对痴呆症家庭照顾者心理教育干预中的变化和变化机制的定性探索。

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Stephanie Kipfer, Cedric Mabire, Jean Vézina, Andrea Koppitz, Sandrine Pihet
{"title":"对痴呆症家庭照顾者心理教育干预中的变化和变化机制的定性探索。","authors":"Stephanie Kipfer, Cedric Mabire, Jean Vézina, Andrea Koppitz, Sandrine Pihet","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02602-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>'Learning to feel better… and help better' is a psychoeducational intervention that aims to empower family caregivers of people with dementia by helping them cope better with the daily stress of dementia caregiving. The intervention has been adapted to a Swiss context and evaluated with a mixed-method design, yielding promising results in caregivers, such as a reduced subjective burden and improved self-efficacy. Qualitative findings have provided insight into potentially relevant intermediate changes that must be further explored to better understand how the intervention precipitates the achieved changes. We aim to qualitatively explore such changes, related mechanisms and key intervention components in the context of this intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A constructivist grounded theory approach was used to achieve this aim. Changes, related mechanisms and key intervention components were identified by exploring the following: 1) longitudinal qualitative data, collected from 13 family caregivers via interviews performed before, during and after the intervention (39 interviews total) and 2) cross-sectional post-intervention interview data collected from 22 family caregivers (22 interviews).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experiencing calmness was the most important change for caregivers in the context of this intervention. The calmness model, developed based on the qualitative analysis, illustrates the intermediate changes that contributed to calmness, such as being able to cope with daily life and experiencing positive interactions with the family member with dementia. Related key intervention components were the coping strategy 'reframing', employed in diverse ways by the caregivers to reduce daily stress, and the didactic method 'active skills' training', which involved active participation by the caregivers and the guidance of a professional group leader. One important factor hampering changes in caregivers was having difficulties accepting the caregiver role or accepting the losses due to dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The calmness model offers valuable insight into how this intervention can benefit family caregivers and aid in developing interventions targeting similar mechanisms and changes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN13512408 (registration date 17.05.2021, retrospectively registered).</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"25 1","pages":"353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative exploration of changes and mechanisms of changes in a psychoeducational intervention for family dementia caregivers.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Kipfer, Cedric Mabire, Jean Vézina, Andrea Koppitz, Sandrine Pihet\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-024-02602-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>'Learning to feel better… and help better' is a psychoeducational intervention that aims to empower family caregivers of people with dementia by helping them cope better with the daily stress of dementia caregiving. The intervention has been adapted to a Swiss context and evaluated with a mixed-method design, yielding promising results in caregivers, such as a reduced subjective burden and improved self-efficacy. Qualitative findings have provided insight into potentially relevant intermediate changes that must be further explored to better understand how the intervention precipitates the achieved changes. We aim to qualitatively explore such changes, related mechanisms and key intervention components in the context of this intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A constructivist grounded theory approach was used to achieve this aim. Changes, related mechanisms and key intervention components were identified by exploring the following: 1) longitudinal qualitative data, collected from 13 family caregivers via interviews performed before, during and after the intervention (39 interviews total) and 2) cross-sectional post-intervention interview data collected from 22 family caregivers (22 interviews).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experiencing calmness was the most important change for caregivers in the context of this intervention. The calmness model, developed based on the qualitative analysis, illustrates the intermediate changes that contributed to calmness, such as being able to cope with daily life and experiencing positive interactions with the family member with dementia. Related key intervention components were the coping strategy 'reframing', employed in diverse ways by the caregivers to reduce daily stress, and the didactic method 'active skills' training', which involved active participation by the caregivers and the guidance of a professional group leader. One important factor hampering changes in caregivers was having difficulties accepting the caregiver role or accepting the losses due to dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The calmness model offers valuable insight into how this intervention can benefit family caregivers and aid in developing interventions targeting similar mechanisms and changes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN13512408 (registration date 17.05.2021, retrospectively registered).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437664/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02602-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02602-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:"学会更好地感受......更好地帮助 "是一项心理教育干预措施,旨在通过帮助痴呆症患者的家庭护理者更好地应对痴呆症护理的日常压力来增强他们的能力。根据瑞士的情况对该干预措施进行了调整,并采用混合方法设计对其进行了评估,结果显示,该干预措施在照顾者中产生了良好的效果,如减轻了主观负担,提高了自我效能感。定性研究结果让我们深入了解了潜在的相关中间变化,我们必须对这些变化进行进一步探讨,以更好地了解干预措施是如何促成这些变化的。我们旨在从定性角度探讨这种变化、相关机制以及干预措施的关键组成部分:方法:为实现这一目标,我们采用了建构主义基础理论方法。通过探索以下内容,确定了变化、相关机制和主要干预内容:1)纵向定性数据,通过干预前、干预期间和干预后的访谈(共 39 次访谈)从 13 个家庭照护者那里收集;2)横向干预后访谈数据,从 22 个家庭照护者那里收集(22 次访谈):结果:在干预过程中,平静是护理人员最重要的改变。在定性分析的基础上开发的平静模型说明了促成平静的中间变化,如能够应对日常生活以及体验与痴呆症家庭成员的积极互动。与此相关的主要干预内容包括:应对策略 "重新构思"(照护者通过不同方式来减轻日常压力)和说教方法 "积极技能培训"(照护者积极参与并在专业小组领导者的指导下进行)。阻碍照护者改变的一个重要因素是难以接受照护者的角色或难以接受痴呆症带来的损失:平静模式为了解这种干预措施如何使家庭照顾者受益提供了宝贵的见解,并有助于开发针对类似机制和变化的干预措施:ISRCTN13512408(注册日期:2021年5月17日,回顾性注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A qualitative exploration of changes and mechanisms of changes in a psychoeducational intervention for family dementia caregivers.

Background: 'Learning to feel better… and help better' is a psychoeducational intervention that aims to empower family caregivers of people with dementia by helping them cope better with the daily stress of dementia caregiving. The intervention has been adapted to a Swiss context and evaluated with a mixed-method design, yielding promising results in caregivers, such as a reduced subjective burden and improved self-efficacy. Qualitative findings have provided insight into potentially relevant intermediate changes that must be further explored to better understand how the intervention precipitates the achieved changes. We aim to qualitatively explore such changes, related mechanisms and key intervention components in the context of this intervention.

Methods: A constructivist grounded theory approach was used to achieve this aim. Changes, related mechanisms and key intervention components were identified by exploring the following: 1) longitudinal qualitative data, collected from 13 family caregivers via interviews performed before, during and after the intervention (39 interviews total) and 2) cross-sectional post-intervention interview data collected from 22 family caregivers (22 interviews).

Results: Experiencing calmness was the most important change for caregivers in the context of this intervention. The calmness model, developed based on the qualitative analysis, illustrates the intermediate changes that contributed to calmness, such as being able to cope with daily life and experiencing positive interactions with the family member with dementia. Related key intervention components were the coping strategy 'reframing', employed in diverse ways by the caregivers to reduce daily stress, and the didactic method 'active skills' training', which involved active participation by the caregivers and the guidance of a professional group leader. One important factor hampering changes in caregivers was having difficulties accepting the caregiver role or accepting the losses due to dementia.

Conclusion: The calmness model offers valuable insight into how this intervention can benefit family caregivers and aid in developing interventions targeting similar mechanisms and changes.

Trial registration: ISRCTN13512408 (registration date 17.05.2021, retrospectively registered).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信