多学科小组评估后对 19 岁后合并症患者的随访:试点研究。

Alexander Wigge, Johanna Philipson, Solveig Hällgren, Helena Filipsson, Britt-Marie Stålnacke
{"title":"多学科小组评估后对 19 岁后合并症患者的随访:试点研究。","authors":"Alexander Wigge, Johanna Philipson, Solveig Hällgren, Helena Filipsson, Britt-Marie Stålnacke","doi":"10.2340/jrm-cc.v7.24581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To follow up patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) 6 months after a multidisciplinary team assessment in specialist care regarding symptoms of pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue and cognition, level of activity, physical activity and sick leave.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective pilot study conducted in a clinical setting of patients (<i>n</i> = 22) with PCC referred from primary healthcare to a specialist clinic for a 2 day-multidisciplinary team assessment followed by a subsequent rehabilitation plan. Data were collected through questionnaires filled in prior to the team assessment and 6 months later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen of the initial 22 patients participated in the follow-up. No statistically significant improvements were seen in any of the questionnaires after 6 months. However, 76.9% of the participants perceived the intervention as being helpful. This differed between the genders, where all the women 100% (<i>n</i> = 8) perceived it as being helpful, compared with 40% (<i>n</i> = 2) of the men (<i>p</i> = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on these findings, the benefit of a multidisciplinary team assessment of PCC is not fully convincing. However, since the participants themselves perceived the intervention as being helpful, the team assessment seems to be of some value. Further studies with larger populations would be of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":73929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH POST COVID-19 CONDITION AFTER A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM ASSESSMENT: A PILOT STUDY.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Wigge, Johanna Philipson, Solveig Hällgren, Helena Filipsson, Britt-Marie Stålnacke\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/jrm-cc.v7.24581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To follow up patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) 6 months after a multidisciplinary team assessment in specialist care regarding symptoms of pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue and cognition, level of activity, physical activity and sick leave.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective pilot study conducted in a clinical setting of patients (<i>n</i> = 22) with PCC referred from primary healthcare to a specialist clinic for a 2 day-multidisciplinary team assessment followed by a subsequent rehabilitation plan. Data were collected through questionnaires filled in prior to the team assessment and 6 months later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen of the initial 22 patients participated in the follow-up. No statistically significant improvements were seen in any of the questionnaires after 6 months. However, 76.9% of the participants perceived the intervention as being helpful. This differed between the genders, where all the women 100% (<i>n</i> = 8) perceived it as being helpful, compared with 40% (<i>n</i> = 2) of the men (<i>p</i> = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on these findings, the benefit of a multidisciplinary team assessment of PCC is not fully convincing. However, since the participants themselves perceived the intervention as being helpful, the team assessment seems to be of some value. Further studies with larger populations would be of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439759/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm-cc.v7.24581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm-cc.v7.24581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在专科医疗机构接受多学科团队评估6个月后,对COVID-19后病情(PCC)患者的疼痛症状、焦虑、抑郁、疲劳和认知、活动水平、体力活动和病假进行随访:一项前瞻性试点研究在临床环境中进行,研究对象是由基层医疗机构转诊至专科诊所接受为期 2 天的多学科团队评估并随后制定康复计划的 PCC 患者(22 人)。数据通过团队评估前和 6 个月后填写的调查问卷收集:结果:最初的 22 名患者中有 15 人参加了随访。6 个月后,所有问卷调查结果均未发现明显改善。不过,76.9% 的参与者认为干预措施有帮助。这在性别上有所不同,所有女性 100%(n = 8)认为干预有帮助,而男性只有 40%(n = 2)认为干预有帮助(p = 0.012):根据这些研究结果,多学科团队评估 PCC 的益处并不完全令人信服。然而,由于参与者自己认为干预是有帮助的,因此团队评估似乎具有一定的价值。我们有兴趣对更多人群进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH POST COVID-19 CONDITION AFTER A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM ASSESSMENT: A PILOT STUDY.

Objective: To follow up patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) 6 months after a multidisciplinary team assessment in specialist care regarding symptoms of pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue and cognition, level of activity, physical activity and sick leave.

Methods: A prospective pilot study conducted in a clinical setting of patients (n = 22) with PCC referred from primary healthcare to a specialist clinic for a 2 day-multidisciplinary team assessment followed by a subsequent rehabilitation plan. Data were collected through questionnaires filled in prior to the team assessment and 6 months later.

Results: Fifteen of the initial 22 patients participated in the follow-up. No statistically significant improvements were seen in any of the questionnaires after 6 months. However, 76.9% of the participants perceived the intervention as being helpful. This differed between the genders, where all the women 100% (n = 8) perceived it as being helpful, compared with 40% (n = 2) of the men (p = 0.012).

Conclusions: Based on these findings, the benefit of a multidisciplinary team assessment of PCC is not fully convincing. However, since the participants themselves perceived the intervention as being helpful, the team assessment seems to be of some value. Further studies with larger populations would be of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信