无创呼吸支持期间的镇痛管理:意大利麻醉、镇痛、复苏和重症监护学会(SIAARTI)制定的德尔菲专家共识文件。

G Spinazzola, S Spadaro, G Ferrone, S Grasso, S M Maggiore, G Cinnella, L Cabrini, G Cammarota, J G Maugeri, R Simonte, N Patroniti, L Ball, G Conti, D De Luca, A Cortegiani, A Giarratano, C Gregoretti
{"title":"无创呼吸支持期间的镇痛管理:意大利麻醉、镇痛、复苏和重症监护学会(SIAARTI)制定的德尔菲专家共识文件。","authors":"G Spinazzola, S Spadaro, G Ferrone, S Grasso, S M Maggiore, G Cinnella, L Cabrini, G Cammarota, J G Maugeri, R Simonte, N Patroniti, L Ball, G Conti, D De Luca, A Cortegiani, A Giarratano, C Gregoretti","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00203-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discomfort can be the cause of noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) failure in up to 50% of treated patients. Several studies have shown how analgosedation during NRS can reduce the rate of delirium, endotracheal intubation, and hospital length of stay in patients with acute respiratory failure. The purpose of this project was to explore consensus on which medications are currently available as analgosedatives during NRS, which types of patients may benefit from analgosedation while on NRS, and which clinical settings might be appropriate for the implementation of analgosedation during NRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) selected a panel of experts and asked them to define key aspects of the use of analgesics and sedatives during NRS treatment. The methodology applied is in line with the principles of the modified Delphi and RAND-UCLA methods. The experts developed statements and supportive rationales which were then subjected to blind votes for consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of an analgosedation strategy in adult patients with acute respiratory failure of different origins may be useful where there is a need to manage discomfort. This strategy should be considered after careful assessment of other potential factors associated with respiratory failure or inappropriate noninvasive respiratory support settings, which may, in turn, be responsible for NRS failure. Several drugs can be used, each of them specifically targeted to the main component of discomfort to treat. In addition, analgosedation during NRS treatment should always be combined with close cardiorespiratory monitoring in an appropriate clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of analgosedation during NRS has been studied in several clinical trials. However, its successful application relies on a thorough understanding of the pharmacological aspects of the sedative drugs used, the clinical conditions for which NRS is applied, and a careful selection of the appropriate clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of analgosedation during noninvasive respiratory support: an expert Delphi consensus document developed by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).\",\"authors\":\"G Spinazzola, S Spadaro, G Ferrone, S Grasso, S M Maggiore, G Cinnella, L Cabrini, G Cammarota, J G Maugeri, R Simonte, N Patroniti, L Ball, G Conti, D De Luca, A Cortegiani, A Giarratano, C Gregoretti\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44158-024-00203-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discomfort can be the cause of noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) failure in up to 50% of treated patients. Several studies have shown how analgosedation during NRS can reduce the rate of delirium, endotracheal intubation, and hospital length of stay in patients with acute respiratory failure. The purpose of this project was to explore consensus on which medications are currently available as analgosedatives during NRS, which types of patients may benefit from analgosedation while on NRS, and which clinical settings might be appropriate for the implementation of analgosedation during NRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) selected a panel of experts and asked them to define key aspects of the use of analgesics and sedatives during NRS treatment. The methodology applied is in line with the principles of the modified Delphi and RAND-UCLA methods. The experts developed statements and supportive rationales which were then subjected to blind votes for consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of an analgosedation strategy in adult patients with acute respiratory failure of different origins may be useful where there is a need to manage discomfort. This strategy should be considered after careful assessment of other potential factors associated with respiratory failure or inappropriate noninvasive respiratory support settings, which may, in turn, be responsible for NRS failure. Several drugs can be used, each of them specifically targeted to the main component of discomfort to treat. In addition, analgosedation during NRS treatment should always be combined with close cardiorespiratory monitoring in an appropriate clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of analgosedation during NRS has been studied in several clinical trials. However, its successful application relies on a thorough understanding of the pharmacological aspects of the sedative drugs used, the clinical conditions for which NRS is applied, and a careful selection of the appropriate clinical setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441104/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00203-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00203-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在接受治疗的患者中,高达 50% 的患者会因不适而导致无创呼吸支持(NRS)失败。多项研究表明,在无创呼吸支持过程中使用镇痛药可降低急性呼吸衰竭患者的谵妄率、气管插管率和住院时间。本项目旨在就以下问题达成共识:目前有哪些药物可作为 NRS 期间的镇痛剂;哪些类型的患者可从 NRS 期间的镇痛剂中获益;哪些临床环境适合在 NRS 期间实施镇痛:方法:意大利麻醉、镇痛、复苏和重症监护学会(SIAARTI)挑选了一个专家小组,要求他们确定在 NRS 治疗期间使用镇痛剂和镇静剂的主要方面。所采用的方法符合改良德尔菲法和兰德-乌拉法的原则。专家们制定了声明和支持性理由,然后通过盲法投票达成共识:结果:对于不同原因导致的急性呼吸衰竭成人患者,在需要控制不适症状时,使用镇痛策略可能会有所帮助。应在仔细评估与呼吸衰竭或无创呼吸支持设置不当相关的其他潜在因素(这些因素可能反过来导致 NRS 失效)后再考虑使用该策略。可以使用多种药物,每种药物都专门针对要治疗的主要不适症状。此外,在 NRS 治疗期间使用镇痛药时,应始终在适当的临床环境中结合密切的心肺监测:多项临床试验已对 NRS 期间使用镇痛剂进行了研究。然而,其成功应用有赖于对所用镇静药物的药理方面、NRS 的临床应用条件以及适当临床环境的谨慎选择的透彻了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of analgosedation during noninvasive respiratory support: an expert Delphi consensus document developed by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).

Background: Discomfort can be the cause of noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) failure in up to 50% of treated patients. Several studies have shown how analgosedation during NRS can reduce the rate of delirium, endotracheal intubation, and hospital length of stay in patients with acute respiratory failure. The purpose of this project was to explore consensus on which medications are currently available as analgosedatives during NRS, which types of patients may benefit from analgosedation while on NRS, and which clinical settings might be appropriate for the implementation of analgosedation during NRS.

Methods: The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) selected a panel of experts and asked them to define key aspects of the use of analgesics and sedatives during NRS treatment. The methodology applied is in line with the principles of the modified Delphi and RAND-UCLA methods. The experts developed statements and supportive rationales which were then subjected to blind votes for consensus.

Results: The use of an analgosedation strategy in adult patients with acute respiratory failure of different origins may be useful where there is a need to manage discomfort. This strategy should be considered after careful assessment of other potential factors associated with respiratory failure or inappropriate noninvasive respiratory support settings, which may, in turn, be responsible for NRS failure. Several drugs can be used, each of them specifically targeted to the main component of discomfort to treat. In addition, analgosedation during NRS treatment should always be combined with close cardiorespiratory monitoring in an appropriate clinical setting.

Conclusions: The use of analgosedation during NRS has been studied in several clinical trials. However, its successful application relies on a thorough understanding of the pharmacological aspects of the sedative drugs used, the clinical conditions for which NRS is applied, and a careful selection of the appropriate clinical setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信