评估自动取药柜和机器人配药系统对一家大型医院中心药房的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Alex C Lin, Justin M Gamble, Mina K Gabriel, Tzu-Yen Hong
{"title":"评估自动取药柜和机器人配药系统对一家大型医院中心药房的影响。","authors":"Alex C Lin, Justin M Gamble, Mina K Gabriel, Tzu-Yen Hong","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxae225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Disclaimer: </strong>In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the impact of implementing 2 technologies in succession, the Carousel system and XR2 robot, in a hospital central pharmacy. The study examined the technologies' impact on workload shifted from fully human-involved, labor-intensive filling from shelves to Carousel and/or XR2, prevention of dispensing errors, and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implementation occurred in 3 phases from August 2021 through October 2022. In phase I, medications were manually filled from the shelves for immediate doses and automated dispensing cabinet stock. RobotRx was used for unit-dose (UD) carts. In phase II, the Carousel system was introduced, while RobotRx was used for UD carts. In phase III, the XR2 robot was added and RobotRx was decommissioned. Epic data and time studies were utilized and analyzed with ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 3 phases of implementation, workload shifted away from filling from the shelves, with 2,479, 1,044, and 864 orders filled from the shelves for phase I through phase III, respectively. The Carousel workload was 1,234 orders (phase II) and 348 orders (phase III). Nearly 71% of the workload was shifted to the XR2. The overall prevented error rate did not significantly change from phase I to phase II, remaining at 0.5%. In comparison, the error rate significantly decreased to 0.41% in phase III. Use of the Carousel system resulted in a significant reduction in dispensing errors compared to manual filling from the shelves. Use of the XR2 robot resulted in a dispensing error rate of 0%. The savings in time when using both Carousel and XR2 led to a decrease in full-time equivalents of 0.77 for pharmacists and 1.76 for pharmacy technicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Carousel and/or XR2 significantly shift workload from manual filling to automated technologies, decrease dispensing errors, and improve efficiency, reducing pharmacist and technician workload. Time saved could allow staff to spend more time on patient-centric tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the impact of an automated drug retrieval cabinet and robotic dispensing system in a large hospital central pharmacy.\",\"authors\":\"Alex C Lin, Justin M Gamble, Mina K Gabriel, Tzu-Yen Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajhp/zxae225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Disclaimer: </strong>In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the impact of implementing 2 technologies in succession, the Carousel system and XR2 robot, in a hospital central pharmacy. The study examined the technologies' impact on workload shifted from fully human-involved, labor-intensive filling from shelves to Carousel and/or XR2, prevention of dispensing errors, and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implementation occurred in 3 phases from August 2021 through October 2022. In phase I, medications were manually filled from the shelves for immediate doses and automated dispensing cabinet stock. RobotRx was used for unit-dose (UD) carts. In phase II, the Carousel system was introduced, while RobotRx was used for UD carts. In phase III, the XR2 robot was added and RobotRx was decommissioned. Epic data and time studies were utilized and analyzed with ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 3 phases of implementation, workload shifted away from filling from the shelves, with 2,479, 1,044, and 864 orders filled from the shelves for phase I through phase III, respectively. The Carousel workload was 1,234 orders (phase II) and 348 orders (phase III). Nearly 71% of the workload was shifted to the XR2. The overall prevented error rate did not significantly change from phase I to phase II, remaining at 0.5%. In comparison, the error rate significantly decreased to 0.41% in phase III. Use of the Carousel system resulted in a significant reduction in dispensing errors compared to manual filling from the shelves. Use of the XR2 robot resulted in a dispensing error rate of 0%. The savings in time when using both Carousel and XR2 led to a decrease in full-time equivalents of 0.77 for pharmacists and 1.76 for pharmacy technicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Carousel and/or XR2 significantly shift workload from manual filling to automated technologies, decrease dispensing errors, and improve efficiency, reducing pharmacist and technician workload. Time saved could allow staff to spend more time on patient-centric tasks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae225\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免责声明:为了加快文章的出版速度,AJHP在接受稿件后会尽快在网上发布。被录用的稿件已经过同行评审和校对,但在进行技术格式化和作者校对之前会在网上发布。目的:确定在医院中心药房相继实施 Carousel 系统和 XR2 机器人这两项技术的影响。该研究考察了这两项技术对工作量的影响,即从完全由人工参与的劳动密集型货架灌装工作转移到 Carousel 和/或 XR2,以及对配药错误和效率的影响:方法:从 2021 年 8 月到 2022 年 10 月,分三个阶段实施。在第一阶段,药品由人工从货架上直接灌装,并自动配药柜库存。单位剂量(UD)推车使用的是 RobotRx。在第二阶段,引入了 Carousel 系统,同时将 RobotRx 用于单位剂量配药车。在第三阶段,增加了 XR2 机器人,RobotRx 停止使用。采用了史诗数据和时间研究,并进行了方差分析:在实施的 3 个阶段中,工作量从货架上的填充转移到了货架上的填充,第一阶段到第三阶段从货架上填充的订单分别为 2479、1044 和 864 个。旋转木马的工作量为 1,234 份订单(第二阶段)和 348 份订单(第三阶段)。近 71% 的工作量转移到了 XR2 上。从第一阶段到第二阶段,总体防止错误率没有明显变化,仍为 0.5%。相比之下,第三阶段的错误率大幅下降至 0.41%。与人工从货架上灌装相比,使用旋转木马系统大大减少了分装错误。使用 XR2 机器人后,分装错误率为 0%。使用 Carousel 和 XR2 节省了时间,药剂师的全职当量减少了 0.77,药剂技术员的全职当量减少了 1.76:结论:Carousel 和/或 XR2 将工作量从手工配药大幅转移到自动化技术,减少了配药错误,提高了效率,减轻了药剂师和技术人员的工作量。节省下来的时间可让员工将更多时间用于以病人为中心的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the impact of an automated drug retrieval cabinet and robotic dispensing system in a large hospital central pharmacy.

Disclaimer: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Purpose: To determine the impact of implementing 2 technologies in succession, the Carousel system and XR2 robot, in a hospital central pharmacy. The study examined the technologies' impact on workload shifted from fully human-involved, labor-intensive filling from shelves to Carousel and/or XR2, prevention of dispensing errors, and efficiency.

Methods: Implementation occurred in 3 phases from August 2021 through October 2022. In phase I, medications were manually filled from the shelves for immediate doses and automated dispensing cabinet stock. RobotRx was used for unit-dose (UD) carts. In phase II, the Carousel system was introduced, while RobotRx was used for UD carts. In phase III, the XR2 robot was added and RobotRx was decommissioned. Epic data and time studies were utilized and analyzed with ANOVA.

Results: Over the 3 phases of implementation, workload shifted away from filling from the shelves, with 2,479, 1,044, and 864 orders filled from the shelves for phase I through phase III, respectively. The Carousel workload was 1,234 orders (phase II) and 348 orders (phase III). Nearly 71% of the workload was shifted to the XR2. The overall prevented error rate did not significantly change from phase I to phase II, remaining at 0.5%. In comparison, the error rate significantly decreased to 0.41% in phase III. Use of the Carousel system resulted in a significant reduction in dispensing errors compared to manual filling from the shelves. Use of the XR2 robot resulted in a dispensing error rate of 0%. The savings in time when using both Carousel and XR2 led to a decrease in full-time equivalents of 0.77 for pharmacists and 1.76 for pharmacy technicians.

Conclusion: Carousel and/or XR2 significantly shift workload from manual filling to automated technologies, decrease dispensing errors, and improve efficiency, reducing pharmacist and technician workload. Time saved could allow staff to spend more time on patient-centric tasks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信