整合姑息关怀和心力衰竭:PalliatHeartSynthesis 现实主义综合疗法。

Tracey McConnell, Carolyn Blair, Geoff Wong, Claire Duddy, Clare Howie, Loreena Hill, Joanne Reid
{"title":"整合姑息关怀和心力衰竭:PalliatHeartSynthesis 现实主义综合疗法。","authors":"Tracey McConnell, Carolyn Blair, Geoff Wong, Claire Duddy, Clare Howie, Loreena Hill, Joanne Reid","doi":"10.3310/FTRG5628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death worldwide, highlighting the need for studies to determine options for palliative care within the management of patients with heart failure. Although there are promising examples of integrated palliative care and heart failure interventions, there is heterogeneity in terms of countries, healthcare settings, multidisciplinary team delivery, modes of delivery and intervention components. Hence, this review is vital to identify what works, for whom and in what circumstances when integrating palliative care and heart failure.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To (1) develop a programme theory of why, for whom and in what contexts desired outcomes occur; and (2) use the programme theory to co-produce with stakeholders key implications to inform best practice and future research.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A realist review of the literature underpinned by the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards quality and reporting standards.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Searches of bibliographic databases were conducted in November 2021 using the following databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, AMED, HMIC and CINAHL. Further relevant documents were identified via alerts and the stakeholder group.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Realist review is a theory-orientated and explanatory approach to the synthesis of evidence. A realist synthesis was used to synthesise the evidence as successful implementation of integrated palliative care and heart failure depends on the context and people involved. The realist synthesis followed Pawson's five iterative stages: (1) locating existing theories; (2) searching for evidence; (3) document selection; (4) extracting and organising data; and (5) synthesising the evidence and drawing conclusions. We recruited an international stakeholder group (<i>n</i> = 32), including National Health Service management, healthcare professionals involved in the delivery of palliative care and heart failure, policy and community groups, plus members of the public and patients, to advise and give us feedback throughout the project, along with Health Education England to disseminate findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1768 documents were identified, of which 1076 met the inclusion criteria. This was narrowed down to 130 included documents based on the programme theory and discussions with stakeholders. Our realist analysis developed and refined 6 overarching context-mechanism-outcome configurations and 30 sub context-mechanism-outcome configurations. The realist synthesis of the literature and stakeholder feedback helped uncover key intervention strategies most likely to support integration of palliative care into heart failure management. These included protected time for evidence-based palliative care education and choice of educational setting (e.g. online, face to face or hybrid), and the importance of increased awareness of the benefits of palliative care as key intervention strategies, the emotive and intellectual need for integrating palliative care and heart failure via credible champions, seeing direct patient benefit, and prioritising palliative care and heart failure guidelines in practice. The implications of our findings are further outlined in the capability, opportunity, motivation, behaviour model.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The realist approach to analysis means that findings are based on our interpretation of the data.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Future work should use the implications to initiate and optimise palliative care in heart failure management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ongoing refinement of the programme theory at each stakeholder meeting allowed us to co-produce implications. These implications outline the required steps to ensure the core components and determinants of behaviour are in place so that all key players have the capacity, opportunity and motivation to integrate palliative care into heart failure management.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42021240185.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131800) and is published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 12, No. 34. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"12 34","pages":"1-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Palliative Care and Heart Failure: the PalliatHeartSynthesis realist synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Tracey McConnell, Carolyn Blair, Geoff Wong, Claire Duddy, Clare Howie, Loreena Hill, Joanne Reid\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/FTRG5628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death worldwide, highlighting the need for studies to determine options for palliative care within the management of patients with heart failure. Although there are promising examples of integrated palliative care and heart failure interventions, there is heterogeneity in terms of countries, healthcare settings, multidisciplinary team delivery, modes of delivery and intervention components. Hence, this review is vital to identify what works, for whom and in what circumstances when integrating palliative care and heart failure.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To (1) develop a programme theory of why, for whom and in what contexts desired outcomes occur; and (2) use the programme theory to co-produce with stakeholders key implications to inform best practice and future research.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A realist review of the literature underpinned by the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards quality and reporting standards.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Searches of bibliographic databases were conducted in November 2021 using the following databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, AMED, HMIC and CINAHL. Further relevant documents were identified via alerts and the stakeholder group.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Realist review is a theory-orientated and explanatory approach to the synthesis of evidence. A realist synthesis was used to synthesise the evidence as successful implementation of integrated palliative care and heart failure depends on the context and people involved. The realist synthesis followed Pawson's five iterative stages: (1) locating existing theories; (2) searching for evidence; (3) document selection; (4) extracting and organising data; and (5) synthesising the evidence and drawing conclusions. We recruited an international stakeholder group (<i>n</i> = 32), including National Health Service management, healthcare professionals involved in the delivery of palliative care and heart failure, policy and community groups, plus members of the public and patients, to advise and give us feedback throughout the project, along with Health Education England to disseminate findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1768 documents were identified, of which 1076 met the inclusion criteria. This was narrowed down to 130 included documents based on the programme theory and discussions with stakeholders. Our realist analysis developed and refined 6 overarching context-mechanism-outcome configurations and 30 sub context-mechanism-outcome configurations. The realist synthesis of the literature and stakeholder feedback helped uncover key intervention strategies most likely to support integration of palliative care into heart failure management. These included protected time for evidence-based palliative care education and choice of educational setting (e.g. online, face to face or hybrid), and the importance of increased awareness of the benefits of palliative care as key intervention strategies, the emotive and intellectual need for integrating palliative care and heart failure via credible champions, seeing direct patient benefit, and prioritising palliative care and heart failure guidelines in practice. The implications of our findings are further outlined in the capability, opportunity, motivation, behaviour model.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The realist approach to analysis means that findings are based on our interpretation of the data.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Future work should use the implications to initiate and optimise palliative care in heart failure management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ongoing refinement of the programme theory at each stakeholder meeting allowed us to co-produce implications. These implications outline the required steps to ensure the core components and determinants of behaviour are in place so that all key players have the capacity, opportunity and motivation to integrate palliative care into heart failure management.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42021240185.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131800) and is published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 12, No. 34. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and social care delivery research\",\"volume\":\"12 34\",\"pages\":\"1-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and social care delivery research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/FTRG5628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/FTRG5628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心血管疾病是全球最常见的死亡原因,因此有必要开展研究,以确定在心衰患者管理过程中的姑息关怀方案。虽然姑息关怀和心力衰竭综合干预的实例很有前景,但在国家、医疗环境、多学科团队的实施、实施模式和干预内容等方面存在差异。因此,本综述对于确定在整合姑息关怀和心力衰竭时,哪些措施有效、对谁有效以及在什么情况下有效至关重要:目的:(1) 建立一个方案理论,说明为什么、对谁以及在什么情况下会产生预期结果;(2) 利用该方案理论与利益相关者共同产生关键影响,为最佳实践和未来研究提供信息:设计:以现实主义和元叙事证据综述为基础,对文献进行现实主义审查:数据来源:数据来源:2021 年 11 月使用以下数据库对文献数据库进行了检索:EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsycInfo、AMED、HMIC 和 CINAHL。通过警报和利益相关者小组确定了更多相关文件:现实主义综述是一种以理论为导向、解释性的证据综合方法。由于综合姑息关怀和心力衰竭的成功实施取决于环境和相关人员,因此采用了现实主义综合法对证据进行综合。现实主义综合法遵循了 Pawson 的五个迭代阶段:(1) 寻找现有理论;(2) 搜索证据;(3) 文件选择;(4) 提取和组织数据;(5) 综合证据并得出结论。我们招募了一个国际利益相关者小组(n = 32),包括国家卫生服务管理部门、参与提供姑息关怀和心力衰竭服务的医护人员、政策和社区团体,以及公众和患者,在整个项目过程中为我们提供建议和反馈,并与英格兰卫生教育部门一起传播研究结果:总共确定了 1768 份文件,其中 1076 份符合纳入标准。根据计划理论以及与利益相关者的讨论,我们将收录范围缩小到 130 份文件。我们的现实主义分析发展并完善了 6 个总体背景-机制-成果组合和 30 个次级背景-机制-成果组合。对文献和利益相关者反馈的现实主义综合分析有助于发现最有可能支持将姑息关怀纳入心衰管理的关键干预策略。这些策略包括:为基于证据的姑息关怀教育和教育环境选择(如在线、面对面或混合式)提供保护时间;提高对姑息关怀益处的认识作为关键干预策略的重要性;通过可信的拥护者将姑息关怀与心力衰竭相结合的情感和知识需求;看到患者的直接获益;在实践中优先考虑姑息关怀和心力衰竭指南。能力、机会、动机、行为模型进一步概述了我们研究结果的意义:局限性:现实主义分析方法意味着研究结果是基于我们对数据的解释:未来的工作:未来的工作应利用这些影响来启动和优化心衰管理中的姑息治疗:在每次利益相关者会议上对方案理论的不断完善使我们能够共同产生影响。这些影响概述了确保核心要素和行为决定因素到位所需的步骤,从而使所有关键参与者都有能力、机会和动力将姑息关怀纳入心衰管理:本研究注册号为 PROSPERO CRD42021240185:该奖项由英国国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)的健康与社会护理服务研究项目(NIHR奖项编号:NIHR131800)资助,全文发表于《健康与社会护理服务研究》第12卷第34期。更多奖项信息,请参阅 NIHR Funding and Awards 网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating Palliative Care and Heart Failure: the PalliatHeartSynthesis realist synthesis.

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death worldwide, highlighting the need for studies to determine options for palliative care within the management of patients with heart failure. Although there are promising examples of integrated palliative care and heart failure interventions, there is heterogeneity in terms of countries, healthcare settings, multidisciplinary team delivery, modes of delivery and intervention components. Hence, this review is vital to identify what works, for whom and in what circumstances when integrating palliative care and heart failure.

Objectives: To (1) develop a programme theory of why, for whom and in what contexts desired outcomes occur; and (2) use the programme theory to co-produce with stakeholders key implications to inform best practice and future research.

Design: A realist review of the literature underpinned by the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards quality and reporting standards.

Data sources: Searches of bibliographic databases were conducted in November 2021 using the following databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, AMED, HMIC and CINAHL. Further relevant documents were identified via alerts and the stakeholder group.

Review methods: Realist review is a theory-orientated and explanatory approach to the synthesis of evidence. A realist synthesis was used to synthesise the evidence as successful implementation of integrated palliative care and heart failure depends on the context and people involved. The realist synthesis followed Pawson's five iterative stages: (1) locating existing theories; (2) searching for evidence; (3) document selection; (4) extracting and organising data; and (5) synthesising the evidence and drawing conclusions. We recruited an international stakeholder group (n = 32), including National Health Service management, healthcare professionals involved in the delivery of palliative care and heart failure, policy and community groups, plus members of the public and patients, to advise and give us feedback throughout the project, along with Health Education England to disseminate findings.

Results: In total, 1768 documents were identified, of which 1076 met the inclusion criteria. This was narrowed down to 130 included documents based on the programme theory and discussions with stakeholders. Our realist analysis developed and refined 6 overarching context-mechanism-outcome configurations and 30 sub context-mechanism-outcome configurations. The realist synthesis of the literature and stakeholder feedback helped uncover key intervention strategies most likely to support integration of palliative care into heart failure management. These included protected time for evidence-based palliative care education and choice of educational setting (e.g. online, face to face or hybrid), and the importance of increased awareness of the benefits of palliative care as key intervention strategies, the emotive and intellectual need for integrating palliative care and heart failure via credible champions, seeing direct patient benefit, and prioritising palliative care and heart failure guidelines in practice. The implications of our findings are further outlined in the capability, opportunity, motivation, behaviour model.

Limitations: The realist approach to analysis means that findings are based on our interpretation of the data.

Future work: Future work should use the implications to initiate and optimise palliative care in heart failure management.

Conclusion: Ongoing refinement of the programme theory at each stakeholder meeting allowed us to co-produce implications. These implications outline the required steps to ensure the core components and determinants of behaviour are in place so that all key players have the capacity, opportunity and motivation to integrate palliative care into heart failure management.

Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42021240185.

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131800) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 34. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信