儿童福利机构实施变革的组织准备度(ORIC)心理计量分析。

Julie A Steen, Chris Stewart
{"title":"儿童福利机构实施变革的组织准备度(ORIC)心理计量分析。","authors":"Julie A Steen, Chris Stewart","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2024.2409092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study consisted of a psychometric analysis of the brief and expanded versions of the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) to assess the scale's validity and reliability in a child welfare setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Based on responses from a sample of 313 child welfare professionals, factorial structure was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was assessed through correlations with theoretically linked concepts, and internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factor analysis yielded a unidimensional structure for the brief version and a two-factor structure for the expanded version. However, the models did not meet the standards for sufficient fit, as evidenced by the fit indices. Both the brief and expanded versions were significantly and positively correlated with theoretically linked concepts. Internal consistency of the brief (α = .96) and expanded versions (α = .96) was excellent.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Though the measure holds promise with respect to construct validity and internal consistency, further testing of the factorial structure in a variety of child welfare samples is warranted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the field of child welfare with information regarding one possible measure of organizational readiness, an important concept in implementation science.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"704-719"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Psychometric Analysis of the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) in a Child Welfare Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Julie A Steen, Chris Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26408066.2024.2409092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study consisted of a psychometric analysis of the brief and expanded versions of the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) to assess the scale's validity and reliability in a child welfare setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Based on responses from a sample of 313 child welfare professionals, factorial structure was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was assessed through correlations with theoretically linked concepts, and internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factor analysis yielded a unidimensional structure for the brief version and a two-factor structure for the expanded version. However, the models did not meet the standards for sufficient fit, as evidenced by the fit indices. Both the brief and expanded versions were significantly and positively correlated with theoretically linked concepts. Internal consistency of the brief (α = .96) and expanded versions (α = .96) was excellent.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Though the measure holds promise with respect to construct validity and internal consistency, further testing of the factorial structure in a variety of child welfare samples is warranted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the field of child welfare with information regarding one possible measure of organizational readiness, an important concept in implementation science.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"704-719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2024.2409092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2024.2409092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究包括对组织实施变革准备度量表(ORIC)的简明版和扩展版进行心理测量分析,以评估该量表在儿童福利环境中的有效性和可靠性:方法:根据 313 名儿童福利专业人员的样本回答,通过探索性和确认性因子分析对因子结构进行了评估。通过与理论相关概念的相关性评估了结构效度,并通过 Cronbach's alpha 评估了内部一致性:因子分析得出简明版的单维结构和扩展版的双因子结构。然而,从拟合指数来看,模型并没有达到充分拟合的标准。简明版和扩展版都与理论上相关的概念有显著的正相关。简明版(α = .96)和扩展版(α = .96)的内部一致性非常好:讨论:尽管该测量方法在建构效度和内部一致性方面具有前景,但仍有必要在各种儿童福利样本中对因子结构进行进一步测试:本研究为儿童福利领域提供了有关组织准备度的一种可能测量方法的信息,而组织准备度是实施科学中的一个重要概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Psychometric Analysis of the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) in a Child Welfare Setting.

Purpose: This study consisted of a psychometric analysis of the brief and expanded versions of the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) to assess the scale's validity and reliability in a child welfare setting.

Method: Based on responses from a sample of 313 child welfare professionals, factorial structure was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was assessed through correlations with theoretically linked concepts, and internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha.

Results: Factor analysis yielded a unidimensional structure for the brief version and a two-factor structure for the expanded version. However, the models did not meet the standards for sufficient fit, as evidenced by the fit indices. Both the brief and expanded versions were significantly and positively correlated with theoretically linked concepts. Internal consistency of the brief (α = .96) and expanded versions (α = .96) was excellent.

Discussion: Though the measure holds promise with respect to construct validity and internal consistency, further testing of the factorial structure in a variety of child welfare samples is warranted.

Conclusion: This study supports the field of child welfare with information regarding one possible measure of organizational readiness, an important concept in implementation science.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信