Remdesivir 在患有 COVID-19 的实体器官移植受者中的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Zia Navidi, Seyed Hamid Pakzad Moghadam, Mojgan Mohajeri Iravani, Amirhossein Orandi, Amirali Orandi, Samrand Fattah Ghazi, Ehsan Fallah, Ebadallah Shiri Malekabad, Saeed Khorramnia
{"title":"Remdesivir 在患有 COVID-19 的实体器官移植受者中的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Zia Navidi, Seyed Hamid Pakzad Moghadam, Mojgan Mohajeri Iravani, Amirhossein Orandi, Amirali Orandi, Samrand Fattah Ghazi, Ehsan Fallah, Ebadallah Shiri Malekabad, Saeed Khorramnia","doi":"10.4285/ctr.24.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of remdesivir in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been studied. The present systematic review and analysis aimed to assess its effectiveness in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, medRxiv, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify relevant articles published up to April 2024. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane assessment tool. Data analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software ver. 3.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included seven eligible retrospective studies, involving a total of 574 SOTRs. The findings indicated no significant differences in mortality rate (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-2.39), hospitalization rate (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.10-4.79), need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.44-2.18), or need for oxygen therapy (OR, 3.73; 95% CI, 0.75-18.34) between the groups that received remdesivir and those that did not. However, a statistically significant difference was observed in the rate of intensive care unit admissions between the two groups (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.24-4.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analysis found that remdesivir offers no clinical benefits to SOTRs infected with COVID-19. Additional high-quality research is required to assess the potential clinical advantages of remdesivir for SOTRs with COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":519901,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplantation and research","volume":"38 3","pages":"212-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remdesivir in solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zia Navidi, Seyed Hamid Pakzad Moghadam, Mojgan Mohajeri Iravani, Amirhossein Orandi, Amirali Orandi, Samrand Fattah Ghazi, Ehsan Fallah, Ebadallah Shiri Malekabad, Saeed Khorramnia\",\"doi\":\"10.4285/ctr.24.0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of remdesivir in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been studied. The present systematic review and analysis aimed to assess its effectiveness in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, medRxiv, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify relevant articles published up to April 2024. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane assessment tool. Data analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software ver. 3.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included seven eligible retrospective studies, involving a total of 574 SOTRs. The findings indicated no significant differences in mortality rate (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-2.39), hospitalization rate (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.10-4.79), need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.44-2.18), or need for oxygen therapy (OR, 3.73; 95% CI, 0.75-18.34) between the groups that received remdesivir and those that did not. However, a statistically significant difference was observed in the rate of intensive care unit admissions between the two groups (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.24-4.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analysis found that remdesivir offers no clinical benefits to SOTRs infected with COVID-19. Additional high-quality research is required to assess the potential clinical advantages of remdesivir for SOTRs with COVID-19.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical transplantation and research\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"212-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical transplantation and research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4285/ctr.24.0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical transplantation and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4285/ctr.24.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:已对冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)实体器官移植受者(SOTR)使用雷米替韦的情况进行了研究。本系统综述和分析旨在评估雷米替韦在这一人群中的有效性:对PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Embase、medRxiv和Google Scholar进行了全面检索,以确定截至2024年4月发表的相关文章。使用 Cochrane 评估工具对纳入研究的质量进行了评估。数据分析采用 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 软件 ver.3.0 版进行数据分析:荟萃分析包括七项符合条件的回顾性研究,共涉及 574 例 SOTR。研究结果表明,接受雷米替韦治疗组和未接受雷米替韦治疗组在死亡率(比值比 [OR],1.19;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.59-2.39)、住院率(OR,0.69;95% CI,0.10-4.79)、机械通气需求(OR,0.98;95% CI,0.44-2.18)或氧疗需求(OR,3.73;95% CI,0.75-18.34)方面无明显差异。然而,在两组患者入住重症监护室的比例上却发现了统计学上的显著差异(OR,2.39;95% CI,1.24-4.57):我们的荟萃分析发现,雷米地韦对感染COVID-19的SOTR患者没有临床益处。需要进行更多高质量的研究,以评估雷米替韦对感染 COVID-19 的 SOTR 的潜在临床优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remdesivir in solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The use of remdesivir in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been studied. The present systematic review and analysis aimed to assess its effectiveness in this population.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, medRxiv, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify relevant articles published up to April 2024. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane assessment tool. Data analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software ver. 3.0.

Results: The meta-analysis included seven eligible retrospective studies, involving a total of 574 SOTRs. The findings indicated no significant differences in mortality rate (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-2.39), hospitalization rate (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.10-4.79), need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.44-2.18), or need for oxygen therapy (OR, 3.73; 95% CI, 0.75-18.34) between the groups that received remdesivir and those that did not. However, a statistically significant difference was observed in the rate of intensive care unit admissions between the two groups (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.24-4.57).

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis found that remdesivir offers no clinical benefits to SOTRs infected with COVID-19. Additional high-quality research is required to assess the potential clinical advantages of remdesivir for SOTRs with COVID-19.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信