关节镜下微骨折与逆行软骨下钻孔治疗距骨软骨损伤的比较

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
U O Kasman, Ö Korkmaz
{"title":"关节镜下微骨折与逆行软骨下钻孔治疗距骨软骨损伤的比较","authors":"U O Kasman, Ö Korkmaz","doi":"10.55095/ACHOT2024/031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>In our study, it was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of microfracture and retrograde subchondral drilling on clinical outcomes in patients who underwent ankle arthroscopy due to osteochondral lesion of medial talus.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Twenty eight patients with osteochondral lesion of talus less than 1.5 cm2 treated with ankle arthroscopy were evaluated retrospectively. Microfracture was performed in 16 patients and retrograde subchondral drilling was performed in 12 patients that there was no loss of integrity in the cartilage layer or cartilage layer is partially preserved during ankle arthroscopy. Postoperative evaluations of the patients were done with Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and results of both group were compared statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean activities of daily living scale was 93.4±3.2 and sportive activity scale was 90.1±5.7 in the retrograde drilling group. In the micro-fracture group, mean activities of daily living scale was 93.8±4.1 and mean sportive activity scale was 88.9±9.5. No significant difference was found as a result of statistical comparisons of both groups results.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It has been determined that the size and preservation of the integrity of talar osteochondral lesions are important factors on clinical results. Results of arthroscopic debridement, microfracture and drilization are not good in lesions larger than 1.5 cm2 and lesions with impaired integrity. In our study, depending on the general literature, osteochondral lesions in talus were less than 1.5 cm2 in patients who underwent arthroscopic micro fracture and retrograde drilling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both microfracture and retrograde subchondral drilling are effective treatment methods with good clinical results for talar osteochondral lesions less than 1,5cm2 . Retrograde subchondral drilling can be an alternative treatment method with the reliability of clinical results in patients with no loss of the integrity of the cartilage layer or cartilage layer is partially preserved.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>talus, osteochondral lesion, microfracture, subchondral drilling.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"91 4","pages":"234-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Arthroscopic Microfracture and Retrograde Subchondral Drilling in the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of Talus.\",\"authors\":\"U O Kasman, Ö Korkmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.55095/ACHOT2024/031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>In our study, it was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of microfracture and retrograde subchondral drilling on clinical outcomes in patients who underwent ankle arthroscopy due to osteochondral lesion of medial talus.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Twenty eight patients with osteochondral lesion of talus less than 1.5 cm2 treated with ankle arthroscopy were evaluated retrospectively. Microfracture was performed in 16 patients and retrograde subchondral drilling was performed in 12 patients that there was no loss of integrity in the cartilage layer or cartilage layer is partially preserved during ankle arthroscopy. Postoperative evaluations of the patients were done with Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and results of both group were compared statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean activities of daily living scale was 93.4±3.2 and sportive activity scale was 90.1±5.7 in the retrograde drilling group. In the micro-fracture group, mean activities of daily living scale was 93.8±4.1 and mean sportive activity scale was 88.9±9.5. No significant difference was found as a result of statistical comparisons of both groups results.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It has been determined that the size and preservation of the integrity of talar osteochondral lesions are important factors on clinical results. Results of arthroscopic debridement, microfracture and drilization are not good in lesions larger than 1.5 cm2 and lesions with impaired integrity. In our study, depending on the general literature, osteochondral lesions in talus were less than 1.5 cm2 in patients who underwent arthroscopic micro fracture and retrograde drilling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both microfracture and retrograde subchondral drilling are effective treatment methods with good clinical results for talar osteochondral lesions less than 1,5cm2 . Retrograde subchondral drilling can be an alternative treatment method with the reliability of clinical results in patients with no loss of the integrity of the cartilage layer or cartilage layer is partially preserved.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>talus, osteochondral lesion, microfracture, subchondral drilling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca\",\"volume\":\"91 4\",\"pages\":\"234-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55095/ACHOT2024/031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/ACHOT2024/031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的我们的研究旨在评估微骨折和逆行软骨下钻对因内侧距骨骨软骨病变而接受踝关节镜手术的患者的临床疗效:回顾性评估了28例接受踝关节镜手术治疗的小于1.5平方厘米的距骨骨软骨病变患者。对 16 例患者进行了显微骨折术,对 12 例患者进行了逆行软骨下钻孔术,这些患者在踝关节镜手术中软骨层没有丧失完整性或软骨层部分保留。术后对患者进行了足踝能力测量(FAAM)评估,并对两组结果进行了统计比较:结果:逆行钻孔组患者的平均日常生活活动量表为(93.4±3.2)分,运动活动量表为(90.1±5.7)分。微骨折组的平均日常生活活动量表为(93.8±4.1)分,平均运动活动量表为(88.9±9.5)分。两组结果经统计学比较无明显差异:讨论:已确定距骨骨软骨病变的大小和完整性是影响临床效果的重要因素。大于 1.5 平方厘米的病变和完整性受损的病变,关节镜清创、微骨折和钻孔术的效果不佳。在我们的研究中,根据一般文献,接受关节镜显微骨折和逆行钻孔术的患者的距骨骨软骨病变小于 1.5 平方厘米:对于小于 1.5 平方厘米的距骨骨软骨损伤,显微骨折和逆行软骨下钻孔都是有效的治疗方法,临床效果良好。对于软骨层完整性未丧失或软骨层部分保留的患者,逆行软骨下钻孔是一种临床效果可靠的替代治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Arthroscopic Microfracture and Retrograde Subchondral Drilling in the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of Talus.

Purpose of the study: In our study, it was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of microfracture and retrograde subchondral drilling on clinical outcomes in patients who underwent ankle arthroscopy due to osteochondral lesion of medial talus.

Material and methods: Twenty eight patients with osteochondral lesion of talus less than 1.5 cm2 treated with ankle arthroscopy were evaluated retrospectively. Microfracture was performed in 16 patients and retrograde subchondral drilling was performed in 12 patients that there was no loss of integrity in the cartilage layer or cartilage layer is partially preserved during ankle arthroscopy. Postoperative evaluations of the patients were done with Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and results of both group were compared statistically.

Results: The mean activities of daily living scale was 93.4±3.2 and sportive activity scale was 90.1±5.7 in the retrograde drilling group. In the micro-fracture group, mean activities of daily living scale was 93.8±4.1 and mean sportive activity scale was 88.9±9.5. No significant difference was found as a result of statistical comparisons of both groups results.

Discussion: It has been determined that the size and preservation of the integrity of talar osteochondral lesions are important factors on clinical results. Results of arthroscopic debridement, microfracture and drilization are not good in lesions larger than 1.5 cm2 and lesions with impaired integrity. In our study, depending on the general literature, osteochondral lesions in talus were less than 1.5 cm2 in patients who underwent arthroscopic micro fracture and retrograde drilling.

Conclusions: Both microfracture and retrograde subchondral drilling are effective treatment methods with good clinical results for talar osteochondral lesions less than 1,5cm2 . Retrograde subchondral drilling can be an alternative treatment method with the reliability of clinical results in patients with no loss of the integrity of the cartilage layer or cartilage layer is partially preserved.

Key words: talus, osteochondral lesion, microfracture, subchondral drilling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信