基础模型、模型验证和应用步骤的 PBBM 考虑因素:研讨会总结报告。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Tycho Heimbach, Flora Musuamba Tshinanu, Kimberly Raines, Luiza Borges, Shinichi Kijima, Maria Malamatari, Rebecca Moody, Shereeni Veerasingham, Paul Seo, David Turner, Lanyan Fang, Cordula Stillhart, Philip Bransford, Xiaojun Ren, Nikunjkumar Patel, David Sperry, Hansong Chen, Amin Rostami-Hodjegan, Viera Lukacova, Duxin Sun, Jean-Flaubert Nguefack, Tessa Carducci, Manuela Grimstein, Xavier Pepin, Masoud Jamei, Konstantinos Stamatopoulos, Min Li, Maitri Sanghavi, Christer Tannergren, Haritha Mandula, Zhuojun Zhao, Tzuchi Rob Ju, Christian Wagner, Sumit Arora, Michael Wang, Gregory Rullo, Amitava Mitra, Sivacharan Kollipara, Siri Kalyan Chirumamilla, James E Polli, Claire Mackie
{"title":"基础模型、模型验证和应用步骤的 PBBM 考虑因素:研讨会总结报告。","authors":"Tycho Heimbach, Flora Musuamba Tshinanu, Kimberly Raines, Luiza Borges, Shinichi Kijima, Maria Malamatari, Rebecca Moody, Shereeni Veerasingham, Paul Seo, David Turner, Lanyan Fang, Cordula Stillhart, Philip Bransford, Xiaojun Ren, Nikunjkumar Patel, David Sperry, Hansong Chen, Amin Rostami-Hodjegan, Viera Lukacova, Duxin Sun, Jean-Flaubert Nguefack, Tessa Carducci, Manuela Grimstein, Xavier Pepin, Masoud Jamei, Konstantinos Stamatopoulos, Min Li, Maitri Sanghavi, Christer Tannergren, Haritha Mandula, Zhuojun Zhao, Tzuchi Rob Ju, Christian Wagner, Sumit Arora, Michael Wang, Gregory Rullo, Amitava Mitra, Sivacharan Kollipara, Siri Kalyan Chirumamilla, James E Polli, Claire Mackie","doi":"10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The proceedings from the 30th August 2023 (Day 2) of the workshop \"Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Models (PBBM) Best Practices for Drug Product Quality: Regulatory and Industry Perspectives\" are provided herein. Day 2 covered PBBM case studies from six regulatory authorities which provided considerations for model verification, validation, and application based on the context of use (COU) of the model. PBBM case studies to define critical material attribute (CMA) specification settings, such as active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) particle size distributions (PSDs) were shared. PBBM case studies to define critical quality attributes (CQAs) such as the dissolution specification setting or to define the bioequivalence safe space were also discussed. Examples of PBBM using the credibility assessment framework, COU and model risk assessment, as well as scientific learnings from PBBM case studies are provided. Breakout session discussions highlighted current trends and barriers to application of PBBMs including: (a) PBBM credibility assessment framework and level of validation, (b) use of disposition parameters in PBBM and points to consider when iv data are not available, (c) conducting virtual bioequivalence trials and dealing with variability, (d) model acceptance criteria, and (e) application of PBBMs for establishing safe space and failure edges.</p>","PeriodicalId":52,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Pharmaceutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PBBM Considerations for Base Models, Model Validation, and Application Steps: Workshop Summary Report.\",\"authors\":\"Tycho Heimbach, Flora Musuamba Tshinanu, Kimberly Raines, Luiza Borges, Shinichi Kijima, Maria Malamatari, Rebecca Moody, Shereeni Veerasingham, Paul Seo, David Turner, Lanyan Fang, Cordula Stillhart, Philip Bransford, Xiaojun Ren, Nikunjkumar Patel, David Sperry, Hansong Chen, Amin Rostami-Hodjegan, Viera Lukacova, Duxin Sun, Jean-Flaubert Nguefack, Tessa Carducci, Manuela Grimstein, Xavier Pepin, Masoud Jamei, Konstantinos Stamatopoulos, Min Li, Maitri Sanghavi, Christer Tannergren, Haritha Mandula, Zhuojun Zhao, Tzuchi Rob Ju, Christian Wagner, Sumit Arora, Michael Wang, Gregory Rullo, Amitava Mitra, Sivacharan Kollipara, Siri Kalyan Chirumamilla, James E Polli, Claire Mackie\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The proceedings from the 30th August 2023 (Day 2) of the workshop \\\"Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Models (PBBM) Best Practices for Drug Product Quality: Regulatory and Industry Perspectives\\\" are provided herein. Day 2 covered PBBM case studies from six regulatory authorities which provided considerations for model verification, validation, and application based on the context of use (COU) of the model. PBBM case studies to define critical material attribute (CMA) specification settings, such as active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) particle size distributions (PSDs) were shared. PBBM case studies to define critical quality attributes (CQAs) such as the dissolution specification setting or to define the bioequivalence safe space were also discussed. Examples of PBBM using the credibility assessment framework, COU and model risk assessment, as well as scientific learnings from PBBM case studies are provided. Breakout session discussions highlighted current trends and barriers to application of PBBMs including: (a) PBBM credibility assessment framework and level of validation, (b) use of disposition parameters in PBBM and points to consider when iv data are not available, (c) conducting virtual bioequivalence trials and dealing with variability, (d) model acceptance criteria, and (e) application of PBBMs for establishing safe space and failure edges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Pharmaceutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Pharmaceutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00758\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023 年 8 月 30 日(第 2 天)"基于生理学的生物药剂学模型 (PBBM) 药物产品质量最佳实践 "研讨会的会议记录:监管和行业视角 "研讨会的会议记录。第二天的内容包括来自六个监管机构的 PBBM 案例研究,根据模型的使用环境 (COU) 提供了模型验证、确认和应用的注意事项。分享了定义关键材料属性 (CMA) 规格设置的 PBBM 案例研究,如活性药物成分 (API) 粒度分布 (PSD)。还讨论了定义关键质量属性 (CQAs) 的 PBBM 案例研究,如溶解度规格设置或定义生物等效性安全空间。还提供了使用可信度评估框架、COU 和模型风险评估进行 PBBM 的实例,以及从 PBBM 案例研究中学到的科学知识。分组讨论强调了应用 PBBM 的当前趋势和障碍,包括:(a) PBBM 可信度评估框架和验证水平,(b) 在 PBBM 中使用处置参数以及在没有 iv 数据时应考虑的要点,(c) 进行虚拟生物等效性试验和处理变异性,(d) 模型验收标准,以及 (e) 应用 PBBM 建立安全空间和失败边缘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PBBM Considerations for Base Models, Model Validation, and Application Steps: Workshop Summary Report.

The proceedings from the 30th August 2023 (Day 2) of the workshop "Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Models (PBBM) Best Practices for Drug Product Quality: Regulatory and Industry Perspectives" are provided herein. Day 2 covered PBBM case studies from six regulatory authorities which provided considerations for model verification, validation, and application based on the context of use (COU) of the model. PBBM case studies to define critical material attribute (CMA) specification settings, such as active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) particle size distributions (PSDs) were shared. PBBM case studies to define critical quality attributes (CQAs) such as the dissolution specification setting or to define the bioequivalence safe space were also discussed. Examples of PBBM using the credibility assessment framework, COU and model risk assessment, as well as scientific learnings from PBBM case studies are provided. Breakout session discussions highlighted current trends and barriers to application of PBBMs including: (a) PBBM credibility assessment framework and level of validation, (b) use of disposition parameters in PBBM and points to consider when iv data are not available, (c) conducting virtual bioequivalence trials and dealing with variability, (d) model acceptance criteria, and (e) application of PBBMs for establishing safe space and failure edges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Molecular Pharmaceutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
391
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Pharmaceutics publishes the results of original research that contributes significantly to the molecular mechanistic understanding of drug delivery and drug delivery systems. The journal encourages contributions describing research at the interface of drug discovery and drug development. Scientific areas within the scope of the journal include physical and pharmaceutical chemistry, biochemistry and biophysics, molecular and cellular biology, and polymer and materials science as they relate to drug and drug delivery system efficacy. Mechanistic Drug Delivery and Drug Targeting research on modulating activity and efficacy of a drug or drug product is within the scope of Molecular Pharmaceutics. Theoretical and experimental peer-reviewed research articles, communications, reviews, and perspectives are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信