William Miller, Jacob Braaten, Anna Rauzi, Jillian Wothe, Kristiana Sather, Angela Phillips, Danika Evans, Ramiro Saavedra-Romero, Matthew Prekker, Melissa E Brunsvold
{"title":"静脉体外膜氧合过程中持续抗凝与间断抗凝的血栓栓塞并发症:一项多中心研究。","authors":"William Miller, Jacob Braaten, Anna Rauzi, Jillian Wothe, Kristiana Sather, Angela Phillips, Danika Evans, Ramiro Saavedra-Romero, Matthew Prekker, Melissa E Brunsvold","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Continuous, therapeutic anticoagulation is the standard of care for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The risks of hemorrhage exacerbated by anticoagulation must be weighed with the thrombotic risks associated with ECMO. We hypothesized increased thrombotic events in patients who had interrupted (vs. continuous) anticoagulation during venovenous ECMO.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a retrospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Enrollment of individuals took place at three adult ECMO centers in Minnesota from 2013 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>This study consists of 346 patients supported with venovenous ECMO.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Anticoagulation administration was collected from electronic health records, including frequency and duration of anticoagulation interruptions (IAs) and timing and type of thrombotic events, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A total of 156 patients had IA during their ECMO run and 190 had continuous anticoagulation. Risk adjusted logistic regression demonstrated that individuals in the IA group were not statistically more likely to experience a thrombotic complication (odds ratio [OR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.27-1.70) or require ECMO circuit change (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.52-3.49). Subgroup analysis demonstrated greater frequency of overall thrombotic events with increasing frequency and duration of anticoagulation being interrupted (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our multicenter analysis found a similar frequency of thrombotic events in patients on ECMO when anticoagulation was interrupted vs. administered continuously. Further investigation into the impact of the frequency and duration of these interruptions is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"6 10","pages":"e1155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thromboembolic Complications in Continuous Versus Interrupted Anticoagulation During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"William Miller, Jacob Braaten, Anna Rauzi, Jillian Wothe, Kristiana Sather, Angela Phillips, Danika Evans, Ramiro Saavedra-Romero, Matthew Prekker, Melissa E Brunsvold\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Continuous, therapeutic anticoagulation is the standard of care for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The risks of hemorrhage exacerbated by anticoagulation must be weighed with the thrombotic risks associated with ECMO. We hypothesized increased thrombotic events in patients who had interrupted (vs. continuous) anticoagulation during venovenous ECMO.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a retrospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Enrollment of individuals took place at three adult ECMO centers in Minnesota from 2013 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>This study consists of 346 patients supported with venovenous ECMO.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Anticoagulation administration was collected from electronic health records, including frequency and duration of anticoagulation interruptions (IAs) and timing and type of thrombotic events, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A total of 156 patients had IA during their ECMO run and 190 had continuous anticoagulation. Risk adjusted logistic regression demonstrated that individuals in the IA group were not statistically more likely to experience a thrombotic complication (odds ratio [OR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.27-1.70) or require ECMO circuit change (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.52-3.49). Subgroup analysis demonstrated greater frequency of overall thrombotic events with increasing frequency and duration of anticoagulation being interrupted (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our multicenter analysis found a similar frequency of thrombotic events in patients on ECMO when anticoagulation was interrupted vs. administered continuously. Further investigation into the impact of the frequency and duration of these interruptions is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"6 10\",\"pages\":\"e1155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427029/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thromboembolic Complications in Continuous Versus Interrupted Anticoagulation During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Multicenter Study.
Objectives: Continuous, therapeutic anticoagulation is the standard of care for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The risks of hemorrhage exacerbated by anticoagulation must be weighed with the thrombotic risks associated with ECMO. We hypothesized increased thrombotic events in patients who had interrupted (vs. continuous) anticoagulation during venovenous ECMO.
Design: This is a retrospective, observational study.
Setting: Enrollment of individuals took place at three adult ECMO centers in Minnesota from 2013 to 2022.
Patients: This study consists of 346 patients supported with venovenous ECMO.
Interventions: Anticoagulation administration was collected from electronic health records, including frequency and duration of anticoagulation interruptions (IAs) and timing and type of thrombotic events, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Measurements and main results: A total of 156 patients had IA during their ECMO run and 190 had continuous anticoagulation. Risk adjusted logistic regression demonstrated that individuals in the IA group were not statistically more likely to experience a thrombotic complication (odds ratio [OR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.27-1.70) or require ECMO circuit change (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.52-3.49). Subgroup analysis demonstrated greater frequency of overall thrombotic events with increasing frequency and duration of anticoagulation being interrupted (p = 0.001).
Conclusions: Our multicenter analysis found a similar frequency of thrombotic events in patients on ECMO when anticoagulation was interrupted vs. administered continuously. Further investigation into the impact of the frequency and duration of these interruptions is warranted.