured from DBS and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Migalastat concentrations in sera were determined using modified serum-mediated inhibition assays to assess C<sub>max</sub> and serum half-life. Results were set in relation to the time of last migalastat intake and blood sampling to assess an optimal timepoint for AGAL activity measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DBS-based AGAL activity measurements of 21 (42.0%) amenable patients were below the limit of detection. Serum samples from migalastat-treated patients showed significant AGAL inhibition, depending on the time between migalastat intake and blood sampling (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.8140, p < 0.0001). Migalastat concentrations were determined in serum samples confirming a C<sub>max</sub> at 3 h and a serum half-life of 4 h. At 24 h after intake, migalastat clearance was significantly associated with renal function (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.3135, p = 0.0102). Enzymatic AGAL activities were higher in samples from DBS and PBMCs 24 h after migalastat intake (both p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The optimal time for enzymatic AGAL activity measurement in migalastat-treated patients appears to be 24 h after the last migalastat intake. Since migalastat is a competitive inhibitor of AGAL, enzymatic AGAL activity measurements should be better performed from PBMCs to reduce migalastat-mediated interferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioDrugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"845-854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530494/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioDrugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-024-00678-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioDrugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-024-00678-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biochemical Amenability in Fabry Patients Under Chaperone Therapy-How and When to Test?
Aim: Current recommendations for Fabry disease include α-galactosidase A (AGAL) activity measurements to assess the biochemical response in migalastat-treated patients. Owing to contradictory data from laboratories, we aimed to analyze why AGAL activity measures from dried blood spots (DBS) often fail to detect migalastat-mediated enzymatic activity increases in treated patients.
Methods: 43 patients with 58 visits under migalastat were consecutively recruited. Enzymatic AGAL activities were measured from DBS and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Migalastat concentrations in sera were determined using modified serum-mediated inhibition assays to assess Cmax and serum half-life. Results were set in relation to the time of last migalastat intake and blood sampling to assess an optimal timepoint for AGAL activity measures.
Results: DBS-based AGAL activity measurements of 21 (42.0%) amenable patients were below the limit of detection. Serum samples from migalastat-treated patients showed significant AGAL inhibition, depending on the time between migalastat intake and blood sampling (r2 = 0.8140, p < 0.0001). Migalastat concentrations were determined in serum samples confirming a Cmax at 3 h and a serum half-life of 4 h. At 24 h after intake, migalastat clearance was significantly associated with renal function (r2 = 0.3135, p = 0.0102). Enzymatic AGAL activities were higher in samples from DBS and PBMCs 24 h after migalastat intake (both p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The optimal time for enzymatic AGAL activity measurement in migalastat-treated patients appears to be 24 h after the last migalastat intake. Since migalastat is a competitive inhibitor of AGAL, enzymatic AGAL activity measurements should be better performed from PBMCs to reduce migalastat-mediated interferences.
期刊介绍:
An essential resource for R&D professionals and clinicians with an interest in biologic therapies.
BioDrugs covers the development and therapeutic application of biotechnology-based pharmaceuticals and diagnostic products for the treatment of human disease.
BioDrugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.