最大等距躯干任务是否会产生背阔肌的最大活动量?

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Declan Price , Karen A. Ginn , Mark Halaki , Victor Kwasi , Darren Reed
{"title":"最大等距躯干任务是否会产生背阔肌的最大活动量?","authors":"Declan Price ,&nbsp;Karen A. Ginn ,&nbsp;Mark Halaki ,&nbsp;Victor Kwasi ,&nbsp;Darren Reed","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Electromyography (EMG) studies investigating latissimus dorsi activity during trunk tasks have reported high activation levels and described latissimus dorsi as an important contributor to trunk movement and stability. However, the normalisation of EMG data in these studies is inconsistent with some normalising to shoulder tasks and a majority normalising to trunk tasks. Therefore, this study aimed to compare commonly used shoulder and trunk normalisation tasks to determine if trunk tasks produce maximum activity in latissimus dorsi.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten asymptomatic participants completed maximal isometric trunk (extension, ipsilateral rotation and ipsilateral lateral flexion) and shoulder (extension and internal rotation) tasks while recording EMG signals from right latissimus dorsi using surface and indwelling electrodes. The signals were high-pass filtered, rectified then low-pass filtered to obtain an EMG linear envelope to represent muscle activity levels. The maximum activity levels across tasks were compared for each electrode type.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Shoulder extension elicited significantly higher (&gt;1.5 times) latissimus dorsi activity levels when recorded using both surface and indwelling electrodes compared to other shoulder and trunk tasks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Maximal isometric trunk tasks do not produce maximal latissimus dorsi activity and therefore when used for normalisation purposes potentially overestimate the contribution of latissimus dorsi to trunk tasks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 102933"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do maximal isometric trunk tasks produce maximum activity in latissimus dorsi?\",\"authors\":\"Declan Price ,&nbsp;Karen A. Ginn ,&nbsp;Mark Halaki ,&nbsp;Victor Kwasi ,&nbsp;Darren Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Electromyography (EMG) studies investigating latissimus dorsi activity during trunk tasks have reported high activation levels and described latissimus dorsi as an important contributor to trunk movement and stability. However, the normalisation of EMG data in these studies is inconsistent with some normalising to shoulder tasks and a majority normalising to trunk tasks. Therefore, this study aimed to compare commonly used shoulder and trunk normalisation tasks to determine if trunk tasks produce maximum activity in latissimus dorsi.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten asymptomatic participants completed maximal isometric trunk (extension, ipsilateral rotation and ipsilateral lateral flexion) and shoulder (extension and internal rotation) tasks while recording EMG signals from right latissimus dorsi using surface and indwelling electrodes. The signals were high-pass filtered, rectified then low-pass filtered to obtain an EMG linear envelope to represent muscle activity levels. The maximum activity levels across tasks were compared for each electrode type.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Shoulder extension elicited significantly higher (&gt;1.5 times) latissimus dorsi activity levels when recorded using both surface and indwelling electrodes compared to other shoulder and trunk tasks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Maximal isometric trunk tasks do not produce maximal latissimus dorsi activity and therefore when used for normalisation purposes potentially overestimate the contribution of latissimus dorsi to trunk tasks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102933\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641124000774\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641124000774","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:对躯干任务期间背阔肌活动进行的肌电图(EMG)研究报告了高激活水平,并将背阔肌描述为躯干运动和稳定性的重要贡献者。然而,这些研究中 EMG 数据的归一化并不一致,有些归一化为肩部任务,而大多数归一化为躯干任务。因此,本研究旨在比较常用的肩部和躯干归一化任务,以确定躯干任务是否会产生背阔肌的最大活动:方法:10 名无症状的参与者完成最大等长躯干(伸展、同侧旋转和同侧侧屈)和肩部(伸展和内旋)任务,同时使用表面和留置电极记录右侧背阔肌的肌电信号。信号经过高通滤波、整流和低通滤波后,得到一个代表肌肉活动水平的肌电图线性包络。比较了每种电极类型在不同任务中的最大活动水平:结果:与其他肩部和躯干任务相比,使用表面电极和留置电极记录肩部伸展时,背阔肌活动水平明显更高(>1.5 倍):结论:最大等长躯干任务不会产生最大背阔肌活动,因此当用于归一化目的时,可能会高估背阔肌对躯干任务的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do maximal isometric trunk tasks produce maximum activity in latissimus dorsi?

Introduction

Electromyography (EMG) studies investigating latissimus dorsi activity during trunk tasks have reported high activation levels and described latissimus dorsi as an important contributor to trunk movement and stability. However, the normalisation of EMG data in these studies is inconsistent with some normalising to shoulder tasks and a majority normalising to trunk tasks. Therefore, this study aimed to compare commonly used shoulder and trunk normalisation tasks to determine if trunk tasks produce maximum activity in latissimus dorsi.

Methods

Ten asymptomatic participants completed maximal isometric trunk (extension, ipsilateral rotation and ipsilateral lateral flexion) and shoulder (extension and internal rotation) tasks while recording EMG signals from right latissimus dorsi using surface and indwelling electrodes. The signals were high-pass filtered, rectified then low-pass filtered to obtain an EMG linear envelope to represent muscle activity levels. The maximum activity levels across tasks were compared for each electrode type.

Results

Shoulder extension elicited significantly higher (>1.5 times) latissimus dorsi activity levels when recorded using both surface and indwelling electrodes compared to other shoulder and trunk tasks.

Conclusion

Maximal isometric trunk tasks do not produce maximal latissimus dorsi activity and therefore when used for normalisation purposes potentially overestimate the contribution of latissimus dorsi to trunk tasks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques. As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信