精神分裂症患者代入感的层次分析:运动控制、控制检测和自我归因。

IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Hiroki Oi, Wen Wen, Acer Yu-Chan Chang, Hiroyuki Uchida, Takaki Maeda
{"title":"精神分裂症患者代入感的层次分析:运动控制、控制检测和自我归因。","authors":"Hiroki Oi, Wen Wen, Acer Yu-Chan Chang, Hiroyuki Uchida, Takaki Maeda","doi":"10.1038/s41537-024-00512-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The sense of agency refers to the feeling of initiating and controlling one's actions and their resulting effects on the external environment. Previous studies have uncovered behavioral evidence of excessive self-attribution and, conversely, a reduction in the sense of agency in patients with schizophrenia. We hypothesize that this apparent paradox is likely to result from impairment in lower-level processes underlying the sense of agency, combined with a higher-level compensational bias. The present study employed three behavioral tasks utilizing the same stimuli and experimental design to systematically evaluate multiple factors that influence the sense of agency, including motor control, sensorimotor processing, and self-attribution. Participants' real-time mouse movements were combined with prerecorded motions of others in ratios of 30/70, 55/45, or 80/20, with an additional angular bias of either 0° or 90°. Twenty-six patients with schizophrenia and 27 health control volunteers participated in the three tasks. Patients with schizophrenia performed significantly worse in the reaching and control detection tasks than healthy controls. However, their self-attribution in the control judgment task was comparable to that of the healthy controls. Patients with schizophrenia were impaired in motor control components and in the detection of control using sensorimotor information, but their evaluation of agency remained relatively less affected. This underscores the importance of distinguishing between different subcomponents when addressing the abnormal sense of agency in patients with schizophrenia. Subsequent cluster analysis revealed that the combined task performance accurately distinguished between the patients and healthy control participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":74758,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":"10 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hierarchical analysis of the sense of agency in schizophrenia: motor control, control detection, and self-attribution.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Oi, Wen Wen, Acer Yu-Chan Chang, Hiroyuki Uchida, Takaki Maeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41537-024-00512-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The sense of agency refers to the feeling of initiating and controlling one's actions and their resulting effects on the external environment. Previous studies have uncovered behavioral evidence of excessive self-attribution and, conversely, a reduction in the sense of agency in patients with schizophrenia. We hypothesize that this apparent paradox is likely to result from impairment in lower-level processes underlying the sense of agency, combined with a higher-level compensational bias. The present study employed three behavioral tasks utilizing the same stimuli and experimental design to systematically evaluate multiple factors that influence the sense of agency, including motor control, sensorimotor processing, and self-attribution. Participants' real-time mouse movements were combined with prerecorded motions of others in ratios of 30/70, 55/45, or 80/20, with an additional angular bias of either 0° or 90°. Twenty-six patients with schizophrenia and 27 health control volunteers participated in the three tasks. Patients with schizophrenia performed significantly worse in the reaching and control detection tasks than healthy controls. However, their self-attribution in the control judgment task was comparable to that of the healthy controls. Patients with schizophrenia were impaired in motor control components and in the detection of control using sensorimotor information, but their evaluation of agency remained relatively less affected. This underscores the importance of distinguishing between different subcomponents when addressing the abnormal sense of agency in patients with schizophrenia. Subsequent cluster analysis revealed that the combined task performance accurately distinguished between the patients and healthy control participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439912/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-024-00512-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-024-00512-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

代入感是指发起和控制自己的行为及其对外部环境产生的影响的感觉。以往的研究发现,精神分裂症患者有过度自我归因的行为证据,反之,他们的代入感会降低。我们假设,这种明显的悖论可能是由于代理感的低层次过程受损,再加上高层次的补偿偏差造成的。本研究采用了三种行为任务,利用相同的刺激和实验设计来系统评估影响代理感的多种因素,包括运动控制、感觉运动处理和自我归因。参与者的实时鼠标运动与预先录制的他人运动以 30/70、55/45 或 80/20 的比例结合在一起,并附加 0° 或 90° 的角度偏差。26 名精神分裂症患者和 27 名健康对照志愿者参加了这三项任务。与健康对照组相比,精神分裂症患者在伸手和对照检测任务中的表现明显较差。然而,他们在控制判断任务中的自我归因却与健康对照组相当。精神分裂症患者在运动控制部分和使用感觉运动信息检测控制方面受到了损害,但他们对代理的评估受到的影响相对较小。这强调了在处理精神分裂症患者的异常代理感时区分不同子成分的重要性。随后的聚类分析显示,综合任务表现能准确地区分患者和健康对照组参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hierarchical analysis of the sense of agency in schizophrenia: motor control, control detection, and self-attribution.

The sense of agency refers to the feeling of initiating and controlling one's actions and their resulting effects on the external environment. Previous studies have uncovered behavioral evidence of excessive self-attribution and, conversely, a reduction in the sense of agency in patients with schizophrenia. We hypothesize that this apparent paradox is likely to result from impairment in lower-level processes underlying the sense of agency, combined with a higher-level compensational bias. The present study employed three behavioral tasks utilizing the same stimuli and experimental design to systematically evaluate multiple factors that influence the sense of agency, including motor control, sensorimotor processing, and self-attribution. Participants' real-time mouse movements were combined with prerecorded motions of others in ratios of 30/70, 55/45, or 80/20, with an additional angular bias of either 0° or 90°. Twenty-six patients with schizophrenia and 27 health control volunteers participated in the three tasks. Patients with schizophrenia performed significantly worse in the reaching and control detection tasks than healthy controls. However, their self-attribution in the control judgment task was comparable to that of the healthy controls. Patients with schizophrenia were impaired in motor control components and in the detection of control using sensorimotor information, but their evaluation of agency remained relatively less affected. This underscores the importance of distinguishing between different subcomponents when addressing the abnormal sense of agency in patients with schizophrenia. Subsequent cluster analysis revealed that the combined task performance accurately distinguished between the patients and healthy control participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信